A Comprehensive Valuation Analysis of Swimply: Monetizing Underutilized Assets in the Sharing Economy

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive valuation analysis of Swimply, a private company operating an online marketplace for the hourly rental of private recreational and functional spaces.

As a privately held, venture-backed entity, Swimply does not have a publicly disclosed net worth.

This analysis synthesizes publicly available data on the company’s funding history, revenue performance, business model, competitive landscape, and strategic initiatives to derive a defensible valuation range.

Swimply has successfully pioneered a new niche in the sharing economy, monetizing underutilized assets like private swimming pools, sport courts, and entire homes.

Its business model, which leverages a dual-commission structure charging fees to both hosts and guests, was significantly validated and accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which drove unprecedented demand for private, local recreation.

The company has attracted a total of approximately $51.2 million in funding from a syndicate of high-profile venture capital firms and strategic angel investors, including the founders of Airbnb, Poshmark, and Lime.

Despite its innovative concept and strong investor backing, the company faces considerable challenges.

Analysis of its financial data reveals a significant deceleration in growth following the pandemic boom, with 2022 revenue reported at $25 million and credible estimates placing 2023 revenue at approximately $27.9 million.

This modest growth rate, combined with intense competition from broader marketplace platforms like Peerspace and a significant, self-funded liability risk in the form of a “$1 Million Host Guarantee,” puts pressure on its valuation.

The company’s strategic pivot from a pool-sharing niche to a broader “Joyspace” marketplace is a necessary move to unlock a larger addressable market and justify its venture funding, but it introduces substantial operational complexity and brand risk.

The company’s valuation is caught in a dynamic tension between the high expectations set by its last major funding round in late 2021 and a more sober reality reflected in its current performance metrics.

Based on a revenue multiple analysis applied to the company’s estimated 2023 performance, and factoring in the identified risks and competitive pressures, this report estimates the current valuation of Swimply to be in the range of $83.7 million to $139.5 million.

This valuation reflects a company with a strong brand and a proven concept but one that must navigate significant headwinds to achieve the scale and profitability expected by its investors.

Section 1: Corporate Overview and Business Model Deconstruction

This section establishes a foundational understanding of Swimply, detailing its evolution from a niche pool-sharing concept to a broader marketplace for what the company terms “Joyspaces.” It deconstructs the core value proposition for both sides of its marketplace, its revenue mechanics, and the operational framework that underpins its business.

1.1 The Genesis of Swimply: A Hyper-Local Solution

Swimply’s origin is rooted in a personal need, a characteristic common to many successful marketplace startups.

The idea was conceived by founder Bunim Laskin, the eldest of 12 siblings, who was seeking an affordable way to entertain his family during a New Jersey summer.¹

He approached a neighbor with a rarely used swimming pool and negotiated an arrangement to use it in exchange for covering 25% of the pool’s annual upkeep costs.¹

The neighbor’s agreement to this informal, hyper-local transaction illuminated a potential market inefficiency: the gross underutilization of high-cost, high-value private assets.

This initial manual transaction served as the prototype for a scalable business.

Demonstrating what investors would later call “sheer personal hustle and persistence,” Laskin began using Google Earth’s satellite imagery to identify other homes with pools and would then knock on their doors to pitch the rental concept.²

This hands-on approach to building initial supply underscores the company’s grassroots origins.

While there are conflicting reports on the exact founding year—with sources citing 2012 ⁵, 2017 ⁶, and 2018 ⁷—the timeline of its product launch and initial funding rounds strongly suggests the business began to formalize around 2018.

It was at this point that Laskin dropped out of college to dedicate himself to the venture full-time.²

1.2 The Core Value Proposition: A Two-Sided Marketplace

Swimply operates as a peer-to-peer online marketplace that facilitates transactions between property owners, termed “Hosts,” and individuals or groups seeking hourly rentals, termed “Guests”.²

The platform’s success hinges on its ability to deliver a compelling value proposition to both sides of this market.

For Hosts, the primary value is the ability to monetize what is typically a significant, underutilized, and costly asset.³

Private swimming pools, for example, often sit idle for the vast majority of the time while still incurring substantial maintenance, insurance, and utility expenses.

Swimply provides a turnkey solution for these owners to generate a new income stream.

The financial incentive can be substantial.

While average host earnings are reported to be between $10,000 and $20,000 annually ¹¹, with some hosts citing monthly earnings of $5,000 to $12,000 ¹³, top-performing hosts have earned over $100,000 in a year.

One particularly successful host in Oregon reportedly netted between $177,000 and $200,000 over a two-year period.³

For Guests, the value proposition is centered on affordable, private, and convenient local access to recreational amenities without the significant financial burden and maintenance responsibilities of ownership.¹⁰

This model effectively democratizes access to luxury experiences.

The company taps into a vast market, with an estimated 96% of Americans not having access to a private swimming pool.⁸

Swimply offers a compelling alternative to crowded, often poorly maintained public pools or the high cost of hotel day passes, providing a private and controlled environment for family gatherings, parties, or personal relaxation.¹⁵

A pivotal element of Swimply’s strategy, which distinguishes it from competitors like Uber and Airbnb, is its “Host as a Franchise” model.

The company actively encourages its hosts to operate as independent businesses, marketing their own listings to their local communities.³

This hyper-local approach fosters strong community ties and can lead to high repeat business for successful hosts, creating a sticky supply side.

