The Fortress and the Fallout: A Financial Deconstruction of Steven Seagal’s Net Worth

Introduction: The $16 Million Paradox

In the pantheon of 1980s and 1990s action cinema, few stars ascended as rapidly or with as distinct a persona as Steven Seagal.

With a signature blend of Aikido, a stoic demeanor, and a string of box-office hits, he became a household name and a titan of the genre.

Yet, decades later, a striking financial paradox has emerged.

While his contemporaries command fortunes measured in the hundreds of millions, Steven Seagal’s estimated net worth hovers between $14 million and $16 million.¹

This figure stands in stark contrast to the financial empires built by his peers: Arnold Schwarzenegger’s net worth is estimated at over $750 million, Sylvester Stallone’s at $400 million, and Bruce Willis’s at $250 million.²

Even Jean-Claude Van Damme, often considered a direct B-list rival, has a reported net worth of approximately $40 million, more than double Seagal’s.⁵

This discrepancy raises a fundamental question: What happened? How did an actor who once dominated the box office end up with a net worth that pales in comparison to his peers? The answer is not a single event but a complex financial narrative of missed opportunities, questionable ventures, and strategic miscalculations.

This report conducts a forensic financial investigation, deconstructing the arc of Seagal’s wealth from its peak to its present state.

By examining box office receipts, real estate records, controversial business dealings, SEC filings, and geopolitical entanglements, it will piece together the evidence to solve the $16 million paradox.

This is the story of how a financial fortress was built and why, over two decades, its foundations systematically crumbled.

Part I: The Golden Era – Forging a Fortune at the Box Office (1988-2001)

Steven Seagal’s entry into Hollywood was nothing short of explosive.

His debut film, Above the Law (1988), was a commercial triumph, grossing nearly $19 million in the United States on a relatively modest budget.⁶

The film immediately established a profitable formula: a charismatic, seemingly invincible hero with a unique martial arts style, wrapped in a straightforward action-thriller plot.

Warner Bros. had found a new, bankable star, and for the next several years, this formula minted money.

The period between 1988 and 1992 marked the zenith of Seagal’s financial power and cultural relevance.

He delivered a string of major hits that solidified his A-list status and built the foundation of his fortune.

Films like Hard to Kill (1990) grossed over $47 million, Marked for Death (1990) brought in $43 million, and Out for Justice (1991) earned nearly $40 million on a $14 million budget.⁶

The commercial peak of his career came with

Under Siege in 1992.

The film was a critical and box office behemoth, grossing over $83 million in the U.S. and a massive $156 million worldwide, cementing Seagal’s position as one of the world’s top action stars.¹

However, a closer examination of his box office performance reveals that the first cracks in his financial fortress began to appear long before his eventual transition to direct-to-video (DTV) films.

While the sequel, Under Siege 2: Dark Territory (1995), was successful with a $50 million U.S. gross, it failed to match the financial heights of its predecessor.⁶

The films that followed showed a clear pattern of diminishing returns.

The Glimmer Man (1996) grossed just over $20 million, and Fire Down Below (1997) managed only $16 million domestically.⁶

This downward trend signaled that the audience for his brand of action hero was shrinking at the A-list theatrical level.

Though

Exit Wounds (2001) provided a surprising late-career resurgence, taking in over $51 million and briefly topping the box office, it was an outlier in a period of decline.⁶

The subsequent theatrical release,

Half Past Dead (2002), returned to the downward trajectory, earning a mere $15.5 million.⁶

This erosion of his theatrical drawing power is critical to understanding his financial story.

The common narrative that Seagal simply chose to enter the DTV market is misleading.

The box office data suggests this was not a proactive strategic pivot but a reactive move born of necessity.

With his films consistently underperforming, major studios became increasingly unwilling to risk the significant budgets and marketing costs associated with a wide theatrical release.

The DTV world was not a new frontier he chose to conquer; it was the only viable territory left for him to continue working at a high volume.

