Table of Contents
Introduction: The Talentless Paradox
There exists a central and compelling paradox in the public and financial life of Scott Disick.
For over a decade, he was a fixture in global pop culture, a man famous, in large part, for a perceived lack of professional ambition.
The long-running question, often posed with a mix of derision and genuine curiosity by fans and even his own reality TV family, was simple: “What does Scott Disick actually do for a living?”.1
Yet, this is the same man who, as of 2024, commands an estimated net worth of $45 million.2
This fortune was not passively acquired; it was constructed.
The ultimate manifestation of this paradox, and the key to understanding his financial journey, is his most successful entrepreneurial venture to date: a multimillion-dollar clothing line ironically, and brilliantly, named ‘Talentless’.1
Disick’s wealth is not the result of a single, definable talent in the traditional sense.
It is, rather, the product of a complex and often misunderstood synergy of four distinct factors.
First, a foundational inheritance provided him with a crucial financial cushion and early capital that many aspiring entrepreneurs lack.
Second, his strategic proximity to the Kardashian media dynasty gave him an unparalleled global platform, transforming him from an anonymous East Coast socialite into a household name.
Third, he demonstrated a masterful ability to monetize a carefully cultivated on-screen persona, turning his “Lord Disick” character into a high-margin, direct-to-consumer product.
Finally, beneath the veneer of aristocratic leisure, he has revealed a surprisingly shrewd and self-aware entrepreneurial instinct, learning from early failures to launch ventures that directly capitalize on his unique public narrative.
This report will deconstruct the architecture of Scott Disick’s financial empire.
It will trace the origins of his wealth, from the debated scale of his family money to the incalculable value of the Kardashian launchpad.
It will analyze the monetization of his ‘Lord’ persona and provide a granular deep dive into his business portfolio, examining the runaway success of ‘Talentless,’ the calculated risks of his real estate ventures, and the lessons from his commercial flops.
By anatomizing the composition of his $45 million net worth and placing his career in the context of the wider celebrity-entrepreneur landscape, a clear picture emerges: that of a man who built a tangible fortune by weaponizing the very criticisms leveled against him.
The Foundation: New York Money and Kardashian Proximity
Before “Lord Disick” became a brand and ‘Talentless’ a company, Scott Disick’s financial trajectory was set by two foundational pillars: the capital he came from and the platform he married into.
The interplay between his inherited financial standing and the exposure granted by Keeping Up with the Kardashians created the unique conditions necessary for his subsequent success.
One provided the seed capital and the other, the global stage.
A. The Disick Inheritance: Fact, Fiction, and Public Perception
The official narrative of Scott Disick’s origins is one of East Coast affluence.
Born in Eastport, New York, he was the only child of Jeffrey and Bonnie Disick and grew up in the orbit of the prestigious Hamptons.3
His family had deep roots in real estate development; his grandfather, David Disick, was a prominent luxury property developer and Wall Street attorney, a business his father also pursued.3
This upbringing provided Scott with a comfortable lifestyle and, crucially, early exposure to property investment, which would become a cornerstone of his own portfolio years later.3
This financial foundation became a significant source of capital following personal tragedy.
In late 2013 and early 2014, Disick lost both of his parents within three months.3
As an only child, he was the primary heir to his parents’ fortune, which has been widely estimated at $25 million.3
While the exact amount he received is not publicly disclosed, this inheritance provided a substantial financial injection that secured his wealth independent of his television earnings.3
However, coexisting with this official story is a persistent counter-narrative, largely fueled by public forums and fan communities, that questions the true scale and nature of the Disick family wealth.9
Skeptics point to his father’s alleged legal troubles and the relatively modest sale price of a family home as evidence that the “Hampton’s elite” image was exaggerated.10
In the early seasons of
Keeping Up with the Kardashians, Kris Jenner’s on-screen complaints about Scott’s apparent lack of a job fueled the perception that he was financially dependent on Kourtney and her family, a “hanger-on” with an ambiguous source of income.11
The disconnect between the reported $25 million inheritance and the public’s skepticism created a narrative vacuum that would prove immensely valuable.