However, this reliance on host-led marketing also creates an uneven user experience across the platform and presents a significant scalability challenge.

Growth becomes dependent not just on platform-level marketing but on the company’s ability to activate and train thousands of individual “franchisees.” This operational model may lead to a power-law distribution of earnings, where a small percentage of highly entrepreneurial hosts generate a disproportionate share of the platform’s Gross Booking Value (GBV), while a “long tail” of more casual hosts contributes less, potentially impacting overall market liquidity and growth predictability.

1.3 Revenue Mechanics and Platform Functionality

Swimply’s business model is built on a dual-commission structure, a common and effective strategy for two-sided marketplaces that was popularized by platforms like Airbnb.²

The company generates revenue by taking a percentage of each transaction from both parties.

Specifically, Swimply charges a 15% service fee to the Host and a 10% service fee to the Guest.¹¹

This combined 25% take rate is confirmed by at least one investor source.⁴

Hosts have full autonomy to set their own hourly rental rates, which can be tiered based on the number of guests or vary by day of the week.²⁰

Prices on the platform typically range from $15 to $75 per hour for a standard booking but can escalate to several hundred dollars per hour for large, amenity-rich properties in prime locations.¹¹

The platform itself is designed to handle all core functions of the transaction, creating a seamless experience.

This includes tools for hosts to create and manage their listings, a search and discovery engine for guests with filters for amenities and location, a real-time calendar for booking, secure payment processing handled through Stripe, and an integrated messaging system for communication between hosts and guests.²

In a strategic move to create more predictable, recurring revenue, Swimply has also introduced a subscription-based service called “Premium Pass.” This offering alters the standard service fee structure for enrolled members, signaling an effort to build a more loyal user base and diversify beyond purely transactional income.⁹

1.4 User Experience and Platform Challenges

While the core concept is strong, the execution of the platform has not been without its challenges.

An analysis of user reviews on Apple’s App Store reveals several recurring points of friction in the user experience.

These include complaints about referral credits not being properly applied, a lack of functionality to hide or filter out undesirable or potentially fraudulent listings, and inaccuracies in the mapping feature that show listings in incorrect locations.¹⁵

These issues, while seemingly minor, can erode user trust and increase churn if not addressed.

Furthermore, the company’s terms and conditions place significant responsibility on its users.

The legal framework explicitly states that Swimply is merely a facilitator and not a party to the rental agreement, which is strictly between the Host and the Guest.⁹

This structure, combined with the company’s liability policies (discussed in Section 5), means users must be diligent in their own risk assessment.

The business model is fundamentally based on creating a new consumer behavior, which carries both high risk and high reward.

As noted by one of its investors, Swimply “were able to create consumer behaviors that didn’t previously exist”.⁴

Unlike Airbnb, which tapped into the existing behavior of seeking lodging, Swimply had to educate both sides of the market on the novel concept of hourly amenity rental.

The COVID-19 pandemic served as an unprecedented and powerful catalyst, forcing this new behavior into the mainstream as public facilities closed and demand for safe, private recreational options surged.²

The reported 4,000% to 5,000% growth during this period is a direct consequence of this external shock.²

A central question for the company’s valuation is the long-term sustainability of this pandemic-induced behavior.

The strategic expansion into a wider array of “Joyspaces” represents a significant bet that this new consumer habit is transferable beyond pools and is now a permanent feature of the sharing economy.

Section 2: Financial Performance and Funding Trajectory

This section provides a thorough financial analysis based on available data, focusing on Swimply’s capital acquisition history, key investors, revenue generation, and profitability profile.

The analysis synthesizes multiple, often conflicting, data points to construct a coherent financial narrative for the private company.

2.1 Capitalization History: A Conflicted Narrative

As is common for privately held companies, Swimply’s funding history is characterized by conflicting reports across various data providers and news outlets.

The total amount of capital raised is cited with significant variance, with figures including $50 million ⁵,

$51.2 million ¹⁸,

$62.8 million ³⁰, and

$63.2 million.⁶

Of these, the

$51.2 million figure is the most consistently reported across reputable business journals and financial data aggregators and will be used as the primary figure for this analysis.

The company’s journey to this figure includes several key milestones:

• Initial Capital: The venture was bootstrapped with an initial $30,000 raised from Laskin’s family and friends.²
• Pre-Seed/Seed Rounds: A crucial early-stage round of $1.2 million is consistently mentioned, with dates ranging from November 2018 to March 2019.² Some sources also indicate an additional seed round of $990,000 in April 2019.⁶
• Shark Tank Appearance (March 2020): A pivotal moment in the company’s public story was its appearance on the television show Shark Tank. Laskin sought an investment of $300,000 in exchange for 5% equity, which implied a $6 million valuation. All investors on the show declined, expressing skepticism about the valuation and the business model’s viability, particularly at the onset of the global pandemic.²
• Series A Round: In May 2021, on the back of explosive pandemic-fueled growth, Swimply closed a $10 million Series A financing round led by Norwest Venture Partners.²
• Major Funding Round ($40M): The company’s largest capital injection was a $40 million round that occurred in December 2021. This round is confusingly labeled as a “Series A” in some sources ¹⁸ and a “Series B” in others.⁵ The round was led by Mayfield.²⁵ For the purposes of this analysis, it will be treated as the company’s most significant funding event, bringing the total raised to the widely cited ~$51.2 million figure.

