Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
Jeffrey Epstein’s financial standing at the time of his death in August 2019 was a complex and evolving figure, initially estimated to be between $560 million and $577 million.
His wealth was primarily composed of a diverse portfolio including lavish real estate, substantial liquid assets, and various luxury items.
The accumulation of this fortune stemmed largely from his role as a money manager for a concentrated base of ultra-high-net-worth individuals, coupled with aggressive tax strategies.
Following his death, the administration of his estate became a protracted legal and financial undertaking, marked by significant fluctuations in its reported value.
Extensive legal liabilities, including a victim compensation program and multi-party lawsuits against both his estate and associated financial institutions, have dictated the disposition of his assets.
This report examines the initial valuation of his net worth, the composition and sources of his wealth, the dynamic changes in his estate’s value post-death, and the profound impact of legal settlements and administrative challenges on his financial legacy.
2. Initial Valuation at Time of Death (August 2019)
At the time of his death in August 2019, while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, Jeffrey Epstein’s net worth was initially reported with a remarkable degree of consistency across various official filings.
A filing in his criminal case pegged his net worth at approximately $560 million.1
Concurrently, his last will and testament, executed merely two days before his death and subsequently filed for probate in the U.S. Virgin Islands, reported his worth at approximately $577 million.2
This close alignment between the figures presented in criminal proceedings and probate documents suggests a unified or highly consistent initial assessment of his known assets.
This consistency provides a firm baseline for understanding the subsequent fluctuations in the estate’s value and indicates that the immediate financial picture was relatively clear, even if not entirely exhaustive.
The decision to file the will in the U.S. Virgin Islands, where Epstein was listed as a resident, was a deliberate strategic choice.3
Attorneys likely pursued this jurisdiction with the expectation that the probate process would afford greater privacy compared to other, more scrutinized locations.7
Wills typically become public records through probate, but the selection of jurisdiction can significantly influence the visibility and complexity of legal challenges, particularly for high-profile estates.
This move underscores Epstein’s sophisticated approach to financial and legal maneuvering, even in the face of impending criminal charges, suggesting a pre-meditated attempt to control the public narrative and shield details of his financial affairs and potential beneficiaries from widespread scrutiny.
The will named two long-term employees, Darren K.
Indyke and Richard d+. Kahn, as executors of his estate.8
Table 1: Jeffrey Epstein’s Reported Net Worth and Key Assets at Time of Death (August 2019)
| Category | Estimated Value (USD) |
| Total Net Worth | $560 – $577 million |
| Cash Holdings | >$56 million |
| Equities | >$112 million |
| Hedge Funds & Private Equity Investments | >$194 million (approx. $200 million) |
| Vehicles, Aircraft, Boats | >$18.5 million |
| Manhattan Townhouse | >$50 million |
| Palm Beach Mansion | ~$12 million |
| New Mexico Ranch | >$17 million |
| Paris Apartment | ~$8.6 million |
| Caribbean Islands (Great & Little St. James) | ~$86 million |
| Art & Collectibles | To be appraised (initially low) |
3. Composition of Assets
Jeffrey Epstein’s substantial wealth was distributed across a diversified portfolio of assets, reflecting a strategy common among high-net-worth individuals, albeit with unique valuations due to his notoriety.
His real estate holdings were particularly notable and geographically dispersed.
The palatial Manhattan Townhouse on the Upper East Side was initially valued at more than $50 million.1
By 2019, its valuation varied, with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York estimating it at $77 million, while the New York City Department of Finance assessed it at $56 million.11
Ultimately, this property sold for $51 million in March 2021, with the proceeds earmarked for the Victims’ Compensation Program.11
In Florida, Epstein owned a Palm Beach Mansion, valued at approximately $12 million.1
This property, acquired for $2.5 million in 1990, was sold for $19 million in March 2020 and subsequently demolished.13
His
Zorro Ranch in New Mexico was valued at just over $17 million 1, having been purchased for around $12 million in 1993.14
It was listed for $27.5 million before its sale, though the final price remains confidential.15
The
Paris apartment, a 7,373 square foot luxury unit, was valued at an estimated $8.6 million 1 and sold for $10.4 million in June 2023.17
Perhaps the most infamous of his properties were his two private Caribbean islands, Great St. James and Little St. James.