For years, the question “What does Scott do?” was a recurring plotline on the show and a constant topic of media speculation.1
This ambiguity, rather than being a liability, became an unintentional, decade-long marketing campaign.
The public’s doubt and curiosity cultivated a mystique around his professional life.
He was not just another reality star; he was a man of mystery whose wealth seemed both apparent in his lifestyle and questionable in its origin.
This very ambiguity laid the groundwork for his most successful business, ‘Talentless,’ which served as a direct, ironic, and ultimately profitable answer to the question everyone was asking.
The murky origins of his wealth were not a weakness to be overcome but a brand asset in the making, a unique case study in how public perception—even when critical or skeptical—can be transformed into a core brand identity.
B. The Kardashian Launchpad: From Boyfriend to Brand
If family money provided the financial runway, his relationship with Kourtney Kardashian and his subsequent role on Keeping Up with the Kardashians (KUWTK) provided the rocket fuel.
Beginning in 2007, Disick became a main cast member on what would become one of the most influential reality television shows in history.4
He was a fixture on KUWTK for its entire run (2007-2021) and appeared in its numerous spin-offs, including
Kourtney and Kim Take Miami and Kourtney and Khloé Take The Hamptons.4
His earnings from the show were substantial and grew over time.
While his initial salary is unknown, by the final seasons, the Kardashian family was collectively earning a reported $30 million per season.7
Disick’s value as a core cast member was significant enough that he reportedly negotiated for an “outrageous amount of money” to continue his role in the family’s new Hulu series,
The Kardashians.7
One rumor even suggested he was paid $2 million specifically for his on-screen reaction to Kourtney’s engagement, highlighting his perceived value in driving drama and viewership.13
More important than any single paycheck, however, was the platform.
The show gave Disick immense and sustained global exposure, building him a fan base and making his name recognizable in millions of households.3
This platform was the essential prerequisite for every subsequent income stream he would develop.
His ability to command six-figure appearance fees, secure lucrative social media endorsements, and launch consumer brands was entirely contingent on the celebrity status conferred upon him by the Kardashian media machine.
Without KUWTK, Scott Disick would have remained a wealthy but anonymous individual; with it, he became a brand.
The Business of Being ‘The Lord’: Monetizing a Persona
With a financial foundation and a global platform secured, Scott Disick embarked on his first major entrepreneurial phase: the direct monetization of his on-screen personality.
He astutely recognized that his character on Keeping Up with the Kardashians—a witty, acerbic, and ostentatiously dressed man with a taste for the finer things—was a marketable asset.
This led to the creation of the “Lord Disick” persona, a brand he would leverage into a highly profitable, low-overhead revenue stream that served as a crucial financial bridge between his television salary and his later, more complex business ventures.
A. The Birth of the Lordship
The “Lord Disick” persona was officially born on a 2012 episode of KUWTK during a trip to London.
In a memorable scene, Disick purchased an online knighting ceremony, complete with the acquisition of a small plot of land, to officially, if not legally, become a “Lord”.4
While the title holds no actual aristocratic standing and is available for purchase online, Disick masterfully integrated it into his public identity.16
It was a piece of performance art that perfectly encapsulated his on-screen character’s blend of absurdity and aspiration.
He immediately began to build a brand around the title.
In 2013, he launched a web series, Lord Disick: Lifestyles of a Lord, a spin-off that saw him showing off his luxury car collection and dispensing “tips” to viewers on how to live lavishly.4
This content cemented the “Lord” brand as being synonymous with an over-the-top, aspirational lifestyle.
He was no longer just Scott, Kourtney’s boyfriend; he was Lord Disick, an arbiter of luxury.
This brand differentiation would prove incredibly lucrative.
B. The Appearance Economy: Cashing in on Celebrity
The “Lord” persona became a tangible product that Disick sold to the highest bidder in the appearance economy.