The following table synthesizes the most coherent timeline of Swimply’s funding history.

Date	Funding Round Type	Amount Raised	Lead Investor(s)	Key Participating Investors	Implied/Reported Valuation	Source Snippet(s)
Nov 2018 – Mar 2019	Pre-Seed / Seed	$1.2M	Not Disclosed	Family & Friends	Not Disclosed	2
Mar 2020	Pitch (No Deal)	($300k ask)	N/A (All Sharks Declined)	N/A	$6M (pre-money)	31
May 2021	Series A	$10M	Norwest Venture Partners	Trust Ventures, various angels	Not Disclosed	2
Dec 2021	Series A / B	$40M	Mayfield	GGV Capital, Norwest, angels	Not Disclosed	18
Total (Approx.)		~$51.2M				18

2.2 Key Investors and Strategic Backing

Beyond the dollar amounts, the composition of Swimply’s investor base represents a significant intangible asset.

The quality of the syndicate provides powerful market validation and access to an invaluable strategic network.

• Venture Capital Firms: The company is backed by a roster of top-tier venture capital firms known for investing in successful marketplaces. This includes Mayfield, the lead investor in the $40 million round; Norwest Venture Partners, the lead for the $10 million Series A; GGV Capital, a firm with deep experience in the sharing economy through its investment in Airbnb; Trust Ventures; and Ensemble VC.²
• Strategic Angel Investors: Of particular importance is the involvement of angel investors who are pioneers of the sharing economy. This “brain trust” includes Nate Blecharczyk, co-founder of Airbnb; Manish Chandra, CEO of Poshmark; Fidji Simo, CEO of Instacart; and Brad Bao, co-founder of Lime.⁸ Their participation is more than just capital; it provides Swimply with access to unparalleled expertise in navigating the precise challenges the company faces, such as scaling a two-sided marketplace, managing trust and safety protocols, lobbying regulators, and achieving global reach. This strategic backing de-risks the investment to a degree and can help the company avoid common pitfalls, justifying a qualitative premium in its valuation.

2.3 Revenue Analysis and Growth Metrics

Swimply’s revenue trajectory is a story of explosive, event-driven growth followed by a period of more modest, challenging expansion.

• Pre-Pandemic Performance: The company’s revenue was negligible in its early years. At the time of its March 2020 Shark Tank appearance, its total lifetime revenue was a mere $215,000, which was a key reason for the investors’ skepticism.³³
• The Pandemic Boom: The COVID-19 pandemic was a transformational event for Swimply. With public facilities closed and people seeking safe, private recreational outlets, the company experienced a dramatic surge in business. Reports indicate a 4,000% to 5,000% increase in revenue and platform activity during 2020.² This hyper-growth phase is what attracted significant venture capital interest and enabled its subsequent large funding rounds.
• Post-Pandemic Revenue: The company’s more recent financial performance presents a more complex picture.

• For the full year of 2022, Swimply reported $25 million in revenue.¹⁸ This figure serves as the most solid recent benchmark for the company’s scale.
• The revenue figure for 2023 is subject to a significant data conflict that represents a potential red flag. A report from March 2023, citing data as of that month, states the company has “over $8 million in annual revenue”.³³ This figure, if interpreted as a full-year forecast, would imply a catastrophic ~68% year-over-year revenue collapse from the $25 million achieved in 2022. Such a contraction would be devastating for a venture-backed growth company. It is more likely that this figure is an anomaly, a misinterpretation of a trailing quarterly figure annualized during the platform’s slow season, or a simple reporting error.
• A more plausible estimate for 2023 revenue comes from the data analytics firm Growjo, which estimates Swimply’s current annual revenue at $27.9 million.³⁶ This figure suggests modest year-over-year growth of approximately 11.6% from 2022. For the purpose of valuation, this report will proceed using the $27.9 million estimate as a more credible reflection of the company’s current scale, while acknowledging the $8 million figure as a noted risk factor or data anomaly.

2.4 Profitability and Host-Side Economics

Like most high-growth, venture-backed technology companies, sustained profitability is not Swimply’s primary near-term objective; growth and market capture are.

During his Shark Tank pitch, Laskin projected that the company was on a path to break even in 2021.³¹

A co-founder later claimed that the company did “turn profitable” during the 2020 boom, which likely served as a key proof point for attracting the $10 million Series A round.²⁴

However, it is highly probable that the company is currently operating at a loss as it reinvests its significant capital raises into market expansion, product development, and marketing.

The economics on the host side of the platform are a crucial driver of supply.

While the platform can be highly lucrative for top earners, who can make six-figure annual incomes ¹⁴, the average host earns a more modest $10,000 to $20,000 per year.¹¹

It is important to note that this income is not entirely passive.

Successful hosts report that it requires significant effort in terms of pool maintenance, cleaning between guests, and active guest management, with one top earner describing himself as a “pool provider” who checks chemicals up to 10 times a day.¹¹

Section 3: Market Analysis and Competitive Positioning

This section situates Swimply within the broader sharing economy, defines its target market, and evaluates its strategic position relative to a diverse set of competitors.

3.1 The “Passion Space” Niche and Market Size

Swimply is a pioneer in a distinct segment of the sharing economy focused on the hourly rental of what its founders call “passion spaces” or “joyspaces”.⁴

This category moves beyond the utilitarian nature of platforms like Uber (transportation) or the lodging focus of Airbnb, venturing into the realm of experiential and recreational rentals.