These islands were together valued at $86 million following his death.1
Little St. James was acquired for $7.95 million in 1998, and Great St. James for over $20 million in 2016.1
Despite being listed for $125 million in March 2022 and later reduced to $110 million, they were ultimately purchased for $60 million in May 2023 by billionaire Stephen Deckoff.1
Beyond real estate, Epstein held significant liquid assets and investments.
His cash holdings were reported at $9.4 million at the time of his death, which later decreased to $7.6 million.18
He primarily kept these funds in two Puerto Rico banks, 1 First Bank and Banco Popular.18
His investment portfolio included over $112 million in equities 5, nearly $200 million in hedge funds and private equity investments (specifically, more than $194 million) 5, and over $14 million in fixed-income investments.10
Other valuables included vehicles, aircraft, and boats, collectively valued at $18.5 million 4, which encompassed a private jet.1
Specific sales of these assets included a 2018 Bentley for $195,000 and a 2019 Mercedes Benz for $133,200.18
His art and collectibles were initially noted as assets requiring appraisal.3
However, an accounting statement from 2022 presented a surprisingly low valuation of only $338,804 for his entire collection of “artwork, collectibles and furnishings”.21
This figure stands in stark contrast to the potential value of individual pieces he was known to possess, such as a Kees van Dongen painting that had sold for $5.9 million in 2004.21
The discrepancy raises questions about the thoroughness of the estate’s appraisal or the possibility that more valuable pieces were not included in the reported inventory.
The estate was reportedly paying $15,000 per month just for art storage 21, which further highlights the puzzlingly low overall valuation for the collection, suggesting either a deliberate obfuscation of assets, significant challenges in liquidating “tainted” art at fair market value, or an incomplete comprehensive estate appraisal.
4. Sources of Wealth and Financial Strategies
Jeffrey Epstein’s substantial fortune was not amassed through conventional investment banking or a broad client base, but rather through highly concentrated relationships and sophisticated, often aggressive, financial strategies.
His career trajectory saw him move from a brief teaching stint at the Dalton School to a position at Bear Stearns, eventually establishing himself as a money manager for ultra-high-net-worth individuals.1
A significant portion of his wealth originated from just two billionaire clients.
For over a decade, Epstein served as the personal money manager and business adviser for Les Wexner, the founder and CEO of L Brands, reportedly generating hundreds of millions of dollars from this relationship, which was described as his “first anchor client”.1
Later, Leon Black, Chairman of Apollo Global Management, paid Epstein $158 million for tax and estate planning services, as documented by the Senate Finance Committee.1
Investigations by Forbes suggest that Epstein generated over $800 million in revenue largely from these two individuals alone.22
The sheer volume of payments from such a limited number of clients for services like “tax and estate planning” suggests a highly specialized, and potentially ethically ambiguous, financial strategy rather than diversified, conventional investment management.
This concentration of wealth generation, combined with his exceptionally low tax burden, points to a system where wealth and power facilitated highly favorable, and perhaps illicit, financial arrangements.
Epstein was also adept at leveraging tax strategies to his advantage.
He notably utilized the U.S. Virgin Islands tax program, which allowed him to legally pay an effective tax rate of just 4%, resulting in an estimated $300 million in tax savings.22
This aggressive tax avoidance contributed significantly to his ability to maintain the illusion of immense wealth.
His financial dealings extended to major banking institutions.
JPMorgan Chase facilitated Epstein’s finances from 1998 through August 2013, providing loans and allowing him to withdraw large sums of cash.1
The bank later faced significant legal repercussions, settling a class-action lawsuit for $290 million to resolve claims by dozens of Epstein’s accusers.20
An additional $75 million settlement was reached with the U.S. Virgin Islands.20
Following the termination of his relationship with JPMorgan, Epstein became a client of Deutsche Bank from 2013 to 2018.
