Table of Contents
Executive Summary
This report provides an exhaustive financial analysis of Lockheed Martin Corporation, examining its corporate valuation from multiple perspectives.
As the world’s largest defense contractor, Lockheed Martin’s worth is a complex interplay of its market leadership, vast contract backlog, and recent, significant operational headwinds.
The company’s valuation, as determined by the public markets, stands at approximately $102.1 billion in market capitalization as of mid-August 2025.
This figure, however, exists in stark contrast to its foundational accounting book value of just $5.33 billion, underscoring the immense premium investors place on intangible assets such as intellectual property, government relationships, and future earnings potential from its long-term contracts.
A more comprehensive measure, Enterprise Value, which accounts for the company’s capital structure, is calculated at approximately $119.33 billion, reflecting a substantial net debt position that adds a layer of financial risk.
The analysis of the company’s recent performance reveals a deeply troubled operational landscape.
The second quarter of 2025 was catastrophic, characterized by $1.6 billion in pre-tax program losses that erased the majority of the company’s profits, resulting in a collapse in GAAP earnings per share to $1.46 from $6.85 in the prior year and a negative free cash flow of $150 million.
This performance has triggered intense investor scrutiny, culminating in a securities class-action lawsuit alleging that the company misled shareholders about its operational capabilities and internal controls.
When benchmarked against its primary competitors—RTX Corporation, The Boeing Company, Northrop Grumman, and General Dynamics—Lockheed Martin’s historical valuation premium appears to be eroding.
While it remains the leader in defense revenue, its market capitalization has been eclipsed by more diversified peers like RTX, and its operational stumbles challenge the justification for its premium valuation multiples.
Ultimately, Lockheed Martin is at a critical inflection point.
Its formidable $166.5 billion backlog provides a path to future revenue, but it also represents a source of immense execution risk.
The company’s future worth is now inextricably linked to its ability to restore operational credibility, resolve its internal control issues, and prove to investors and its government customers that its recent failures were an anomaly, not the new standard.
Deconstructing Lockheed Martin’s Corporate Value
To ascertain the “net worth” of a complex enterprise like Lockheed Martin, a multi-faceted approach is required, moving beyond a single metric to build a holistic picture of its value.
This involves examining its worth through three distinct but interconnected lenses: the market’s perception (Market Capitalization), its theoretical acquisition cost (Enterprise Value), and its foundational accounting value (Book Value).
Market Capitalization: The Public Market’s Verdict
Market Capitalization, or market cap, is the most direct measure of a company’s value as perceived by the public markets.
It represents the collective, real-time consensus of investors on the company’s future earnings potential, strategic position, and risk profile.
The calculation is straightforward: the current stock price multiplied by the total number of outstanding shares.1
As of mid-August 2025, various financial data providers place Lockheed Martin’s market capitalization in a tight range, consolidating to a representative figure of approximately $102.1 billion.1
This valuation places Lockheed Martin as the 196th most valuable publicly traded company in the world.1
This figure is particularly significant as it reflects investor sentiment
after the release of the company’s deeply problematic second-quarter 2025 financial results.
While the operational news was damaging, the market still assigns a substantial nine-figure valuation, signaling a belief in the enduring value of the company’s core assets, its entrenched market position, and its massive contract backlog.
Enterprise Value: A Comprehensive View of Total Worth
While market capitalization reflects the value of a company’s equity, Enterprise Value (EV) offers a more complete assessment of its total worth by incorporating the entire capital structure.
EV is calculated as Market Capitalization plus Total Debt (both short- and long-term), minority interest, and preferred shares, minus Cash and Cash Equivalents.5
It is considered the theoretical takeover price because an acquirer would have to absorb the company’s debt obligations while gaining its cash reserves.7
Using the most recent financial data from the end of the second quarter of 2025, Lockheed Martin’s Enterprise Value can be calculated as follows:
- Market Capitalization: ~$102.1 billion
- Long-Term Debt: $18.52 billion 8
- Cash and Cash Equivalents: $1.29 billion 8
The resulting EV is approximately $119.33 billion ($102.1B + $18.52B – $1.29B).
The fact that the EV is substantially higher than the market cap is a direct result of the company’s significant net debt position of roughly $17.23 billion.
This indicates that any potential acquirer would be assuming a considerable debt burden in addition to paying for the equity.