The company’s initial beachhead market was private swimming pool sharing.

Investors have cited the size of the “swimming pool sharing market” as being $52 billion.⁸

This figure should be interpreted with caution, as it likely represents a broad Total Addressable Market (TAM) encompassing the total value of private pools or the entire aquatics industry, rather than the immediate revenue opportunity for hourly rentals.

Nonetheless, it points to a substantial asset class that Swimply aims to monetize.

The company’s strategic expansion into other categories—including tennis courts, pickleball courts, home gyms, music studios, and entire homes—dramatically increases its potential TAM.

This pivot moves Swimply from its niche origin into the much larger and more competitive markets for local experiences and short-term space rentals.²⁴

3.2 Competitive Landscape: A Multi-Front Battle

Swimply does not operate in a vacuum.

It faces a complex and multi-front competitive landscape, with rivals attacking different facets of its business model.

• Direct Niche Competitors: The most direct competitor is Swimmy, another platform focused specifically on hourly pool rentals. However, Swimmy’s market presence is significantly smaller than Swimply’s, particularly in the United States.⁶
• Broad Venue Marketplaces: The most significant competitive threat comes from Peerspace. As the largest online marketplace for hourly rentals of all types of venues, Peerspace has a broader inventory and a larger user base. While it is less specialized in aquatic rentals, its platform already facilitates the booking of spaces with pools, and as Swimply expands into other “Joyspaces,” it moves directly onto Peerspace’s core turf.⁶
• Accommodation-Centric Platforms: Giants like Airbnb and Vrbo represent indirect competition. Their model is based on nightly rentals of entire homes, many of which include pools. While they do not offer hourly pool-only rentals, they compete for the same consumer leisure spending and offer an alternative for users seeking a private pool experience in conjunction with an overnight stay.¹⁰
• Experience-Based Platforms: Companies like ResortPass compete for guest demand by offering day passes to commercial hotel pools and amenities. They target the same end-user but draw from a different supply source (commercial hotels vs. private residences).⁶
• Hyper-Niche Platforms: The rise of other specialized marketplaces, such as Sniffspot for renting private, dog-friendly spaces, creates competition for specific user segments. With Swimply’s formal launch of a pet-friendly category, the overlap with Sniffspot has become more direct.⁶

The frequent description of Swimply as the “Airbnb for pools” is both a blessing and a curse.¹¹

The analogy provides an instant and powerful mental shortcut for investors and consumers, leveraging the immense success of Airbnb.

The participation of an Airbnb co-founder as a key investor further solidifies this connection.²⁹

However, this comparison also sets an impossibly high bar for expectations and invites direct comparisons on metrics where the businesses are fundamentally different.

Airbnb is a global, low-frequency, high-transaction-value model, whereas Swimply is a local, high-frequency, low-transaction-value model.

Applying Airbnb’s valuation metrics directly to Swimply would be a critical analytical error.

The valuation must instead be based on metrics relevant to a local marketplace, such as user retention, local network effects, and the ratio of customer lifetime value (LTV) to customer acquisition cost (CAC).

The following table provides a comparative analysis of Swimply and its key competitors.

Competitor	Business Model	Primary Offering	Pricing Structure (User)	Commission Rate	Target Audience	Key Differentiator
Swimply	Peer-to-Peer Marketplace	Hourly rental of private pools, courts, homes, etc.	Per Hour + Per Guest Fee	Host: 15%, Guest: 10%	Local residents seeking private, short-duration recreational experiences.	Specialization in private “Joyspaces”; hourly booking model.
Peerspace	Peer-to-Peer Marketplace	Hourly rental of diverse venues (studios, lofts, homes, event spaces).	Per Hour	Host: 15%	Event planners, photographers, corporate teams, individuals seeking unique spaces.	Broadest inventory of diverse spaces for various use cases.
Airbnb / Vrbo	Peer-to-Peer Marketplace	Nightly rental of entire homes, rooms, apartments.	Per Night + Fees	Varies (Host: ~3-15%)	Travelers, vacationers seeking lodging.	Focus on accommodation and overnight stays.
ResortPass	B2C Marketplace	Day passes for access to hotel pools, spas, and amenities.	Per Day Pass	Not disclosed (B2B partnerships)	Locals and travelers seeking a luxury hotel experience without an overnight stay.	Access to commercial, resort-style amenities.
Swimmy	Peer-to-Peer Marketplace	Hourly rental of private pools.	Per Hour	Not disclosed	Local residents seeking private pool access.	Direct, but smaller, competitor to Swimply’s core offering.

3.3 Market Share and Web Traffic Analysis

Web traffic data serves as a useful proxy for relative market share and brand awareness in the digital marketplace space.

According to data from Semrush for June 2025, Swimply’s primary competitor, Peerspace, is the larger platform, attracting 1.43 million monthly visits compared to Swimply’s 908,540 visits.⁴²

While smaller, Swimply’s traffic demonstrates strong momentum, with one report indicating a month-over-month increase of 51.28%.⁴³

This suggests effective marketing campaigns or strong seasonal demand.

However, other metrics point to Peerspace’s more established position.