At the peak of his popularity, he was one of the world’s best-known “professional partiers,” commanding enormous fees for simply showing up at nightclubs and events.17
For a single appearance at U.S. hotspots like 1OAK in Las Vegas or Harrah’s in Atlantic City, he could earn between $70,000 and $80,000 a night.4
His international appeal was even more profitable; a series of appearances in the United Kingdom netted him a reported $250,000.4
This monetization extended to the digital realm.
With millions of followers on social media, he became a sought-after influencer.
By 2016, his fee for a single sponsored Instagram post was estimated to be between $15,000 and $20,000.7
This income stream was not without its pitfalls, as evidenced by an infamous incident where he accidentally copied and pasted the brand’s instructions directly into his caption for a Bootea ad, revealing the transactional and sometimes clumsy nature of the business.7
These extraordinary fees, particularly for a reality star without a traditional talent like singing or acting, were a direct result of the “Lord” brand.21
Nightclubs weren’t just paying for “Scott from the Kardashians”; they were paying for the specific brand of aristocratic-themed debauchery that “Lord Disick” represented.
He was selling an experience, an aspirational night O.T. This business model was remarkably efficient, requiring minimal overhead beyond the cost of a plane ticket and the initial investment of cultivating the persona on television.
In this sense, the appearance economy was not merely a side hustle for Disick; it was his first major entrepreneurial success.
He created a distinct personal brand, differentiated it from his peers, and sold it as a high-margin, low-effort service to nightlife and social media clients, demonstrating an early, intuitive grasp of brand creation and value capture.
The following table quantifies the raw financial power of this persona-driven business model during its peak.
| Income Source | Reported Fee Range (Per Event/Post) | Key Markets/Platforms | Source Snippet(s) |
| U.S. Nightclub Appearances | $70,000 – $80,000 | Las Vegas, Atlantic City | 4 |
| International (UK) Appearances | $250,000 (for a series) | United Kingdom | 7 |
| Sponsored Instagram Posts | $15,000 – $20,000 | 7 | |
| TV Guest Appearances | $500,000 (asking price) | Dancing With The Stars | 7 |
The Entrepreneurial Portfolio: A Tale of Hits, Flips, and Flops
After establishing a powerful revenue stream by monetizing his persona, Scott Disick transitioned into more traditional, yet uniquely branded, entrepreneurial ventures.
This phase of his career reveals a more complex business acumen, marked by a blockbuster success, a calculated foray into his family’s trade of real estate, and several notable failures.
This balanced scorecard demonstrates an evolution from simply cashing in on fame to building tangible, asset-backed businesses.
A. The Crown Jewel: The Surprising Genius of ‘Talentless’
Launched in 2018, the clothing line ‘Talentless’ is Disick’s signature business achievement and the clearest expression of his unique approach to branding.4
The company sells high-quality casual wear—primarily T-shirts, sweatshirts, and sweatpants—a market crowded with celebrity lines.4
What sets ‘Talentless’ apart is its name, a self-aware and defiant jab at the years of criticism he faced.
As Disick himself explained, the name was intended as “a big F-you to everybody in the world that basically said that anybody that was in the reality business 10, 15 years ago didn’t have talent”.4
This masterstroke in branding transformed a long-standing public narrative from a personal critique into a marketable identity.1
The brand’s success has been reportedly significant.
One market analysis from a social media source claimed staggering metrics, including “289% year-over-year growth,” a “13.3x return on ad spend (ROAS)” on Google ads, and a “304% return” on Facebook ads, establishing it as a “multimillion-dollar company”.1
The brand’s growth strategy included leveraging the PR acumen of Kris Jenner and expanding its retail footprint internationally, launching in the U.K. through prominent streetwear retailers like Flannels.1
Adding a layer of social consciousness, the company also commits to donating 3% of every sale to the non-profit organization “Fuck Cancer”.4
The success of ‘Talentless’ is rooted in a sophisticated “anti-brand” brand strategy.