This level of financial leverage, while common for capital-intensive industrial firms with stable cash flows, can amplify risk during periods of operational volatility, a concern brought to the forefront by the company’s recent performance.
Key valuation ratios derived from EV, such as EV/Sales (1.77) and EV/EBITDA (14.12), are critical for benchmarking against industry peers and will be explored further in a later section.9
Book Value: The Foundational Accounting Worth
Book Value, formally known as Shareholders’ Equity, represents the net worth of a company from a purely accounting standpoint.
It is the residual value that would, in theory, be available to shareholders if all of the company’s assets were liquidated at their balance sheet values and all of its liabilities were paid off.
It is calculated as Total Assets minus Total Liabilities.
Based on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 29, 2025, Lockheed Martin’s book value is calculated as:
- Total Assets: $58.870 billion 10
- Total Liabilities: $53.536 billion 10
This yields a book value of just $5.334 billion.11
The most striking feature of Lockheed Martin’s valuation is the immense chasm between its market value (>$100 billion) and this accounting value.
This disparity is captured by the Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio, which stands at an exceptionally high 19.1.2
This indicates that the market values the company at more than 19 times its net tangible and financial assets as recorded on its books.
This enormous premium is not arbitrary; it is attributable to the vast intangible value that does not appear on the balance sheet.
This includes the company’s intellectual property portfolio, particularly the advanced technologies embedded in platforms like the F-35; its deeply entrenched, multi-decade relationships with the U.S. Department of Defense and allied governments; its unparalleled expertise in systems integration; and, most critically, its multi-year, high-value contract backlog that provides visibility into future revenues.
The valuation of Lockheed Martin is therefore fundamentally a bet on its ability to profitably execute on these intangible strengths, making it highly sensitive to any erosion of confidence in its operational capabilities.
Table 1: Key Valuation Metrics for Lockheed Martin (as of August 2025)
| Metric | Value (USD Billions) | As of Date | Source Snippets |
| Market Capitalization | ~$102.1 | Mid-August 2025 | 1 |
| Enterprise Value (Calculated) | ~$119.33 | Q2 2025 Data | 8 |
| Total Assets | $58.87 | June 29, 2025 | 10 |
| Total Liabilities | $53.54 | June 29, 2025 | 10 |
| Book Value (Shareholders’ Equity) | $5.33 | June 29, 2025 | 11 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio | ~19.1 | August 2025 | 2 |
Historical Valuation and Performance Trajectory (2020-2025)
A static snapshot of a company’s value provides only a partial picture.
To understand its current position and future prospects, it is essential to analyze its valuation trajectory over time, correlating its movements with significant market events and internal performance milestones.
An examination of Lockheed Martin’s market capitalization over the past five years reveals a period of significant volatility, driven by both broad geopolitical tailwinds and, more recently, company-specific challenges.
Five-Year Market Capitalization Trend Analysis
Lockheed Martin’s market capitalization has fluctuated significantly since 2020, reflecting the dynamic nature of the global security environment and the aerospace and defense industry.1
At the end of 2020, the company was valued at approximately $99.3 billion.
After a slight dip in 2021 to $96.3 billion, its valuation surged by over 32% in 2022, reaching a peak of $127.5 billion by year’s end.1
This dramatic increase was not unique to Lockheed Martin but was a sector-wide phenomenon, directly attributable to the onset of the conflict in Ukraine.
The event triggered a fundamental reassessment of global security risks and spurred expectations of significantly increased defense spending by the U.S. and its NATO allies, benefiting all major defense contractors.
However, this peak proved to be unsustainable.
The company’s market cap declined to $112.4 billion by the end of 2023 and, after a modest recovery in 2024 to $115.9 billion, has since fallen to its current level of approximately $102.1 billion as of August 2025.1
This downward trend from the 2022 high suggests a market that is normalizing its expectations and shifting its focus from broad geopolitical themes back to company-specific fundamentals and execution.
The recent negative momentum is stark: the company’s market cap has decreased by over 20% in the past year, and the stock is trading down more than 22% from its 52-week high.4
Over the entire five-year period, the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of its market cap has been a modest 3.01%, indicating that despite the significant volatility and the 2022 rally, long-term value creation has been relatively slow.12
The clear implication is that the powerful geopolitical tailwinds of 2022 may have masked underlying performance weaknesses that are now coming to the forefront.