Deutsche Bank subsequently agreed to pay $75 million to settle a lawsuit alleging it “knowingly benefited” from his sex trafficking activities.1
These settlements by major financial institutions indicate that Epstein’s financial success was not merely a result of his own actions but was also facilitated by a network of institutional relationships, some of which later faced legal accountability for their role.
5. Evolution of the Estate’s Value Post-Death
Jeffrey Epstein’s estate experienced a dynamic and often volatile trajectory in its valuation following his death, influenced by asset liquidations, significant legal payouts, and a substantial tax refund.
Initially, the estate, reported at $577 million, saw an increase of approximately $57 million, reaching a total of $634.8 million by early 2020.18
This temporary appreciation was primarily driven by the successful sale of some of his luxury assets and the liquidation of various accounts.
For instance, over $1 million was generated from the sale of expensive items, including a 2018 Bentley for $195,000 in November 2019 and a 2019 Mercedes Benz for $133,200 in December 2019.18
Furthermore, the liquidation of five accounts yielded approximately $538,000.18
At the time of his death, Epstein held $9.4 million in cash, which subsequently decreased by $1.8 million to $7.6 million.18
Despite these initial gains, the estate’s value underwent a significant overall reduction due to the overwhelming liabilities and legal settlements it faced.
As of late 2024 or early 2025 reporting, the estate’s value had ballooned to $145 million after receiving a substantial tax refund.24
This current figure represents a dramatic shift from earlier predictions by one of the executors, who had anticipated the estate shrinking to less than $40 million once all payments were made.24
A key factor in this rebound was a $111.6 million tax refund from the IRS in Fall 2024.24
This refund stemmed from an estimated $190 million tax payment made by the estate in July 2020, which was based on assumptions about asset values that were later sold for considerably less.24
Tax experts have indicated that such refunds are not uncommon for wealthy estates, particularly when initial asset valuations are overestimated or debts are underestimated during the early stages of probate.24
The trajectory of the estate’s value—an initial increase followed by a dramatic reduction due to payouts, and then a partial recovery from a large tax refund—illustrates the complex and volatile nature of its financial administration.
While the executors were effective in liquidating some assets early on, the immense financial drain from numerous legal claims and administrative costs far outstripped these gains, leading to a significant net decrease in the estate’s overall value.
The substantial tax refund, while boosting the remaining assets, only partially mitigated the overall depletion.
This progression highlights the significant challenges and financial complexities inherent in winding down an estate embroiled in such extensive litigation, where initial valuations and tax provisions are often speculative and subject to major adjustments as liabilities crystallize.
Table 2: Evolution of Jeffrey Epstein’s Estate Value (2019-Present)
| Date/Period | Estate Value (USD) | Key Changes/Events |
| August 2019 | $560 – $577 million | Initial reported net worth at time of death |
| Early 2020 | $634.8 million | Increased by ~$57M due to asset sales & liquidations |
| Fall 2024 (approx.) | $145 million | After $111.6M tax refund and significant payouts |
6. Legal Liabilities and Settlements
The administration of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate has been dominated by extensive legal challenges and financial settlements, which have profoundly impacted its ultimate distribution.
A central element of his estate planning was the establishment of “The 1953 Trust.”
The 1953 Trust and Estate Planning
Epstein signed his last will and testament on August 8, 2019, just two days before his death, directing all his assets and any remaining estate assets to this newly created trust.3
Named after his birth year, this “pour-over” will structure was likely intended to shield assets and maintain privacy, as trusts generally remain private unlike public wills.4
Legal experts noted that accessing the trust’s details would be challenging for accusers.4
The trust’s contents and the identities of most beneficiaries were not filed with the court and largely remained private.4
However, court filings and depositions later revealed that the co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, were also co-trustees and beneficiaries, alongside Karyna Shuliak, Epstein’s girlfriend, who was a potential beneficiary of $4.65 million in personal property.24
A critical aspect of this trust was its revocable nature, meaning Epstein could have altered its terms during his lifetime.
This characteristic implied that the assets were still considered his for tax and creditor purposes, unlike irrevocable trusts, which offer stronger asset protection.3
While the trust aimed to create a barrier, the fact that the estate still paid out hundreds of millions in settlements demonstrates the limited effectiveness of this strategy against determined legal challenges.