Unlike many celebrity ventures that are built on aspirational perfection, ‘Talentless’ is founded on an admission of perceived imperfection.
Its name is literally a pejorative.
This approach perfectly aligns with a cultural shift, particularly among Millennial and Gen Z consumers, that values authenticity, relatability, and self-deprecation over polished artifice.
By leaning into the joke that had followed him for a decade, Disick disarmed his critics and created a brand that felt more genuine than a traditionally glossy celebrity endorsement.
The minimalist aesthetic—”plain tees, plain hoodies, no logo”—further reinforces this ethos, shifting the focus to the product’s quality rather than overt celebrity branding.1
‘Talentless’ succeeded not in spite of its name, but precisely because of it.
It stands as a powerful case study in modern marketing, demonstrating how to build a resonant brand by subverting the very expectations of celebrity and entrepreneurship.
B. Bricks, Mortar, and Television: The Economics of ‘Flip It Like Disick’
Drawing on his family’s deep roots in real estate, Disick formalized his interest in property development with a high-profile venture into luxury house flipping.3
This endeavor was televised in 2019 on the E! reality series
Flip It Like Disick, which followed him and his team—including his friend and business partner Benny Luciano and interior designer Willa Ford—as they renovated high-end homes in the Los Angeles area.4
The show served a dual purpose: it was a business in itself, and it was a marketing platform for his flipping projects.
A well-documented project from this period provides a clear financial case study of his real estate operations.
In 2018, Disick purchased a dated property in the exclusive Hidden Hills community for $3.235 million.26
He undertook an extensive renovation, transforming it into a contemporary farmhouse.
Initially ambitious, he listed the home in September 2019 for $6.89 million, aiming to more than double his investment.26
However, the market dictated a different outcome.
After several price reductions over the following year, the property eventually sold in late 2020 for $5.6 million.12
While he fell short of his initial goal, the flip was still a profitable enterprise.
Financial analysis based on industry metrics suggests that with renovation costs estimated at around $1 million, the project likely yielded a net profit of “somewhere under seven figures,” representing a respectable return on investment of approximately 20% to 25%.26
One real estate expert described the deal as “a little thin, but still profitable at exit”.26
This venture demonstrates tangible business activity and a capacity to generate significant, if not spectacular, profits in a competitive market.
The table below provides a detailed financial breakdown of this Hidden Hills flip, illustrating the numbers behind the narrative.
| Metric | Dollar Amount / Details | Source Snippet(s) |
| Purchase Price (2018) | $3,235,000 | 26 |
| Initial Listing Price (2019) | $6,890,000 | 26 |
| Final Sale Price (2020) | $5,600,000 | 12 |
| Gross Profit (Sale – Purchase) | $2,365,000 | Calculated |
| Estimated Renovation & Closing Costs | ~$1,450,000 (incl. ~$1M remodel + commissions/fees) | 26 |
| Estimated Net Profit | ~$915,000 | Calculated |
| Profit Margin (Estimated) | ~16.3% on final sale price | Calculated |
| Expert Analysis Summary | “A little thin, but still profitable at exit.” | 26 |
C. The Ventures Left Behind: A Balanced Scorecard
Not all of Disick’s business endeavors have been successful.
His portfolio includes several ventures that were either short-lived or failed to gain significant traction, providing important context for his overall entrepreneurial journey.
The most prominent example is his foray into the restaurant industry.
In 2012, Disick opened RYU, a Japanese restaurant in New York City’s trendy Meatpacking District.12
The venture’s development and grand opening were featured as a storyline on
Kourtney and Kim Take New York, guaranteeing significant initial publicity.4
Despite the high-profile launch, the restaurant was a flop, closing its doors permanently after just 191 days.29
A representative for Disick stated that he had sold his shares in the business before its closure, citing his inability to be in New York frequently enough to oversee it.29
The failure of RYU is a key example of an early business attempt that did not last.30
Prior to this, Disick was involved in what he described as “private label manufacturing in the nutrition biz”.29
He claimed to run multiple companies in the vitamin world, including brands like QuickTrim, Rejuvacare, and Monte Carlo Perpetual Tan.4
He also held the title of “president” of Calabasas Luxury Cars, a business owned by his close friend Benny Luciano, though the exact nature and success of his involvement remain somewhat opaque.4
A clear pattern emerges from analyzing Disick’s ventures, both successful and not.