Table 1: Steven Seagal’s Peak Theatrical Box Office Performance (1988-2002)

Film Title	Year	Budget	U.S. Gross	Worldwide Gross
Above the Law	1988	N/A	$18,869,631	N/A
Hard to Kill	1990	N/A	$47,381,386	N/A
Marked for Death	1990	N/A	$43,224,499	N/A
Out for Justice	1991	$14,000,000	$39,673,161	N/A
Under Siege	1992	N/A	$83,363,139	$156,400,000
On Deadly Ground	1994	N/A	$38,590,458	N/A
Under Siege 2: Dark Territory	1995	N/A	$50,024,083	N/A
The Glimmer Man	1996	N/A	$20,404,841	N/A
Fire Down Below	1997	N/A	$16,148,906	N/A
Exit Wounds	2001	N/A	$51,758,599	N/A
Half Past Dead	2002	N/A	$15,567,860	N/A

Sources: ⁶

Part II: The DTV Decline – The Economics of Volume over Prestige

Beginning in the early 2000s, Steven Seagal’s career underwent a fundamental transformation, shifting almost exclusively to the direct-to-video (DTV) market.

This move was defined by a specific and calculated business model that prioritized volume over prestige.

Seagal became a pioneer of what the industry dubbed the “geezer teaser”.¹⁰

The formula was ruthlessly efficient: an aging, recognizable movie star is hired for a few days of work, paid a flat fee, and their scenes are strategically interspersed throughout a low-budget film shot primarily with lesser-known actors.

The star’s face and name are then used to sell the movie on generic-looking DVD covers in retail stores and on international streaming platforms.¹⁰

The financial logic behind this model is one of low risk and modest, but reliable, reward.

A film could be produced for a budget of $1-3 million, and with a name like Seagal on the marquee, it was virtually guaranteed to recoup its costs and turn a small profit for the production company through home video sales and, more importantly, pre-sales of international distribution rights.¹¹

This strategy provided Seagal with a steady stream of paychecks for over a decade, allowing him to remain prolific.

However, the salary for each film was a small fraction of the multi-million dollar paydays he commanded during his theatrical peak.

While this approach was financially sustainable in the short term, its long-term effect on Seagal’s brand and earning potential was devastating.

By churning out dozens of formulaic, low-quality films, he actively diluted and devalued his own brand equity.

The name “Steven Seagal,” once associated with major blockbuster events, became synonymous with the bargain bin at video stores.

This systematic erosion of his prestige made any potential comeback to mainstream, high-budget cinema virtually impossible.

Ultimately, the DTV strategy proved to be a financial trap.

It traded long-term brand value for short-term cash flow.

While the consistent work prevented a complete collapse of his income, it locked him into a low-ceiling earning potential.

More critically, it destroyed the very asset—his A-list brand—that could have generated far greater wealth.

Unlike contemporaries who carefully curated their late-career roles to maintain prestige, Seagal’s mass-production approach closed the door on the kinds of opportunities that build lasting fortunes: legacy franchise reboots, high-value corporate endorsements, and ownership stakes in new projects.

It was a strategy for financial survival, not for significant wealth creation.

Part III: The Asset Portfolio – A Chronicle of Real Estate and Risky Ventures

A crucial component of any celebrity’s wealth is their investment portfolio, particularly in real estate.

For many high-net-worth individuals, property is a primary engine of wealth growth.

However, an analysis of Steven Seagal’s known real estate transactions reveals a pattern of stagnation and underperformance, suggesting a focus on lifestyle and persona rather than savvy financial appreciation.

The Real Estate Saga

Seagal’s most famous property was his “bulletproof” fortress in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Purchased in 2010 for $3.5 million, the custom-built, 9,000-square-foot home was a physical manifestation of his on-screen persona, featuring floor-to-ceiling bulletproof glass walls and a fortress-like design embedded into a hillside.¹²

Despite its unique features and dramatic views, the property proved to be a poor investment.

After being listed on and off the market for years, with asking prices as high as $4.25 million, it finally sold in 2021 for $3.55 million.¹⁴

Over an 11-year holding period, this sale represents a negligible return on investment, a significant opportunity cost when accounting for inflation, property taxes, and maintenance.

This was not an isolated incident.

Seagal’s massive 5,329-acre “Lava Lakes Ranch” in Northern California followed a similar pattern of depreciation.

It was initially listed for an ambitious $12 million in 2014 but struggled to find a buyer.

It eventually sold in late 2021 for a price closer to its final, heavily reduced asking price of $7.5 million.¹⁵

Furthermore, reports indicate he sold a 12-acre estate in Tennessee at a loss.¹⁵

This pattern stands in stark contrast to the real estate empires built by peers like Arnold Schwarzenegger, whose portfolio is valued at over $100 million, and highlights a fundamental weakness in Seagal’s wealth management strategy.²

He acquired assets that served his lifestyle but failed to grow in value.