The legal system, through various mechanisms, ultimately prioritized justice for victims and governmental claims over Epstein’s attempts to protect his wealth or conceal its beneficiaries.
Victim Compensation Program (VCP)
In a significant move to address the numerous claims, the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program (Epstein VCP) was established by Epstein’s estate on June 25, 2020.26
This program operated independently from the estate, managed by nationally recognized independent claims administration experts.27
The VCP awarded over $121 million to 135 survivors, providing compensation to resolve their sexual abuse and other sex-related claims.26
Compensation was not capped and was determined on a case-by-case basis, with individual awards ranging from thousands to over a million dollars.26
The program received approximately 225 applications, with about 150 deemed eligible, and a high acceptance rate of 92% among claimants.27
The fund concluded its operations in August 2021.26
The VCP offered a faster alternative for survivors to receive compensation, even considering claims that were time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations.27
Other Legal Claims and Settlements
Beyond the VCP, Epstein’s estate and entities associated with him faced a cascade of other legal claims.
The U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) Attorney General, Denise N.
George, filed a lawsuit against the estate, alleging that Epstein used his private islands for sex trafficking.18
The USVI ultimately reached a settlement of at least $105 million with Epstein’s estate in November 2022.17
This settlement was part of a broader effort by the USVI to confiscate significant assets from the estate.18
Major financial institutions that had dealings with Epstein also faced substantial legal repercussions.
JPMorgan Chase, which had Epstein as a client from 1998 until 2013, settled claims related to his sex trafficking activities.
The bank paid $290 million to resolve claims by dozens of Epstein’s accusers in June 2023.1
Additionally, JPMorgan settled with the USVI for $75 million in September 2023.20
Deutsche Bank, Epstein’s client from 2013 to 2018, agreed to pay $75 million in May 2023 to settle a lawsuit alleging it “knowingly benefited” from his sex trafficking.1
These multi-party settlements by major banks, totaling over $440 million, were distinct legal actions separate from the estate’s direct payouts.
They stemmed from allegations that the banks had deficiencies in oversight or knowingly benefited from Epstein’s illicit activities.1
The willingness of these institutions to settle for such large sums suggests a recognition of institutional complicity or negligence, leading to compensation that bypassed the estate’s probate process and directly addressed affected parties.
This demonstrates a crucial broader implication: the financial repercussions of Epstein’s crimes extended beyond his personal wealth to the institutions that facilitated his activities, setting a precedent for holding financial institutions accountable for their role, however indirect, in illicit enterprises.
Outstanding Debts and Creditor Priority
In the administration of an estate, creditors are typically paid first before any property passes to heirs or beneficiaries.3
Epstein’s will explicitly directed his executors to pay funeral, burial, and administration expenses, as well as “all of my debts duly proven and allowed against my estate”.3
Legal experts indicated that accusers, as a class of potential claimants, would generally rank fourth in priority, following the U.S. government/IRS, secured creditors, and estate administration expenses.10
The estate also repaid a $30 million loan 24, further illustrating the range of financial obligations it had to satisfy.
Table 3: Major Settlements and Payouts from Epstein’s Estate and Related Entities
| Recipient/Claimant Type | Amount (USD) | Source/Context |
| Epstein Estate Payouts | ||
| Victims (VCP) | $121 million | Awarded to 135 survivors through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program (closed Aug 2021) |
| US Virgin Islands (USVI) | $105 million | Settlement with Epstein’s estate for sex trafficking allegations (Nov 2022) |
| Loan Repayment | $30 million | Repaid loan from the estate |
| Bank Settlements (Separate from Estate) | ||
| JPMorgan Chase (Victims) | $290 million | Settlement to resolve claims by dozens of Epstein’s accusers (June 2023) |
| JPMorgan Chase (USVI) | $75 million | Settlement with USVI over sex trafficking (Sept 2023) |
| Deutsche Bank (Victims) | $75 million | Settlement with women alleging the bank benefited from sex trafficking (May 2023) |
7. Challenges in Estate Administration and Asset Distribution
The administration and distribution of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate have been fraught with significant complexities, largely stemming from the sheer volume of legal claims and the notorious nature of his assets.