He consistently employs a “platform-first” business model.
Unlike traditional entrepreneurs who build a business and may later get a show to promote it, Disick often uses the television show as the launchpad for the business itself.
The development of RYU was a plot point, the genesis of ‘Talentless’ was discussed on camera, and Flip It Like Disick was an entire series built around his real estate activities.4
This model guarantees massive initial exposure but carries inherent risks.
Early ventures like RYU seem to have been conceived more for a compelling storyline than for long-term business viability.
His later successes, however, suggest a learning curve.
With ‘Talentless’ and his real estate projects, he has demonstrated a more mature ability to convert the initial media spotlight into sustainable and profitable business structures, moving from ventures that served the show to ventures that the show served.
The Anatomy of a $45 Million Fortune
Synthesizing the diverse and evolving income streams—from inheritance and television paychecks to brand equity and real estate profits—provides a holistic financial portrait of Scott Disick.
The consensus among multiple financial media outlets in 2024 places his total net worth at an impressive $45 million.2
This figure represents the culmination of a decade and a half of leveraging fame into fortune.
Asset Allocation
Disick’s wealth is not concentrated in a single area but is spread across several key categories.
A significant portion is held in liquid or semi-liquid assets derived from years of high earnings.
This includes the cumulative salaries from his extensive reality TV career, the substantial fees from his peak years in the appearance economy, and ongoing income from social media endorsements.7
A major component of his net worth is the equity he holds in his primary business venture, the ‘Talentless’ clothing brand.
As a multimillion-dollar company with reported high growth and profitability, his ownership stake represents a significant and appreciating asset.1
Real estate constitutes another critical pillar of his portfolio.
This includes his personal residence—a luxury mansion in Hidden Hills valued at over $8.5 million—as well as capital tied up in ongoing flipping projects and profits realized from past sales.12
Finally, a portion of his net worth is tied up in luxury personal assets, most notably his extensive and valuable collection of high-end automobiles.
His garage, which has been featured in media tours, includes vehicles from manufacturers like Rolls-Royce, Maybach, Ferrari, and Bentley.4
While personal property, these cars also function as brand-building tools, reinforcing the “Lord Disick” image of opulent living and contributing to his overall public persona.
The table below offers an estimated breakdown of the composition of Scott Disick’s $45 million net worth, illustrating the relative weight of each component of his financial empire.
| Asset Category | Estimated Value (USD) | Percentage of Net Worth | Key Components & Rationale |
| ‘Talentless’ Brand Equity | $15M – $18M | ~33% – 40% | Based on its status as a “multimillion-dollar company” with high growth. This valuation reflects the primary engine of his current entrepreneurial wealth. |
| Real Estate Holdings | $10M – $12M | ~22% – 27% | Includes his primary Hidden Hills residence (est. $8.5M+), profits from flips (e.g., the ~$915k net from one project), and other potential property investments. |
| Media & Appearance Earnings (Invested Capital) | $8M – $10M | ~18% – 22% | Represents the accumulated and invested capital from years of high salaries from TV shows, six-figure appearance fees, and endorsements. |
| Inheritance & Family Capital | $5M – $7M | ~11% – 16% | A conservative estimate of the net, after-tax capital inherited from his parents’ estimated $25M estate, serving as his foundational wealth. |
| Luxury Assets & Other Ventures | $2M – $4M | ~4% – 9% | Includes the market value of his extensive luxury car collection and any residual value or investments from past ventures like nightlife or vitamin companies. |
Note: The figures above are estimations based on publicly available information and expert analysis, designed to illustrate the likely composition of his wealth.