The pending securities lawsuit against the company alleges that performance issues began to manifest as early as January 2024, a time when the market cap was still relatively elevated.14
The sharp price drop in July 2025, coinciding with the Q2 earnings release, confirms that the market is now reacting forcefully to these specific execution failures.15
Lockheed Martin can no longer rely solely on a favorable global security climate to support its premium valuation; its future worth will be increasingly judged on its ability to deliver consistent, profitable results.
Evolution of Enterprise Value and Capital Structure
The company’s capital structure has also evolved during this period, impacting its Enterprise Value.
Management has engaged in some deleveraging, with long-term debt decreasing from $19.63 billion at the end of 2024 to $18.52 billion by the end of Q2 2025.8
However, this positive step was offset by a sharp deterioration in the company’s cash position.
Cash and cash equivalents fell precipitously from $2.48 billion to $1.29 billion over the same six-month period, a direct consequence of the extremely poor operational cash flow generated in the second quarter.8
This decline in cash has increased the company’s net debt, maintaining upward pressure on its Enterprise Value relative to its market cap and underscoring the financial impact of its recent operational struggles.
Table 2: Historical Market Capitalization & 5-Year CAGR (2020-2025)
| Year-End | Market Cap (USD Billions) | Year-over-Year Change (%) | Source Snippets |
| 2020 | 99.31 | -9.23% | 1 |
| 2021 | 96.31 | -3.02% | 1 |
| 2022 | 127.49 | +32.37% | 1 |
| 2023 | 112.44 | -11.80% | 1 |
| 2024 | 115.90 | +3.07% | 1 |
| Aug 2025 | 102.09 | -11.91% (YTD) | 1 |
| 5-Year CAGR | 3.01% | 12 |
Deep Dive into Financial Health and Operational Drivers
A company’s valuation is ultimately underpinned by its financial health and operational performance.
An examination of Lockheed Martin’s most recent financial results reveals a company grappling with severe execution challenges that have profoundly impacted its profitability and cash generation, raising significant questions about its internal controls and program management.
Analysis of the Q2 2025 Earnings Report: A “Kitchen Sink” Quarter
The second quarter of 2025, described by one analyst as a “‘kitchen sink’ type quarter,” was a period of profound financial distress for Lockheed Martin, where numerous issues were brought to light simultaneously.14
While top-line revenue remained relatively stable at $18.16 billion, a slight increase from $18.12 billion in the prior-year quarter, it missed consensus analyst estimates of $18.56 billion.8
The story, however, was in the catastrophic collapse of the bottom line.
Net earnings plummeted by 79.2% to just $342 million, compared to $1.64 billion in Q2 2024.11
This translated into a GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) diluted earnings per share (EPS) of only $1.46, a fraction of the $6.85 recorded a year earlier.8
The primary driver of this collapse was the recognition of $1.6 billion in pre-tax program losses across two of the company’s four business segments.17
These losses were deconstructed as follows:
- Aeronautics: The segment recognized a staggering $950 million loss on a classified program. This single charge caused the segment’s operating profit to swing from a positive $751 million in Q2 2024 to a loss of $98 million in Q2 2025.16
- Rotary and Mission Systems (RMS): This segment recorded $570 million in losses related to the Canadian Maritime Helicopter Program (CMHP) and additional charges on the Turkish Utility Helicopter Program (TUHP).14 These charges caused the RMS segment’s operating profit to swing from a positive $495 million to a loss of $172 million.19
The operational breakdown extended directly to cash flow.
Cash from operations fell precipitously to just $201 million, down nearly 90% from $1.9 billion in the same period last year.11
Consequently, free cash flow—a critical measure of financial health representing cash available after capital expenditures—turned negative to the tune of $150 million, a stark reversal from a positive $1.5 billion in Q2 2024.16
The company attributed this cash drain primarily to higher working capital requirements, including increased receivables on the F-35 program and higher inventory levels at Sikorsky.18
In a move that highlights the chasm between accounting presentation and operational reality, the company reported an adjusted EPS of $7.29, which beat analyst estimates.8
This figure was reached by excluding the massive program losses and other charges.
However, this “beat” serves to obscure a fundamental operational failure.
For a defense prime contractor, successful program execution and cost management are not “non-operational” or “one-time” events; they are the core of the business.