Peerspace has a higher global website ranking and visitors on its site view more pages per visit, which may indicate deeper user engagement or a broader range of offerings that encourages more exploration.⁴²

Conversely, Swimply exhibits a higher bounce rate (53.38%), which could be a sign of less qualified traffic or challenges with landing page conversion.⁴²

The competitive dynamic with Peerspace is the most critical to Swimply’s future.

As Swimply expands its inventory beyond pools into courts, studios, and backyards, it is moving from its defensible niche directly into competition with the more established, generalist Peerspace platform.

This creates a direct strategic collision.

Peerspace holds the advantage of scale, a larger user base, and existing brand recognition in the general space rental market.

Swimply’s advantage lies in its strong brand equity and specialization within the recreational “fun” niche, particularly aquatics.

The long-term outcome of this battle will depend on which brand can better execute its strategy and win customer loyalty.

This intense competitive pressure is a key factor that could suppress Swimply’s valuation multiples.

Section 4: Strategic Direction and Expansion Vectors

This section analyzes Swimply’s strategy for future growth, which is centered on expanding its service categories, growing its geographic footprint, and leveraging a unique community-driven marketing approach.

4.1 Category Expansion: From Pools to “Joyspaces”

The cornerstone of Swimply’s long-term growth strategy is the expansion beyond its initial niche of swimming pools into a broad array of rentable “Joyspaces.” This strategic pivot is a direct response to the need to unlock a larger addressable market and provide venture-scale returns to its investors.

The company is actively adding new categories to its platform, including tennis courts, pickleball courts, basketball hoops, home gyms, music studios, large backyards for events, and even entire homes for hourly rental.²

This expansion was not merely a top-down strategic decision but was also informed by user behavior.

The company observed that many guests were booking pools primarily to use the surrounding area—the patio, grill, and yard—with the water itself being a secondary amenity.³

This insight revealed a broader demand for private outdoor space, prompting the company to formalize these additional categories.

The $40 million funding round raised in late 2021 was explicitly intended to fuel this diversification.²⁹

Swimply has also demonstrated an agile ability to respond to emerging user demand.

In June 2025, the company announced the formal launch of a “Pet Swim” category after observing a remarkable 700% increase in pet-related inquiries on its platform in the preceding year.⁴⁰

This move caters to the growing market of pet owners seeking safe, private spaces for their animals and is expected to bring over 50,000 dogs onto the platform.

This pivot from a specialized pool-sharing app to a broad marketplace for recreational spaces is both necessary and perilous.

It is necessary because the pool market, while substantial, is highly seasonal and geographically constrained, limiting the potential for year-round, global growth.

To justify its venture funding, Swimply must expand its TAM.

However, the pivot is perilous because it introduces significant operational complexity.

The safety protocols, maintenance requirements, and liability considerations for a home gym or a large event are vastly different from those for a swimming pool.

Furthermore, it risks diluting the company’s powerful brand identity.

The name “Swimply” is a brilliant and memorable portmanteau for a pool-sharing app, but it is far less intuitive for renting a tennis court or a home theater.

This could create marketing friction and brand confusion as the company scales.

The ultimate success of this expansion is arguably the single most important variable determining Swimply’s future valuation.

4.2 Geographic Expansion

Alongside category expansion, Swimply is pursuing growth through geographic expansion.

The company currently operates across the United States (in all 50 states and over 125 distinct markets), Canada (with at least two markets), and Australia (with at least five markets).²

The company has publicly stated its plans to continue launching in new domestic and international markets.²⁷

Its growth playbook appears to follow a methodical, city-by-city approach.

This involves concentrating resources to build sufficient liquidity—a critical mass of both hosts and guests—in one market before expanding to the next.³

This strategy is capital-intensive but is essential for ensuring a viable marketplace and a positive user experience in new regions.

The $10 million Series A financing was, in part, designated to support these market launches.¹⁷

4.3 Marketing and Community-Building Strategy

Swimply’s marketing strategy is distinct from that of many other large-scale marketplaces.

The company employs a “hyper-local” approach, utilizing targeted tactics like local billboards to build awareness within specific communities.³

A core and unique element of this strategy is the empowerment and mobilization of its hosts.

Unlike platforms like Uber or Airbnb that rely heavily on centralized, platform-level marketing, Swimply actively encourages its hosts to become their own marketers.³

The company provides hosts with tools and training to create their own social media accounts, market their listings within their personal and community networks, and essentially operate as individual business development arms for their own “franchise”.³

This approach leverages the host’s intimate knowledge of their local community and their personal network, turning them into authentic and effective brand ambassadors.

This community-driven model can create powerful local network effects and foster a strong sense of ownership and partnership among hosts, which can be a significant competitive advantage.

Section 5: Operational Analysis and Risk Assessment

This section evaluates Swimply’s operational framework, leadership, and the critical risk factors that could impact its valuation and long-term viability.

These risks include liability management, regulatory hurdles, and community relations.

5.1 Leadership and Vision

Swimply is led by its co-founders, who bring a combination of passionate vision and entrepreneurial experience to the company.

The core vision is driven by CEO Bunim Laskin, whose personal story of founding the company provides an authentic and compelling narrative.¹

He is complemented by co-founder and COO

Asher Weinberger, who brings prior entrepreneurial experience as the founder and CEO of the e-commerce brand Twillory.²

The leadership team’s stated vision is ambitious, aiming to do more than just rent spaces.