Table 2: Analysis of Key Real Estate Transactions

Property	Purchase Year/Price	Sale Year/Price	Holding Period	Estimated Profit/Loss
Scottsdale, AZ Estate	2010 / $3.5M	2021 / $3.55M	11 years	~$50,000 (Break-even/Loss after costs)
Montague, CA Ranch	N/A	2021 / ~$7.5M	N/A	Sold for significantly less than initial $12M asking price
Tennessee Estate	N/A	2017	N/A	Sold at a reported loss

Sources: ¹²

The Endorsement Trail and Controversial Ventures

Seagal’s ventures into business and endorsements have been similarly underwhelming or outright damaging.

His known deals include a line of clothing with Orange Jeans Co., an energy drink called “Steven Seagal’s Lightning Bolt,” and a cologne named “Scent of Action”.¹⁶

These represent standard, small-scale celebrity licensing deals that were unlikely to be significant, long-term wealth generators.

Far more consequential was his decision to become the “brand ambassador” for a highly questionable cryptocurrency called “Bitcoiin2Gen” (B2G).¹⁷

This venture, which promised high returns and used a pyramid-like diagram to illustrate its business model, would lead Seagal into a direct and damaging confrontation with federal regulators, marking a critical turning point in the erosion of his financial standing and public reputation.¹⁷

Part IV: The Crypto Controversy – A Head-On Collision with the SEC

Steven Seagal’s involvement with the Bitcoiin2Gen (B2G) cryptocurrency culminated in a public and costly legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

In 2018, Seagal began promoting the B2G Initial Coin Offering (ICO) across his social media platforms, encouraging his followers not to “miss out” on the opportunity.¹⁹

However, he failed to disclose a crucial fact: he had been promised $250,000 in cash and $750,000 worth of B2G tokens in exchange for his endorsement.²⁰

This lack of disclosure was a direct violation of federal securities laws.

Specifically, the SEC charged Seagal with violating the anti-touting provisions of the Securities Act of 1933.²¹

This statute makes it unlawful to promote a security without fully disclosing the nature and amount of any compensation received for doing so.

The SEC had issued explicit warnings about this practice in 2017, cautioning that celebrity endorsements of ICOs could be unlawful if they were not transparent about payments.¹⁸

Kristina Littman, Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Cyber Unit, stated, “These investors were entitled to know about payments Seagal received or was promised to endorse this investment so they could decide whether he may be biased”.²⁰

In February 2020, Seagal settled the charges without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings.

The financial penalties included paying $157,000 in disgorgement, which represented the promotional payments he had actually received, plus $16,448.76 in prejudgment interest.

He was also ordered to pay a civil penalty of $157,000, bringing the total cost to over $330,000.²⁰

While the monetary fine was significant, the most damaging consequence of the settlement was reputational.

As part of the agreement, Seagal was banned from promoting any securities, digital or otherwise, for a period of three years.²⁰

This SEC action was a reputational kill shot.

It officially and publicly branded him as a celebrity who would leverage his influence to promote a questionable financial scheme to his fans without the legally required transparency.

This public black mark effectively rendered him toxic to legitimate corporate partners, nuking his credibility for any future high-value endorsement deals—a vital revenue stream that remains open to many of his peers.

The true cost of the Bitcoiin2Gen venture was not the fine itself, but the permanent loss of future earning potential.

Table 3: Financial Breakdown of the SEC Settlement (Bitcoiin2Gen)

Item	Amount
Promised Compensation	$1,000,000 ($250k cash, $750k tokens)
Actual Payments Received	$157,000
Disgorgement (Repayment of earnings)	$157,000
Prejudgment Interest	$16,448.76
Civil Penalty	$157,000
Total Paid to SEC	$330,448.76

Sources: ²⁰

Part V: The Russian Gambit – Citizenship, Sanctions, and Stranded Capital

As his Hollywood star faded, Steven Seagal embarked on a high-risk geopolitical pivot, cultivating deep ties with Russia.

This alignment became a central part of his public persona and, for a time, appeared to be a new financial strategy.

In 2016, Russian President Vladimir Putin personally granted Seagal Russian citizenship, and he was later appointed as a special humanitarian envoy between the two countries.²⁴

Seagal became a vocal supporter of Putin’s policies and a regular presence at state events.²⁵

This political alignment was accompanied by a series of business ventures in Russia.