The negative free cash flow figure, which cannot be easily adjusted, provides a much clearer and more sobering picture of the quarter’s performance: the business consumed cash instead of generating it.
Balance Sheet Integrity and Financial Leverage
The Q2 2025 results put Lockheed Martin’s balance sheet under increased scrutiny.
As established previously, the company operates with a very thin equity base of $5.33 billion against a total asset base of $58.87 billion.10
This structure results in a high Debt-to-Equity ratio of 3.04, indicating a significant reliance on debt to finance its operations.9
While leverage can enhance returns in good times, it increases risk during periods of stress.
The company’s liquidity position is also tight.
With a Current Ratio of 1.08 and a Quick Ratio (which excludes less-liquid inventory) of 0.87, its most liquid assets do not fully cover its short-term liabilities.9
The negative free cash flow experienced in Q2 puts further pressure on this delicate liquidity balance.
Profitability and Efficiency Ratios Under Scrutiny
An analysis of Lockheed Martin’s profitability ratios reveals metrics that require careful interpretation.
The company reports an exceptionally high Return on Equity (ROE) of 82.55%.9
However, this figure is a deceptive “vanity metric.” ROE is calculated as Net Income divided by Shareholders’ Equity.
Due to years of share buybacks and debt-fueled financing, Lockheed Martin has engineered its equity base down to a very small number.
As a result, even a modest amount of net income will produce a dramatically inflated ROE percentage.
A far more meaningful metric for a company with this capital structure is Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which measures returns generated on all capital employed (both debt and equity).
At 17.51%, Lockheed Martin’s ROIC is healthy and provides a much more realistic assessment of its operational efficiency than the misleading ROE figure.9
The Q2 2025 performance, however, decimated profitability margins for the period, with the overall segment operating margin falling to a mere 3.1% and the net profit margin contracting to just 1.88%.11
Table 3: Consolidated Financial Highlights (Q2 2025 vs. Q2 2024)
| Financial Metric | Q2 2025 | Q2 2024 | Y/Y Change (%) | Source Snippets |
| Net Sales (USD Billions) | 18.16 | 18.12 | +0.2% | 8 |
| Net Earnings (USD Millions) | 342 | 1,641 | -79.2% | 11 |
| GAAP Diluted EPS | $1.46 | $6.85 | -78.7% | 8 |
| Adjusted Diluted EPS | $7.29 | $7.11 | +2.5% | 8 |
| Cash from Operations (USD Millions) | 201 | 1,876 | -89.3% | 11 |
| Free Cash Flow (USD Millions) | ($150) | 1,506 | N/A (Negative) | 16 |
Competitive Benchmarking in the Aerospace & Defense Sector
Evaluating Lockheed Martin’s valuation in isolation is insufficient.
A comprehensive analysis requires benchmarking its financial metrics and market standing against its primary competitors.
This comparative view provides crucial context, revealing whether its valuation is in line with, at a premium to, or at a discount to its peers, and how its operational performance stacks up within the industry.
The Peer Group: The “Big Five” Defense Primes
The most relevant peer group for Lockheed Martin consists of the other large, diversified U.S.-based aerospace and defense prime contractors.
These companies often compete for the same large-scale government contracts and are subject to similar market and geopolitical forces.
The primary competitors for this analysis are RTX Corporation (RTX), The Boeing Company (BA), Northrop Grumman (NOC), and General Dynamics (GD).1
Comparative Valuation Analysis
A comparison of market capitalization reveals a clear hierarchy within the sector.
With market caps of approximately $208 billion and $176 billion, respectively, RTX and Boeing are valued significantly higher than the rest of the group.22
Their valuations are supported by their substantial commercial aerospace businesses in addition to their defense operations.
Lockheed Martin, with its market cap of ~$102.1 billion, sits in the next tier, followed closely by the more defense-focused Northrop Grumman (~$83.6 billion) and General Dynamics (~$85.0 billion).1
Examining valuation multiples provides a deeper look at how the market prices these companies relative to their earnings and sales.
Lockheed Martin’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 24.6 is higher than that of Northrop Grumman (~21.9) and General Dynamics (~21.1), suggesting that investors have historically been willing to pay a premium for Lockheed’s earnings stream, likely due to its market leadership and the perceived stability of its F-35 franchise.2
However, this premium is being challenged.