They aspire to “democratize” access to joyful experiences that are typically reserved for the affluent and, in doing so, redefine the modern concept of ownership.⁴

This mission-driven approach can be a powerful tool for attracting talent, building a strong company culture, and creating an emotional connection with users.

5.2 Liability and Trust: The “Host Guarantee” Gamble

A critical operational and financial risk for Swimply revolves around its approach to liability.

As of 2023, the company made a significant strategic shift: it no longer provides a third-party liability insurance policy for its hosts.²

This policy was replaced with a self-funded program consisting of a

“$1 million Host Guarantee” for liability claims and “$10,000 of property protection” for hosts operating in the United States.²

This decision represents a double-edged sword that fundamentally alters the company’s risk profile.

On one hand, by eliminating the fixed and predictable cost of insurance premiums, Swimply can improve its operating margins on paper.

On the other hand, it internalizes the full, uncapped financial risk of catastrophic liability claims.

A single major incident, such as a drowning or a severe injury at a listed property, could result in a multi-million-dollar claim that would be paid directly from Swimply’s own cash reserves.

The company’s Terms of Service attempt to mitigate this by legally positioning Swimply as a platform facilitator, not an insurer, and making it clear that the rental agreement is strictly between the host and the guest.⁹

However, this creates a potential disconnect between the company’s legal footing and its marketing, which promotes “worry-free up to $1,000,000 protection”.¹³

The “$1 Million Guarantee” is a powerful marketing tool, but as a self-funded promise, its value and reliability are entirely dependent on Swimply’s own financial solvency.

It is not equivalent to a policy underwritten by a major insurance carrier.

This creates a significant, unquantified contingent liability on the company’s balance sheet.

Any sophisticated valuation must apply a discount factor to account for this “black swan” risk, which could threaten the company’s existence in a worst-case scenario.

5.3 Regulatory and Community Hurdles

As a disruptor creating a new market, Swimply has inevitably faced regulatory challenges.

In a notable 2021 case, the Wisconsin Department of Health contended that Swimply hosts were effectively operating as public pools, which would require them to be licensed and adhere to commercial pool regulations.

The department threatened hosts with fines.

In response, Swimply threatened to sue the state, which ultimately backed down.³³

This incident serves as a precedent for the types of conflicts the company may face with local health, safety, and zoning authorities as it continues to scale.

Recognizing that hourly rentals can create friction within neighborhoods due to issues like noise, parking, and increased traffic, Swimply has proactively tried to manage this risk.

The company implemented a “Good Neighbor” policy, which provides guidelines for hosts on communicating with their neighbors and includes a dedicated system for neighbors to report problematic hosts or guests.³

This policy is a crucial and forward-thinking measure to mitigate one of the key sociological risks of scaling a hyper-local marketplace.

Section 6: Valuation Synthesis and Net Worth Estimation

This culminating section synthesizes all prior analysis of Swimply’s financial performance, market position, strategic direction, and operational risks to derive a reasoned estimate of its current valuation, or “net worth.”

6.1 Historical Valuation Benchmarks

The public record contains several data points that serve as historical benchmarks for Swimply’s valuation, though they present a conflicting picture.

• March 2020 (Shark Tank Pitch): The company sought a $6 million pre-money valuation based on its ask of $300,000 for 5% equity. This valuation was unanimously rejected by the investors on the show as being too high relative to the company’s minimal lifetime revenue of $215,000 at the time.³¹
• July 2022 / March 2023 (Post-Funding): A valuation of $30 million is cited by a single source, SharkTankBlog, for this period.³³ This figure is highly suspect and problematic. For a company that had already raised over $50 million in capital by the end of 2021, a $30 million valuation would imply a catastrophic down-round and a valuation less than the total capital invested. It is more likely that this figure is an error, a misinterpretation of an internal metric, or an outdated number. It is not a credible benchmark for the company’s post-funding valuation.

6.2 Valuation Methodologies

For a private, high-growth technology company like Swimply, valuation is typically determined using a combination of methods.

• Precedent Transaction Analysis: The most recent major funding round—$40 million in December 2021—is the most relevant precedent transaction. However, the post-money valuation for this round has not been publicly disclosed.²⁹ Without knowing the percentage of equity sold to investors, a precise valuation cannot be derived. However, a typical Series A or B round for a high-growth company might involve selling 15-25% of equity. If this were the case, it would imply a post-money valuation in the range of
  $160 million to $267 million in late 2021. This theoretical range stands in stark contrast to the dubious $30 million figure reported later and highlights the valuation pressure the company may be under if its growth has not met investor expectations.
• Comparable Company Analysis (Comps): Finding direct public comparables for Swimply is difficult. Its closest competitor, Peerspace, is also private. While Airbnb is a public company in the sharing economy, its global, accommodation-focused model makes it an imperfect comparison, as previously discussed. Therefore, the analysis must rely on a broader set of revenue multiples for high-growth, two-sided consumer marketplaces. These multiples can range widely, typically from 5x to 15x annual revenue, but are highly dependent on factors like growth rate, profitability, market leadership, and risk profile.
• Revenue Multiple Analysis: This methodology provides the most grounded approach based on the available data.