The Disick Anomaly: A Comparative Analysis in Celebrity Entrepreneurship
Scott Disick’s path to a $45 million fortune is not entirely unique; the pipeline from reality television fame to entrepreneurial success is a well-trodden one.
Stars from across the genre have leveraged their platforms to build formidable businesses.
Bethenny Frankel of The Real Housewives of New York turned a mention of a cocktail recipe into the SkinnyGirl empire, Kim Kardashian transformed her style influence into the billion-dollar shapewear brand Skims, and Lauren Conrad of The Hills built a successful fashion and lifestyle brand with Kohl’s.14
However, a closer analysis reveals that Disick’s model is an anomaly, distinguished by its methodology, its dependencies, and its core branding philosophy.
Points of Comparison
Disick’s approach differs from his peers in several crucial ways.
First is the distinction between skill-based and persona-based ventures.
Many successful reality star entrepreneurs leveraged a tangible skill that was either pre-existing or honed on their show.
Bethenny Frankel was a natural foods chef, and Project Runway‘s Christian Siriano was a designer.14
Their businesses were logical extensions of their demonstrated expertise.
Disick, in contrast, possessed no such conventional, marketable skill.
His primary “talent” was the cultivation of a personality.
His businesses, therefore, are not built on craftsmanship but on pure brand marketing, making his success a testament to the power of narrative over technical ability.35
Second is the symbiotic nature of his brand.
While many stars, including those in the Kardashian-Jenner orbit, eventually build brands that achieve a degree of independence, Disick’s success remains deeply intertwined with the family’s media ecosystem.
His relevance, and by extension the value of his ventures, is still heavily influenced by his continued presence on The Kardashians and his role as the father of Kourtney’s children.
He is not a breakaway star but a permanent, albeit sometimes peripheral, satellite in the Kardashian universe.
Finally, his branding strategy stands in stark contrast to those around him.
The Kardashian-Jenner empire is built on aspirational branding—selling perfection, beauty, and an idealized lifestyle through brands like Skims and Good American.
Disick chose the opposite path.
The ‘Talentless’ brand is founded on self-deprecation and irony.
This deliberate choice to build a brand around a critique highlights a unique marketing savvy and sets him apart even from within his own extended family’s business ventures.
This leads to a more profound understanding of his model.
Traditional celebrity entrepreneurs use their influence to sell a product or service.
Scott Disick’s entire career, however, can be viewed as an extended influencing campaign where his influence is the product.
His first major commercial success was selling his lifestyle via the “Lord” persona at club appearances.
His most significant business, ‘Talentless,’ is a direct commentary on his status as an influencer.
Even his real estate show, Flip It Like Disick, was as much about selling the aspirational “Disick lifestyle” as it was about selling houses.
His ventures are not merely endorsed by his celebrity; they are extensions and meta-commentaries on his celebrity itself.
He is not a celebrity who happened to become an entrepreneur; he is an entrepreneur whose primary and most successful business has always been the management, packaging, and monetization of the Scott Disick narrative.
Conclusion: The Sustainability of the Lord’s Empire
The financial biography of Scott Disick is a modern parable of fame, branding, and wealth creation.
The journey from a controversial television boyfriend with ambiguous financial origins to a $45 million entrepreneur is a testament to a unique and surprisingly resilient business model.
His success is not accidental, nor is it solely the result of privilege.
It is the calculated outcome of leveraging four key pillars: a foundational inheritance that provided early capital, the unparalleled media exposure granted by the Kardashian dynasty, the shrewd monetization of a carefully crafted “Lord” persona, and an evolved entrepreneurial instinct that learned to turn public criticism into a core brand identity with ‘Talentless’.
Disick has proven to be neither the simple “hanger-on” his early critics claimed nor a traditional business mogul.
He is a complex case study in 21st-century celebrity.