RTX trades at a much higher P/E multiple of over 44, while Boeing’s is not applicable due to its recent net losses.26
The recent operational stumbles at Lockheed Martin put its valuation premium over its direct defense peers at risk, as the market may begin to question whether its execution capabilities still warrant that higher multiple.
Market Leadership and Scale
Despite its recent challenges, Lockheed Martin’s preeminent position in the defense industry remains undisputed.
It is the world’s largest defense contractor by a significant margin based on revenue.20
With defense-related revenues reported between $60.8 billion and $64.7 billion, it surpasses its closest competitors, RTX ($40.7 billion) and Northrop Grumman ($35.6 billion).28
This scale is a powerful competitive advantage, enabling the company to undertake the most complex and technologically advanced programs for the U.S. government.
This leadership is built on the back of “franchise” programs like the F-35 fighter jet, a cornerstone of U.S. and allied air power that is scheduled to remain in service until 2070, providing a multi-decade stream of production and sustainment revenue.30
Table 4: Comparative Valuation and Performance Metrics (LMT vs. Key Competitors)
| Metric | Lockheed Martin (LMT) | RTX Corp (RTX) | Boeing (BA) | Northrop Grumman (NOC) | General Dynamics (GD) | Source Snippets |
| Market Cap (USD B) | ~$102.1 | ~$208.1 | ~$176.3 | ~$83.6 | ~$85.0 | 1 |
| Enterprise Value (USD B) | ~$119.3 | ~$240.4 | ~$204.1 | ~$81.1 (2024) | ~$88.9 | 6 |
| Revenue (TTM USD B) | ~$71.8 | ~$83.6 | ~$75.3 | ~$40.5 | ~$50.3 | 13 |
| P/E Ratio | 24.6 | 44.2 | N/A (-14.8) | ~21.9 | ~21.1 | 2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.1 | 22.4 | N/A (-23.3) | 11.6 (2024) | N/A | 9 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.44 | 2.5 | 2.5 | ~2.1 | ~1.7 | 2 |
Qualitative Factors, Forward-Looking Risks, and Strategic Outlook
A purely quantitative analysis is insufficient to capture the full scope of Lockheed Martin’s value and risk profile.
Qualitative factors, including legal challenges, the nature of its contract backlog, and its strategic positioning, are critical determinants of its future performance and, consequently, its long-term worth.
The Impact of Investor Scrutiny and Legal Challenges
The severe financial impact of the Q2 2025 results has been compounded by a significant legal challenge that strikes at the heart of the company’s credibility.
A securities class-action lawsuit, Khan v.
Lockheed Martin Corporation, has been filed on behalf of investors who acquired the company’s securities between January 23, 2024, and July 21, 2025.14
The core allegations of the lawsuit are severe.
It claims that the company repeatedly misled investors by overstating its ability to deliver on its contractual commitments in terms of cost and schedule.
Crucially, the suit alleges that Lockheed Martin “lacked effective procedures to perform reasonably accurate comprehensive reviews of program requirements, technical complexities, schedule, and risks”.14
This is a direct assault on the company’s internal controls and program management—the very competencies that are supposed to justify its premium valuation.
The lawsuit points to the abrupt departure of Chief Financial Officer Jay Malave in April 2025 as a potential red flag, followed by the “kitchen sink” quarter in July where the massive losses were finally disclosed.14
This legal action represents more than just a potential financial liability from a settlement or judgment.
It creates significant reputational risk, which can erode investor trust and, more importantly, damage the company’s relationship with its primary customer, the U.S. government.
The DoD demands transparency, accountability, and reliable execution from its prime contractors.
Allegations of systemic failures in these areas could lead to heightened government scrutiny on existing programs and a competitive disadvantage in bidding for future contracts.
Contract Backlog and Revenue Visibility
One of Lockheed Martin’s greatest strengths has always been its massive contract backlog, which provides exceptional long-term revenue visibility.
As of the end of the second quarter of 2025, this backlog stood at a formidable $166.53 billion.8
This total is well-diversified across the company’s main business segments:
- Aeronautics: $52.17 billion
- Missiles and Fire Control: $40.25 billion
- Rotary and Mission Systems: $38.58 billion
- Space: $35.53 billion 8
This backlog, which includes recent awards like a $4.23 billion U.S. Army contract modification, is the foundation of the company’s stable revenue base and a key reason for its historical premium valuation.3
However, the recent performance issues have revealed that this backlog is a double-edged sword.