Corporate records show Seagal was involved with several companies, including Five Elements LLC, Russian Fairs LLC, Steven Seagal Group LLC, and Gorki Investment Company LLC.²⁷

This activity suggests a clear intent to establish a new base of operations and generate income in a sphere where his celebrity still held value.

However, this geopolitical hedge backfired catastrophically.

Following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, sweeping international sanctions were imposed, creating severe legal and financial complications for Seagal as a U.S. citizen.

U.S. law now bars citizens from making new investments in Russia, a restriction that carries significant penalties for violations.²⁷

Consequently, Seagal has been forced to divest from most of his Russian business interests, including resigning as CEO of Five Elements LLC in 2025.²⁷

Even before the most recent wave of sanctions, there were signs of trouble; in 2020, his Russian bank account was reportedly blocked by the country’s tax authorities, indicating pre-existing financial difficulties.²⁴

What may have been conceived as a strategy to find a new financial safe haven has turned into a financial trap.

Instead of providing a new stream of revenue, Russia became a jurisdiction where his capital was likely frozen, devalued, or had to be divested under duress.

The attempt to diversify his opportunities geographically led to a concentrated and catastrophic geopolitical risk, likely erasing a significant portion of his asset portfolio and leaving him with stranded, illiquid, or lost investments.

Part VI: A Comparative Analysis – Why Seagal Stagnated While His Peers Soared

The most illuminating way to understand Steven Seagal’s financial situation is to place it in context with the action-star contemporaries he once stood alongside.

The vast chasm between their fortunes is not a matter of luck, but a direct result of fundamentally different approaches to wealth management and brand stewardship.

While Seagal remained an actor for hire, his peers successfully transitioned into savvy businessmen, investors, and brand owners.

The Schwarzenegger Model: The Investor. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s immense fortune, estimated between $750 million and over $1 billion, was built on a foundation of shrewd investments.²

From his earliest days in America, he poured his earnings into real estate, building a portfolio now worth over $100 million.²

His most significant move, however, was acquiring a stake in the investment firm Dimensional Fund Advisors, a bet that has grown into a massive source of wealth.²

He used his film salary as seed capital for a diversified investment empire.

The Stallone Model: The Brand Owner. Sylvester Stallone’s $400 million net worth is a testament to the power of ownership.³

He didn’t just star in the

Rocky and Rambo films; he created them.

By retaining creative control and ownership stakes in the franchises he built, he earned massive paychecks as an actor, writer, director, and producer, benefiting from backend profits and the long-term value of his intellectual property.²⁹

The Willis Model: The Backend King. Bruce Willis ($250 million net worth) secured his financial legacy with one of the most brilliant deals in Hollywood history.

For the 1999 film The Sixth Sense, he agreed to a lower upfront salary of $14 million in exchange for 17% of the film’s gross box office and home video sales.

This single deal earned him over $100 million, dwarfing what a standard salary could have provided.⁴

It was a masterclass in betting on oneself and leveraging star power for an equity stake.

The Seagal/Van Damme Tier. Seagal’s financial trajectory is most comparable to that of Jean-Claude Van Damme ($40 million net worth).⁵

Both actors remained, for the most part, “actors for hire.” They transitioned to the DTV market, which provided consistent income but actively eroded their brand prestige.¹⁰

Neither successfully built significant outside businesses, diversified investment portfolios, or secured ownership of the properties that made them famous.

This great divergence in financial outcomes was caused by a failure to make the critical leap from “actor” to “businessman.” Schwarzenegger, Stallone, and Willis used their fame and capital as a launchpad to build durable financial infrastructures.

Seagal never made this transition.

His income remained perpetually dependent on his next acting gig, while his forays into business were either small-scale, poorly managed, or, in the case of his crypto venture, legally and reputationally disastrous.

He failed to build the systems necessary to convert his 90s fame into lasting, generational wealth.

Table 4: Net Worth Comparison of 80s/90s Action Icons

Actor	Estimated Net Worth	Primary Wealth Drivers
Arnold Schwarzenegger	$750M – $1.49B	Real Estate Empire, Corporate Investments (Dimensional Fund Advisors), Film Salaries
Sylvester Stallone	$400M	Ownership of Film Franchises (Rocky, Rambo, The Expendables), Producing/Writing Fees, Film Salaries
Bruce Willis	$250M	Savvy Backend Profit Deals (The Sixth Sense), High-Value Film Salaries, Real Estate
Jean-Claude Van Damme	$40M	Film Salaries (Theatrical and DTV), Endorsements
Steven Seagal	$14M – $16M	Film Salaries (Primarily from DTV era), Stagnant Real Estate Portfolio

Sources: ¹

Conclusion: The Final Tally – A Legacy of Diminished Returns

The mystery of Steven Seagal’s modest $16 million net worth is, in the final analysis, not a mystery at all.