He represents a hyper-modern form of entrepreneur who understood that in the attention economy, the narrative is the asset.
He mastered the art of being famous for being famous, and then, against all expectations, he successfully packaged and sold every aspect of his public life—including its flaws and criticisms—to build a tangible, multimillion-dollar empire.
However, the future sustainability of this empire faces new challenges.
The “platform-first” model that has served him so well is inherently dependent on the platform’s stability.
As his role within the core Kardashian narrative inevitably shifts following Kourtney Kardashian’s marriage and new family focus, his relevance may wane.9
The central question becomes: can his brands, particularly ‘Talentless’, survive and thrive independently of his proximity to the Kardashian media machine? Is the ‘Talentless’ brand strong enough to be a standalone fashion entity, or is it a fad intrinsically tied to his peak celebrity?
His legacy, therefore, is still being written.
He has already achieved a level of financial success that few reality television personalities ever will.
The final verdict will depend on his ability to transition from an entrepreneur whose business is his own celebrity to a businessman whose celebrity is merely one asset among many.
Whether he can successfully navigate this next chapter will determine if the Lord’s ledger is a story of a brilliant, meteoric rise or the foundation of a lasting dynasty.
Works cited
- Scott Disick’s Journey to a Multimillion Dollar Brand – TikTok, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.tiktok.com/@storeya.com/video/7212660032704367879
- www.realitytea.com, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.realitytea.com/2024/07/02/scott-disick-net-worth-2024-the-kardashians-money-make-have-earnings/#:~:text=Scott%20Disick%20has%20an%20estimated%20net%20worth%20of%20%2445%20million%20in%202024.
- Scott Disick: From Reality TV Stardom to a $45 Million Empire – BBN Times, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.bbntimes.com/financial/scott-disick-from-reality-tv-stardom-to-a-45-million-empire
- Scott Disick – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Disick
- What’s Scott’s backstory? : r/KUWTK – Reddit, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/KUWTK/comments/ql4sb6/whats_scotts_backstory/
- What was Scott Disick’s job? : r/KUWTK – Reddit, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/KUWTK/comments/vfdvy1/what_was_scott_disicks_job/
- Scott Disick’s Net Worth in 2025 Is Fit for a Lord! Here’s How He Earned It – Parade, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://parade.com/1363926/hannah-southwick/scott-disick-net-worth/
- Why Is Scott Disick Rich? His Net Worth And Inheritance Explained | IBTimes, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.ibtimes.com/why-scott-disick-rich-his-net-worth-inheritance-explained-3225302
- Scott is panicking about losing the family because his situation mirrors the Caitlyn situation : r/KUWTK – Reddit, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/KUWTK/comments/ukftak/scott_is_panicking_about_losing_the_family/
- I don’t follow Scott but I have a serious question about his “inheritance”. : r/KUWTK – Reddit, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/KUWTK/comments/o78zkv/i_dont_follow_scott_but_i_have_a_serious_question/
- Isn’t it insane that majority of people think Scott has been broke and …, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/KUWTK/comments/1ji01ih/isnt_it_insane_that_majority_of_people_think/
- Scott Disick Net Worth 2024: How Much Money Does The Kardashians Star Make?, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.realitytea.com/2024/07/02/scott-disick-net-worth-2024-the-kardashians-money-make-have-earnings/
- Scott Disick Allegedly Got $2 Million For His Reaction To Kourtney Kardashian’s Engagement On New Hulu Show – Reddit, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/KUWTKsnark/comments/t7h393/scott_disick_allegedly_got_2_million_for_his/
- Reality TV Stars Turned Entrepreneurs – Forbes, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/2010/04/13/reality-tv-celebrity-fame-forbes-woman-entrepreneurs-business.html
- Scott Disick Birthday – National Today, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://nationaltoday.com/birthday/scott-disick/
- Has Kourtney Kardashian’s boyfriend Scott Disick been knighted in London? Why is he called Lord Disick? – Quora, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.quora.com/Has-Kourtney-Kardashian-s-boyfriend-Scott-Disick-been-knighted-in-London-Why-is-he-called-Lord-Disick
- www.chron.com, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.chron.com/culture/celebrities/article/How-much-money-celebrities-make-Kardashians-disick-7230442.php#:~:text=%E2%80%9CHe%20could%20pull%20%2470%2C000%20or,of%20appearances%20in%20the%20UK.%E2%80%9D&text=Disick%20is%20one%20of%20the%20world’s%20best%2Dknown%20professional%20partiers.