Attorneys had accurately anticipated a “long legal fight” 3, with the estate expected to remain “in the middle of lawsuits for a long time”.3
The process of untangling his intricate financial affairs was inherently costly and time-consuming.4
This extended litigation period consumed significant resources and delayed the final resolution of the estate.
A notable challenge was the impact of Epstein’s notoriety on the market value of his properties, leading to what has been termed the “Epstein Discount.” His high-value real estate consistently sold for significantly less than their estimated market value or asking prices due to their association with his egregious crimes.
For example, the Manhattan Townhouse, once valued at $88 million, ultimately sold for $51 million.11
Similarly, his Caribbean islands, valued at $86 million after his death and initially listed for $125 million, sold for $60 million.1
The New Mexico Ranch, listed for $27.5 million, also likely experienced this “taint” on its final, confidential sale price.15
This consistent pattern demonstrates a direct causal relationship where the criminal association of the properties deterred buyers or depressed market value, thereby reducing the total proceeds available for the estate.
This phenomenon highlights a unique challenge in estate administration for individuals whose assets are inextricably linked to their criminal notoriety, showing that infamy can have a quantifiable negative impact on asset realization.
The secrecy surrounding the beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust also added layers of complexity.
While designed for privacy, keeping the identities of most beneficiaries shrouded complicated efforts for victims to identify and potentially challenge distributions.4
Despite this, some beneficiaries, such as the co-executors and Karyna Shuliak (Epstein’s girlfriend), were eventually identified through court filings.24
Furthermore, the process of accurately valuing the estate’s assets and anticipating its liabilities proved challenging, as evidenced by the substantial IRS tax refund.
The $111.6 million refund was partly due to an initial overestimation of asset values and an underestimation of debt when the provisional $190 million tax payment was made in 2020.24
This underscores the inherent difficulty in accurately appraising unique properties and anticipating the full scope of liabilities in such a complex and legally contested estate.
With litigation against the estate gradually winding down, the remaining assets, now valued at approximately $145 million, are expected to flow into the 1953 Trust.24
However, the trust document itself has been described by an executor as “poorly drafted” and unclear on how the remainder should be distributed.24
This lack of clarity suggests potential for further disputes regarding the final disposition of Epstein’s remaining fortune.
8. Conclusion
Jeffrey Epstein’s net worth was a dynamic and complex figure, fundamentally shaped by both his illicit activities and the extensive legal and financial fallout that followed his death.
Initially estimated between $560 million and $577 million in August 2019, the estate’s value saw temporary fluctuations, including an initial increase from asset liquidations.
However, the overwhelming liabilities stemming from victim compensation programs and multi-party lawsuits, including those against major financial institutions, ultimately led to a substantial reduction in its overall worth.
The accumulation of Epstein’s wealth was not a product of diversified investment success but rather derived from a concentrated client base and aggressive tax strategies, which points to a financial model that leveraged specific relationships and potentially exploited legal loopholes.
The administration of his estate has been a protracted and challenging endeavor.
While his 1953 Trust was strategically designed to shield assets and maintain privacy, its revocable nature limited its effectiveness against determined legal challenges.
The notorious association of his properties led to a quantifiable “Epstein Discount,” tangibly reducing the proceeds available from asset sales.
The significant IRS tax refund, while boosting the estate’s remaining value, highlights the initial uncertainties and complexities inherent in valuing such a tainted fortune.
Ultimately, a substantial portion of Epstein’s wealth has been directed towards compensating his victims and settling various legal claims, reflecting a concerted effort by legal and governmental bodies to ensure accountability.
The financial legacy of Jeffrey Epstein is not merely a static net worth figure; it stands as a testament to the intricate and often prolonged process of unwinding a fortune built on crime, and the ongoing efforts to seek justice and restitution for those harmed.