• 2022 Revenue: $25 million.¹⁸
• Estimated 2023 Revenue: This analysis uses the Growjo estimate of $27.9 million as the most credible figure, representing a year-over-year growth rate of approximately 11.6%.³⁶
• A company exhibiting this modest level of growth, coupled with the significant operational and liability risks outlined in Section 5 and the direct competitive pressure from Peerspace, would command a revenue multiple at the lower end of the typical venture-backed range. A multiple in the range of 3.0x to 5.0x trailing twelve-month revenue is deemed appropriate and defensible.

6.3 Final Valuation Range Synthesis

The final valuation must reconcile the conflicting narratives present in the data: the high expectations set by the 2021 funding boom versus the more recent reality of decelerated growth.

The analysis dismisses the reported $30 million valuation from 2023 as not credible given the company’s capitalization table.

The valuation derived from the 2021 funding round ($160M+) represents a historical high-water mark that the company may no longer justify based on current performance.

Therefore, the valuation is calculated by applying the selected revenue multiple range to the most credible estimate of current revenue:

• Estimated 2023 Revenue: $27.9 million
• Applied Revenue Multiple Range: 3.0x – 5.0x
• This conservative range is selected to reflect key factors:

1. Modest Growth: The ~11.6% YoY growth is significantly lower than the hyper-growth of the pandemic era.
2. Competitive Pressure: Direct competition from the larger Peerspace platform caps the potential for market dominance.
3. Liability Risk: The self-funded “Host Guarantee” represents a material and unquantified financial risk that warrants a valuation discount.

This calculation yields a final estimated valuation range for Swimply:

• Low End:
  27.9M×3.0=$83.7 million
  * High End:
  27.9M×5.0=$139.5 million

This range represents a significant haircut from the potential valuation peak in late 2021 but provides a more realistic assessment based on the company’s current financial picture and risk profile.

The company’s valuation appears to be caught between its high-flying funding history and its current, more modest growth reality.

The investors who participated in the $40 million round are likely “underwater” at this valuation, creating immense pressure on the company to re-accelerate growth to justify the capital it has raised.

The strategic pivot into “Joyspaces” is a direct response to this pressure.

Section 7: Strategic Outlook and Concluding Remarks

Swimply stands as a compelling case study in the evolution of the sharing economy.

It has successfully identified and unlocked a new market niche, creating a strong brand and proving the viability of monetizing underutilized private recreational assets.

The company’s journey, from a simple neighborhood agreement to a venture-backed enterprise with a presence in three countries, is a testament to its founders’ vision and tenacity.

However, the company is now at a critical inflection point.

The explosive, pandemic-fueled growth that attracted over $50 million in capital has given way to a more challenging environment characterized by decelerated growth and heightened competition.

The company’s long-term value, and its ability to provide a venture-scale return to its investors, hinges on its successful navigation of several key challenges.

First, the strategic expansion from a defensible pool-sharing niche into the broader, more competitive “Joyspaces” market is paramount.

This pivot is essential for growth but carries substantial risks of brand dilution and operational strain.

Success in this endeavor will determine whether Swimply becomes a dominant player in local experiential rentals or remains a profitable but smaller niche business.

Second, the company must manage the significant financial risk it has assumed by replacing third-party insurance with a self-funded Host Guarantee.

While this may improve short-term margins, it exposes the company to a catastrophic liability risk that could threaten its solvency.

A continued focus on safety, robust screening, and potentially revisiting a hybrid insurance model will be critical to mitigating this exposure.

Finally, the company’s valuation reflects the tension between its past funding and its current performance.

The estimated range of $83.7 million to $139.5 million acknowledges the company’s solid revenue base and strong brand but appropriately discounts for its modest growth, intense competition, and unique liability structure.

Swimply has proven that there is a market for what it sells; its future worth will be determined by its ability to profitably scale that market while managing the considerable risks it faces on the path to growth.