- How much money celebrities make just by showing up at clubs – Chron, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.chron.com/culture/celebrities/article/How-much-money-celebrities-make-Kardashians-disick-7230442.php
- How Much Scott Disick Earns For One Club Appearance – ELLE Australia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.elle.com.au/culture/celebrity/how-much-scott-disick-earns-for-one-club-appearance-4441/
- Scott Disick’s Fails at Influencer Marketing on Instagram – Traackr, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.traackr.com/blog/why-scott-disicks-instagram-fail-is-everything-wrong-with-influencer-marketing
- How Much Do Rappers & Celebrities Make From A Club Appearance? – HotNewHipHop, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/462828-how-much-do-rappers-and-celebrities-make-from-a-club-appearance-news
- Scott Disick – Age, Personal Life & Facts – Biography, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.biography.com/movies-tv/scott-disick
- KUWTK: All Scott Disick’s Business Moves After The Show Ended – Screen Rant, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://screenrant.com/scott-disick-business-moves-talentless-after-kuwtk-finale/
- Scott Disick is the ecommerce king. His brand talentless is making ser… – TikTok, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.tiktok.com/@storeya.com/video/7400309935021542674
- Flip It Like Disick – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flip_It_Like_Disick
- Did Scott Disick Pull Off a Successful Flip in Hidden Hills? We Do …, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.realtor.com/news/celebrity-real-estate/did-scott-disick-pull-off-a-successful-flip-in-hidden-hills-we-do-the-math/
- Scott Disick’s New Flip, a Stunning Contemporary Farmhouse, Hits the Market for $6.89 Million – Fancy Pants Homes, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.fancypantshomes.com/celebrity-homes/scott-disicks-new-flip-a-stunning-contemporary-farmhouse-hits-the-market-for-6-89-million/
- Scott Disick Net Worth 2023: What Is The Kardashians Star Worth? – HotNewHipHop, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/692598-scott-disick-net-worth
- How Did Scott Disick Make His Money? Info on His Net Worth, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://marketrealist.com/p/how-did-scott-disick-make-his-money/
- Can we name all the failed Kardashian businesses that come to mind? : r/KUWTK – Reddit, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/KUWTK/comments/vr47tc/can_we_name_all_the_failed_kardashian_businesses/
- Scott Disick – Biography – HELLO! Magazine, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.hellomagazine.com/profiles/201408141093/scott-disick/
- Scott Disick’s Secret Business Uncovered By Kourtney Kardashian’s Family, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.ibtimes.com.au/scott-disicks-secret-business-uncovered-kourtney-kardashians-family-1436309
- Scott Disick’s Insane $8M Mansion Is All About Luxury | House Tour 2025 – YouTube, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3R1m_qKgkQ&vl=en
- 10 Reality Stars Turned Entrepreneurs – Forbes, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/2010/04/13/reality-tv-celebrity-fame-forbes-woman-entrepreneurs-business_slide.html
- Reality TV Stars Who Can Skyrocket Your Brand in 2025 (And How They Deliver ROI), accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.celebexperts.com/reality-tv-stars-who-can-skyrocket-your-brand-in-2025-and-how-they-deliver-roi/
- Theory: Scott has only wanted Kourtney for the guaranteed paychecks and lifestyle all along : r/KUWTK – Reddit, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/KUWTK/comments/olrkxe/theory_scott_has_only_wanted_kourtney_for_the/