While it represents future revenue, it also embodies immense execution risk.
The $1.6 billion in Q2 losses were recognized on major, long-term programs that are part of this backlog.
This demonstrates that a contract is only valuable if it can be executed profitably.
The market can no longer take the value of the backlog at face value; it must now be discounted by a higher risk factor related to the company’s ability to manage costs and schedules effectively.
The critical question for investors has shifted from “how large is the backlog?” to “how profitable and executable is the backlog?”
Strategic Imperatives and Growth Vectors
Lockheed Martin’s strategy is anchored in its four core business segments and its indispensable role as a technology provider to the U.S. government and its allies.30
The vast majority of its revenue is derived from U.S. federal government agencies, primarily the Department of Defense.30
This creates both stability, as government budgets are typically resilient, and a concentration risk, making the company highly sensitive to shifts in U.S. defense policy and procurement priorities.
To secure its future, the company is heavily invested in developing next-generation technologies critical to 21st-century security, including hypersonics, directed energy weapons, integrated air and missile defense, and advanced cyber solutions.30
Success in these emerging fields will be crucial for replenishing its backlog and maintaining its technological edge over competitors.
Conclusion and Synthesis
The “net worth” of Lockheed Martin Corporation is a contested and multifaceted concept, reflecting a deep schism between its esteemed market position and its troubled present reality.
Quantitatively, the public markets assign the company a value of approximately $102 billion, an enormous premium over its tangible book value of just $5.3 billion.
This premium is a testament to the perceived strength of its intangible assets: its world-class intellectual property, its indispensable relationship with the U.S. military, and its massive $166.5 billion contract backlog that promises years of revenue.
However, this valuation is now under severe threat from a crisis of operational credibility.
The disastrous financial results of the second quarter of 2025, which saw a collapse in profitability and a reversal into negative free cash flow, have exposed deep-seated execution problems within its core Aeronautics and RMS segments.
These are not minor setbacks; they are multi-hundred-million-dollar failures on critical, long-term programs that have called into question the company’s fundamental ability to manage complex projects profitably.
The situation is exacerbated by the pending securities class-action lawsuit and the preceding, abrupt departure of the company’s CFO. Together, these events suggest that the recent problems may be systemic, pointing toward a potential breakdown in the internal controls and corporate governance that are supposed to underpin the company’s reliability.
For a firm whose primary currency is trust—both from investors and from its government clientele—these developments are profoundly damaging.
Lockheed Martin stands at an inflection point.
It remains the largest defense contractor on the globe, with an enviable portfolio of franchise programs and a deep backlog that provides a clear runway for the future.
Yet, its worth is no longer assured by reputation alone.
The company’s valuation is now contingent on its ability to prove that its “kitchen sink” quarter was a decisive and final reset, not the beginning of a sustained trend of underperformance.
It must restore operational discipline, regain the full confidence of its customers, and demonstrate to a skeptical market that it can profitably execute on the very backlog that forms the basis of its premium valuation.
The company’s enduring worth will be determined not by its past achievements, but by its capacity to navigate this present crisis and re-establish the standard of excellence for which it was once known.