Works cited
- How did Jeffrey Epstein make all of his money? – CBS News, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-did-jeffrey-epstein-make-his-money/
- What Happens With Epstein’s Victims and His $577M Fortune?, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.lyonspc.com/news_releases/what-happens-next-with-jeffrey-epsteins-victims-and-his-577m-fortune/
- The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein: How Will it be Settled?, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.estatelawpartners.com/blog/2019/november/the-estate-of-jeffrey-epstein-how-will-it-be-set/
- Jeffrey Epstein signed new will to shield $577m fortune days before death – The Guardian, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/22/jeffrey-epstein-trust-fund-will-damages
- Jeffrey Epstein signed a will just two days before his death – The Guardian, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/19/jeffrey-epstein-signed-will-days-before-death-estate
- Epstein signed a will 2 days before jailhouse suicide | PBS News, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/epstein-signed-a-will-2-days-before-jailhouse-suicide
- Case Update: Jeffrey Epstein’s Estate – The Law Firm Of Myrna Serrano Setty, P.A., accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.serranosetty.com/case-update-jeffrey-epsteins-estate/
- Death of Jeffrey Epstein – Wikipedia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Jeffrey_Epstein
- last will and testament, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=15978988
- Epstein’s will: assets not an easy win for victims | Fox Business, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/epstein-made-things-harder-for-his-alleged-victims-to-obtain-his-assets
- Herbert N. Straus House – Wikipedia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_N._Straus_House
- Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion sells for $51m with victims to receive money – The Guardian, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/mar/12/jeffrey-epstein-manhattan-mansion-sells-restitution-fund
- Notorious Palm Beach Mansion Jeffrey Epstein Bought for $2.5M Transformed Into $60M Estate – Realtor.com, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.realtor.com/news/trends/palm-beach-mansion-jeffrey-epstein-bought-transformed-into-estate/
- Zorro Ranch, New Mexico – Wikipedia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zorro_Ranch,_New_Mexico
- Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Zorro Ranch’ sold in New Mexico – YouTube, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHavjDN2dVI&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD
- Price of infamous Jeffrey Epstein islands slashed – realestate.com.au, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.realestate.com.au/news/price-of-infamous-jeffrey-epstein-islands-slashed/
- Jeffrey Epstein’s Paris apartment bought by plastics tycoon for $10.4M | Fox Business, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.foxbusiness.com/real-estate/jeffrey-epstein-paris-apartment-bought-plastics-tycoon-10-4m
- Jeffrey Epstein estate $57M richer since disgraced financier’s death | Fox Business, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.foxbusiness.com/money/jeffrey-epstein-estate-sale-property
- Little Saint James, U.S. Virgin Islands – Wikipedia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Saint_James,_U.S._Virgin_Islands
- Inside The Selloff Of Jeffrey Epstein’s Tainted Homes And Where The Money Went, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCjmMIwdMhs
- Jeffrey Epstein’s Taste in Art Was Just as Twisted as You’d Think – Artnet News, accessed August 13, 2025, https://news.artnet.com/art-world/jeffrey-epstein-townhouse-sculpture-art-2674772
- Epstein’s Riches: Forbes Reporters Break Down How He Made His Millions – YouTube, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0L6VyKkLmA
- JP Morgan settles Jeffrey Epstein lawsuits with US Virgin Islands for $75m – The Guardian, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/sep/26/jpmorgan-jeffrey-epstein-lawsuit-settlement-us-virgin-islands
- Jeffrey Epstein’s Estate Got a $112 Million Tax Refund – GV Wire, accessed August 13, 2025, https://gvwire.com/2025/01/15/jeffrey-epsteins-estate-got-a-112-million-tax-refund/
- Epstein’s Will Won’t Change Much – Palisades Hudson Financial Group, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.palisadeshudson.com/2019/08/epsteins-will-wont-change-much/
- Jeffrey Epstein Estate Opens Fund To Compensate Sex Abuse Victims, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.abuselawsuit.com/news/epstein-estate-opens-fund-to-compensate-sex-abuse-victims/
- The History of the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program – Edwards Henderson, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.crimevictimlawfirm.com/epstein-victims-compensation-program/