It is the logical and inevitable outcome of a two-decade-long pattern of compounding financial missteps and strategic failures.

His financial state is not the result of a single catastrophic event but a death by a thousand cuts, where each decision prioritized short-term cash flow over the cultivation of long-term value.

The financial fortress he built in the early 1990s, founded on box office dominance, proved to be built on weak foundations.

The core issues can be synthesized into four critical failures:

1. A Failure to Evolve: Unlike his peers, Seagal never successfully transitioned from being a high-paid actor to a sophisticated businessman or investor. His wealth remained tied to his ability to secure the next acting job, a model with a perpetually low ceiling.
2. Asset Mismanagement: His real estate portfolio, a key wealth-building tool for most celebrities, was treated more as a collection of lifestyle props than as a growth-oriented investment. A pattern of stagnant or loss-making sales demonstrates a critical failure in asset appreciation.
3. Reputational Self-Sabotage: The foray into the world of cryptocurrency did more than cost him a six-figure fine. The SEC settlement publicly branded him as a tainted promoter, destroying his credibility and closing the door on the lucrative corporate endorsement deals that bolster the fortunes of other stars.
4. A Failed Geopolitical Hedge: His pivot to Russia, likely intended to open new avenues for income, backfired completely. International sanctions transformed his Russian ventures from potential assets into stranded liabilities, trapping his capital and erasing value.

Ultimately, the story of Steven Seagal’s net worth is a cautionary tale about the difference between fame and wealth.

He achieved the former in spectacular fashion but lacked the financial acumen to convert that fame into the latter.

The fortress of his tough-guy persona crumbled under the weight of poor investments, questionable ethics, and a fundamental misunderstanding of how durable fortunes are truly built and maintained.