Works cited
- Lockheed Martin (LMT) – Market capitalization – Companies Market Cap, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/lockheed-martin/marketcap/
- Lockheed Martin Market Cap Analysis | YCharts, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://ycharts.com/companies/LMT/market_cap
- Lockheed: LMT Stock Price Quote & News – Robinhood, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://robinhood.com/us/en/stocks/LMT/
- Lockheed Martin (LMT) Market Cap & Net Worth – Stock Analysis, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/lmt/market-cap/
- Market Cap of Lockheed Martin Corporation | Bullfincher, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://bullfincher.io/companies/lockheed-martin-corporation/market-cap
- Lockheed Martin Enterprise Value Analysis | YCharts, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://ycharts.com/companies/LMT/enterprise_value
- Lockheed Martin (LMT) Enterprise Value – Zacks.com, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.zacks.com/stock/chart/LMT/fundamental/enterprise-value
- Lockheed Beats on Q2 Earnings, Lowers ’25 EPS View – Nasdaq, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/lockheed-beats-q2-earnings-lowers-25-eps-view
- Lockheed Martin (BMV:LMT) Statistics & Valuation Metrics – Stock Analysis, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/quote/bmv/LMT/statistics/
- Investor Overview | Lockheed Martin Corp, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://investors.lockheedmartin.com/
- Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT) Stock Price & News – Google Finance, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.google.com/finance/quote/LMT:NYSE
- Lockheed Martin (LMT) Market Cap Today: Live Data & Historical Trends, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://public.com/stocks/lmt/market-cap
- Lockheed Martin Corp Stock Price Today | LMT Live Ticker – Investing.com, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.investing.com/equities/lockheed-martin
- Lockheed Martin (LMT) Faces Investor Scrutiny Over Company’s Disclosures About Aeronautics and RMS Segments’ Performance, Securities Class Action Pending — Hagens Berman | Morningstar, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/news/globe-newswire/9513392/lockheed-martin-lmt-faces-investor-scrutiny-over-companys-disclosures-about-aeronautics-and-rms-segments-performance-securities-class-action-pending-hagens-berman
- Lockheed Martin – 48 Year Stock Price History | LMT – Macrotrends, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/LMT/lockheed-martin/stock-price-history
- Lockheed Martin Reports Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://investors.lockheedmartin.com/news-releases/news-release-details/lockheed-martin-reports-second-quarter-2025-financial-results/
- investors.lockheedmartin.com, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://investors.lockheedmartin.com/news-releases/news-release-details/lockheed-martin-reports-second-quarter-2025-financial-results#:~:text=Net%20earnings%20in%20the%20second,%24169%20million%20of%20other%20charges.
- Lockheed Martin reports lower profits and cash flow in Q2 2025 – AviTrader, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://avitrader.com/2025/07/23/lockheed-martin-reports-lower-profits-and-cash-flow-in-q2-2025/
- 2nd Quarter 2025 Conference Call – Lockheed Martin Investor Relations, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://investors.lockheedmartin.com/static-files/3907c99e-b96f-4d05-9cfd-8ce43c4208c4
- Top 10 Aerospace and Defense Companies in the US in 2021 by Revenue – GlobalData, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.globaldata.com/companies/top-companies-by-sector/aerospace-and-defence/us-defense-companies-by-revenue/
- Ranked: America’s Largest Defense Contractors – Visual Capitalist, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.visualcapitalist.com/americas-largest-defense-contractors/
- RTX Market Cap 2010-2025 – Macrotrends, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/RTX/rtx/market-cap
- Market Cap of Boeing Company | Bullfincher, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://bullfincher.io/companies/the-boeing-company/market-cap
- Northrop Grumman Market Cap 2010-2025 | NOC – Macrotrends, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NOC/northrop-grumman/market-cap
- General Dynamics (GD) – Market capitalization – Companies Market Cap, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/general-dynamics/marketcap/
- LMT Relative Valuation – Lockheed Martin Corp – Alpha Spread, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/lmt/relative-valuation/enterprise-value-to-ebitda
- Top 10 US Government Contractors 2024 – ExecutiveBiz, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.executivebiz.com/articles/top-10-government-contractors-2024
- List of defense contractors – Wikipedia, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_defense_contractors
- The Top 10 U.S. Aerospace and Defense Contractors – USFunds, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.usfunds.com/resource/the-top-10-u-s-aerospace-and-defense-contractors/
- Lockheed Martin (LMT) Investor Relations Material – Quartr, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://quartr.com/companies/lockheed-martin-corporation_5330
- Annual Reports and Proxy Statement | Lockheed Martin, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/news/annual-reports.html
- Lockheed Martin Market Cap 2010-2025 | LMT – Macrotrends, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/LMT/lockheed-martin/market-cap
- Northrop Grumman Corporation Company Profile, Statistics and Facts | Bullfincher, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://bullfincher.io/companies/northrop-grumman-corporation/overview
- General Dynamics Market Cap – Stocks – MLQ.ai, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://mlq.ai/stocks/GD/market-cap/
- RTX (RTX) – Revenue – Companies Market Cap, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/raytheon-technologies/revenue/
- General Dynamics (GD) – Revenue – Companies Market Cap, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/general-dynamics/revenue/
- Northrop Grumman Revenue 2010-2025 | NOC – Macrotrends, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NOC/northrop-grumman/revenue
- General Dynamics Revenue 2010-2025 | GD – Macrotrends, accessed on August 15, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/GD/general-dynamics/revenue