Works cited

1. How He Built the Airbnb for Pools — Meet the Founder of Swimply | Behind the Stays, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://behindthestays.podbean.com/e/how-he-built-the-airbnb-for-pools-%E2%80%94%C2%A0meet-the-founder-of-swimply/
2. Swimply – Wikipedia, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swimply
3. Sitting Down with Swimply Founder and CEO, Bunim Laskin – YU Commentator, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://yucommentator.org/2021/10/sitting-down-with-swimply-founder-and-ceo-bunim-laskin/
4. Why We’re Diving in with Swimply – Ensemble VC, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.ensemble.vc/research/why-we-re-diving-in-with-swimply
5. Swimply – 2025 Company Profile & Funding – Tracxn, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/swimply/__wexn6JP9AboUh_rzkn43_NQCif8igGOnL3h5eGxP9-M
6. Swimply 2025 Company Profile: Valuation, Funding & Investors | PitchBook, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/268321-33
7. Bunim Laskin – Forbes, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/profile/bunim-laskin/
8. Partnering with Swimply to Pioneer a New Era in the Sharing Economy – Mayfield, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.mayfield.com/news/partnering-with-swimply-to-pioneer-a-new-era-in-the-sharing-economy/
9. Rent your own private pool by the hour – Swimply, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://swimply.com/termsandconditions
10. How to Create a Pool Rental Website: Your Step-by-Step Guide to Building a Platform Like Swimply – Sharetribe, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.sharetribe.com/create/how-to-build-website-like-swimply/
11. Pool Rental App Swimply Is The New Side Hustle For Homeowners – Pool Magazine, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.poolmagazine.com/pool-news/pool-rental-app-swimply-side-hustle/
12. Swimply, The Side Hustle For Pool Owners – Issuu, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://issuu.com/poolmagazinedotcom/docs/pool-magazine-volume2-issue3/s/16563065
13. Earn Money With Your Swimming Pool | Become a Swimply Host, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://swimply.com/become-a-host
14. Swimply Host Makes $200,000 on Pool-Sharing Platform | AQUA Magazine, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.aquamagazine.com/news/article/15302143/swimply-host-makes-200000-on-poolsharing-platform
15. Swimply – Rent Private Pools on the App Store, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://apps.apple.com/us/app/swimply-rent-private-pools/id1472785554
16. Swimply – Rent Private Pools – Apps on Google Play, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.swimply.android
17. Swimply, A Pool Rental Platform For Homeowners, Raises $10 Million – Pulse 2.0, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://pulse2.com/swimply-a-pool-rental-platform-for-homeowners-raises-10-million/
18. labusinessjournal.com, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://labusinessjournal.com/technology-2019/swimply/#:~:text=Swimply%20has%20raised%20about%20%2451.2,hosts%20and%2010%25%20from%20guests.
19. Swimply Enters Homes – Los Angeles Business Journal, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://labusinessjournal.com/technology-2019/swimply/
20. Here’s How Much Money You Can Make by Renting Out Your Pool | Lifehacker, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://lifehacker.com/heres-how-much-money-you-can-make-by-renting-out-your-p-1849353370
21. What I learnedWhat we using Swimply : r/passive_income – Reddit, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/passive_income/comments/hu2thm/what_i_learnedwhat_we_using_swimply/
22. Swimply: Renting Willing Strangers’ Pools For Profit – CandysDirt.com, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://candysdirt.com/2021/06/10/swimply-renting-willing-strangers-pools-for-profit/
23. Startup of the Week: An ‘Airbnb for Pools’ Where the Hosts Are Stock Images – VICE, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.vice.com/en/article/startup-of-the-week-san-airbnb-for-pools-where-the-hosts-are-stock-images-swimply/
24. Swimply lets you swim in a stranger’s pool. It’s less weird than you think – CNET, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.cnet.com/culture/swimply-the-airbnb-for-pools-lets-you-swim-at-a-strangers-house-its-less-weird-than-you-think/
25. 2025 Funding Rounds & List of Investors – Swimply – Tracxn, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/swimply/__wexn6JP9AboUh_rzkn43_NQCif8igGOnL3h5eGxP9-M/funding-and-investors
26. Swimply Company Information – Funding, Investors, and More – Seedtable, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.seedtable.com/startups/Swimply-4NXYGK4
27. Swimply diversifies into home rental offering – Short Term Rentals, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://shorttermrentalz.com/news/swimply-diversification-homes-offering/
28. Swimply Funding Information | Wellfound, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://wellfound.com/company/swimply/funding
29. How Much Did Swimply Raise? Funding & Key Investors – Clay, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.clay.com/dossier/swimply-funding
30. Swimply Company Overview, Contact Details & Competitors – LeadIQ, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://leadiq.com/c/swimply/5cd0a0d61f00000d015bb441
31. Swimply Net Worth: Info on ‘Shark Tank’ Pool-Sharing App, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://marketrealist.com/p/swimply-net-worth/
32. How Fast Can Swimply Owner Talk In Order To Get A Deal? | Shark Tank US – YouTube, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CVHdT89xTI&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD
33. Swimply Shark Tank Update – Shark Tank Season 11, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.sharktankblog.com/business/swimply/
34. Swimply outlines expansion plans, announces $10 million in investor funding, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.poolspamarketing.com/trade/swimply-outlines-expansion-plans-announces-10-million-in-investor-funding/
35. www.sharktankblog.com, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.sharktankblog.com/business/swimply/#:~:text=Swimply%20got%20their%20legal%20team,courts%20as%20well%20as%20homes.
36. Swimply: Revenue, Competitors, Alternatives – Growjo, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://growjo.com/company/Swimply
37. Turning a Passion Into Profit: How One Couple Built a Thriving Business Renting Private Pools | by The Layman Speaks | Medium, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://medium.com/@thelaymanspeaks/turning-a-passion-into-profit-how-one-couple-built-a-thriving-business-renting-private-pools-581943b38480
38. Swimply allows users to rent pools and it’s booming – YouTube, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnD0B-K0ks4
39. 8 Swimply Competitors To Rent A Pool From This Summer – Peerspace, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.peerspace.com/resources/swimply-competitors/
40. Swimply® Makes a Splash with New Pet Swim Category – PR Newswire, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/swimply-makes-a-splash-with-new-pet-swim-category-302481993.html
41. ‘Swimply’ Site Applies Airbnb Model To Swimming Pools – SwimSwam, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://swimswam.com/swimply-site-applies-airbnb-model-toswiming-pools/
42. Top 1 swimply.com Alternatives & Competitors, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.semrush.com/website/swimply.com/competitors/
43. swimply.com Website Traffic, Ranking, Analytics [June 2025] – Semrush, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.semrush.com/website/swimply.com/overview/
44. Rent private homes, by the hour – Swimply, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://swimply.com/homes
45. Swimply CEO on expanding their recreational offerings – YouTube, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZinDgVFB7ec
46. EM Group Chat #080: Building & Launching Swimply With Bunim Laskin, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.everythingmarketplaces.com/c/bunim-laskin-swimply