Works cited

1. Action Star Steven Seagal’s Fortune Has Declined over the Years …, accessed August 10, 2025, https://marketrealist.com/what-caused-a-decline-in-steven-seagals-fame-and-fortune/
2. Arnold Schwarzenegger: 2024 Net Worth, Age, Height & Everything You Need To Know About The Iconic Celebrity – Screen Rant, accessed August 10, 2025, https://screenrant.com/arnold-schwarzenegger-net-worth-2024-age-height-everything-know/
3. Sylvester Stallone Net Worth: How Rich Is the ‘Rocky’ Star? – Men’s Journal, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.mensjournal.com/entertainment/sylvester-stallone-net-worth
4. Bruce Willis Net Worth 2025: Who manages actor’s estate? See his film earnings, endorsements, royalties and wealth – The Economic Times, accessed August 10, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/bruce-willis-net-worth-2025-earnings-wealth-career-health-update-family-estate-inheritance-movies-dementia-television-film-endorsements-royalties-industry-wives-children/articleshow/122862577.cms
5. It Was More Than Muscles That Made Jean-Claude Van Damme One of the Wealthiest Action Stars – Market Realist, accessed August 10, 2025, https://marketrealist.com/what-is-jean-claude-van-dammes-net-worth/
6. Seagal’s Box Office Grosses. – The Modern Warrior-Steven Seagal, accessed August 10, 2025, https://littledragon869.tripod.com/id13.html
7. Steven Seagal – Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Seagal
8. Out for Justice (1991) – Box Office Mojo, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0102614/credits/
9. Steven Seagal Tops US Box Office | Movies – Empire, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.empireonline.com/movies/news/steven-seagal-tops-us-box-office/
10. Examining the direct to video releases of Steven Seagal – MikeyMo, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.mikeymo.nl/movies/articles/examining-the-direct-to-video-releases-of-steven-seagal
11. Why has Steven Seagall been making so many z-grade, direct to video movies? – Reddit, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/15q6iuy/why_has_steven_seagall_been_making_so_many_zgrade/
12. Steven Seagal’s $3.4 million bulletproof estate in Arizona …, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.thenationalnews.com/lifestyle/luxury/steven-seagal-s-3-4-million-bulletproof-estate-in-arizona-international-property-of-the-week-1.1232586
13. Tour Steven Seagal’s remote desert mansion, and find out why it’s BULLETPROOF, accessed August 10, 2025, https://uk.style.yahoo.com/tour-steven-seagals-bulletproof-mansion-160000235.html
14. Inside Steven Seagal’s Former Scottsdale Estate: A Bulletproof Desert Fortress of Luxury, accessed August 10, 2025, https://resident.com/real-estate-news/2025/04/10/steven-seagal-lists-bulletproof-scottsdale-estate-with-panoramic-views-and-martial-arts-mystique
15. Steven Seagal Sells Lava Lakes Ranch in Northern California, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.realtor.com/news/celebrity-real-estate/out-for-a-sale-steven-seagal-sells-california-ranch/
16. Steven Seagal – Complete List of Endorsements – Booking Agent Info, accessed August 10, 2025, https://bookingagentinfo.com/celebrity/steven-seagal/endorsements/
17. Steven Seagal has graduated from shilling for Russian arms to cryptocurrency – VICE, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.vice.com/en/article/steven-seagal-becomes-brand-ambassador-for-bitcoiin2gen/
18. Welp, Steven Seagal is endorsing a cryptocurrency called ‘Bitcoiin’ | Mashable, accessed August 10, 2025, https://mashable.com/article/bitcoiin-steven-seagal-endorsement
19. Actor Steven Seagal Settles With SEC Over Improper Endorsements, accessed August 10, 2025, https://advertisinglaw.fkks.com/post/102g09l/actor-steven-seagal-settles-with-sec-over-improper-endorsements
20. Actor Steven Seagal Charged With Unlawfully Touting … – SEC.gov, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2020-42
21. Steven Seagal – SEC.gov, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2020/33-10760.pdf
22. Guest Post: Takeaways from the SEC’s Fight with Steven Seagal | The D&O Diary, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.dandodiary.com/2020/03/articles/securities-laws/guest-post-takeaways-from-the-secs-fight-with-steven-seagal/
23. Out for justice: action star Steven Seagal fined $330,000 by US financial regulator – City AM, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.cityam.com/out-for-justice-action-star-steven-seagal-fined-330000-by-us-financial-regulator/
24. Steven Seagal’s Russian Account Blocked By Tax Authorities – Reports, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/12/16/steven-seagals-russian-account-blocked-by-tax-authorities-reports-a72376
25. Putin grants Russian citizenship to actor Steven Seagal | AP News, accessed August 10, 2025, https://apnews.com/general-news-celebrity-arts-and-entertainment-d9c1473713544117a28f6d927e911702
26. The Reason Steven Seagal Is Banned From Ukraine – YouTube, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10KU6vmUaXE
27. Steven Seagal Cuts Ties With Russian Business Projects – The …, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/07/22/steven-seagal-cuts-ties-with-russian-business-projects-a89915
28. Arnold Schwarzenegger – Forbes, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/profile/arnold-schwarzenegger/
29. Arnold Schwarzenegger VS Sylvester Stallone Net Worth 2025: Guess Which 70s Superstar Is Still Ruling Hollywood With A Whopping Fortune? – Koimoi, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.koimoi.com/hollywood-news/arnold-schwarzenegger-vs-sylvester-stallone-net-worth-2025-guess-which-70s-superstar-is-still-ruling-hollywood-with-a-whopping-fortune/
30. I’m not crying for Sylvester Stallone whose net worth is said to be around $400 million. But I am amazed that he sees very little of the overall profits from the Rocky Saga’s 8 movies. : r/rockybalboa – Reddit, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/rockybalboa/comments/go0h3y/im_not_crying_for_sylvester_stallone_whose_net/
31. Bruce Willis Net Worth: How Rich is Die Hard’s Star? – MoneyMade, accessed August 10, 2025, https://moneymade.io/learn/articles/bruce-willis-net-worth/
32. Here’s How Much Jean-Claude Van Damme Is Actually Worth – Grunge, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.grunge.com/173932/heres-how-much-jean-claude-van-damme-is-actually-worth/
33. World’s richest actor is a 77-yr-old with no film in years but $1.49B wealth; beat Tom Cruise, Shah Rukh, Dwayne Johnson – Hindustan Times, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/hollywood/worlds-richest-actor-arnold-schwarzenegger-net-worth-1-49-billion-terminator-tom-cruise-shah-rukh-khan-dwayne-johnson-101746518319535.html