A Forensic Analysis of the Financial Collapse of Brandon Miller and Real Estate Equities Corporation

Introduction

This report provides a forensic financial analysis of Brandon Miller (1981-2024), the New York City-based real estate developer whose tragic death by suicide on July 3, 2024, unveiled a staggering financial collapse hidden behind a facade of immense wealth.¹

The subject of this analysis is definitively identified as the managing partner of Real Estate Equities Corporation (REEC) and husband to socialite and influencer Candice Miller, whose lifestyle blog “Mama & Tata” chronicled a life of Hamptons society events, luxury travel, and opulent living.³

This focus distinguishes him from other professionals named Brandon Miller active in different sectors of real estate or finance.⁶

The central thesis of this investigation is the profound and ultimately fatal chasm between the Millers’ public-facing persona and their private financial reality.

To the outside world, amplified through the lens of social media, they were the epitome of millennial success—a glamorous couple with two daughters, a $9 million Tribeca apartment, and a sprawling $15.5 million estate in Water Mill, NY.¹

However, at the time of his death, Brandon Miller was not a millionaire.

He was catastrophically insolvent, crushed by personal and business debts that dwarfed his assets by tens of millions of dollars.

This report will conduct a financial post-mortem, deconstructing Miller’s balance sheet to provide a definitive answer to inquiries regarding his net worth.

By meticulously examining his liabilities, analyzing his personal and corporate assets, and untangling the web of litigation that defined his final years, this analysis will demonstrate not only the deeply negative value of his estate but also the mechanisms of its ruin.

It is a case study in extreme leverage, speculative risk, and the corrosive pressure of maintaining an illusion of wealth in the digital age.

Section 1: The Final Balance Sheet: A Deeply Negative Net Worth

At the moment of his death, Brandon Miller’s financial position was the inverse of his public image.

A consolidation of court filings submitted by his widow and subsequent investigative reports from financial and news media reveals a state of acute insolvency.⁴

His liquid assets were virtually non-existent, and his primary physical asset—the Hamptons estate—was so heavily leveraged that it provided negligible net equity.

When set against a mountain of secured, unsecured, and consumer debt, the resulting net worth is profoundly negative.

The most startling figure to emerge from the financial wreckage was the state of his cash reserves.

At the time of his death, Brandon Miller had just $8,000 in his bank account.⁴

This sum stands in stark contrast to the ~$34 million in personal liabilities he had accumulated.¹

This debt figure does not include a number of additional business-related loans taken out under the auspices of his company, Real Estate Equities Corp., further deepening the financial abyss.¹¹

The calculation of his net worth is therefore unambiguous.

While a gross accounting of assets might include the market value of his real estate, a true net worth calculation must subtract the corresponding liabilities.

Given that the debts attached to his main asset nearly equaled its sale price, and his unsecured debts totaled over $20 million, his net worth was not merely zero but was negative by tens of millions of dollars.

The commonly cited figure of being ~$34 million in debt with only $8,000 in cash effectively treats his encumbered assets as having zero or negative equity, leading to a final net worth in the range of negative $34 million.

The following table provides a summarized, top-level view of Brandon Miller’s estimated personal financial position, illustrating the scale of the disparity between his assets and liabilities.

Table 1: Estimated Personal Net Worth of Brandon Miller (at time of death, July 2024)

Category	Item	Estimated Value (USD)	Source(s)
Assets
	Cash & Equivalents	$8,000	4
	Real Estate (Hamptons Property at Listing)	$15,500,000	10
	Note: This asset was heavily encumbered and later sold for $12.8M.		16
	Total Gross Assets	~$15,508,000
Liabilities
	Secured Debt (Hamptons Mortgages)	~$12,000,000	12
	Unsecured Bank Loan (BMO Bank)	$11,300,000	1
	Unsecured Private Loan (Donald Jaffe)	$6,100,000	1
	Unsecured Bank Loan (UBS Bank)	$2,100,000	12
	Credit Card Debt (American Express)	$300,000	1
	Cash Advance Loan (Funding Club)	$266,000	1
	Other Unsecured Loans & Obligations	~$2,000,000+	12
	Total Estimated Liabilities	~$34,066,000
Net Worth
	Estimated Net Worth	~($18,558,000)

Section 2: Deconstruction of Liabilities: Anatomy of a ~$34 Million Debt

The composition of Brandon Miller’s approximately $34 million in personal debt reveals a clear and desperate progression of financial distress.

The borrowing pattern began with conventional real estate financing and escalated systematically toward high-risk, high-cost capital.

This trajectory indicates that as his primary assets became fully leveraged, his access to traditional credit lines was exhausted, compelling him to seek out lenders of last resort at punitive terms.

This evolution from standard mortgages to massive unsecured loans and, finally, to cash advances paints a vivid picture of a borrower trapped in a deepening liquidity crisis.

2.1 The Hamptons Epicenter: Secured Debt and Leveraged Assets

The family’s sprawling estate at 25 Cobb Isle Road in Water Mill, NY, was the epicenter of both their public image and their private debt.⁴

Purchased for $3.2 million in 2011, the property was extensively developed and showcased as a symbol of their success.¹

In reality, it served as the primary collateral for an ever-increasing pile of debt.

By the time of Miller’s death, the home was encumbered by at least four, and by some reports five, separate mortgages totaling nearly $12 million.¹

This practice of “loan stacking”—layering multiple liens on a single property—dramatically increases the risk for lenders and is a hallmark of a borrower stretching their collateral to its absolute limit.

The key lenders secured by this property included:

• Titan Capital: A bridge lender specializing in short-term, asset-backed loans. Titan held at least two loans against the Hamptons home: a $2 million mortgage and a separate $800,000 loan.¹ The nature of a bridge lender suggests Miller needed fast access to capital that traditional banks were unwilling to provide. True to form, upon Miller’s death, Titan Capital moved swiftly, filing a lawsuit against his widow, Candice Miller, for missed payments, highlighting the immediate default status of the estate.¹⁰
• UBS and Stevens Financial Group: These financial institutions also held outstanding loans against the property, contributing to the consolidated mortgage debt of nearly $12 million.¹

2.2 The Unsecured Abyss: High-Risk Capital and Personal Guarantees

The largest and most telling portion of Miller’s liabilities consisted of unsecured loans.

These debts were not backed by specific physical collateral but by Miller’s personal guarantee and the lender’s faith in the future profitability of his business ventures.

The sheer size of these loans underscores the magnitude of the risks he was taking and the immense pressure he was under to make his speculative real estate projects succeed.

• BMO Bank: Miller’s single largest liability was an $11.3 million unsecured loan from the Chicago-based bank.¹ For a bank to extend an unsecured credit facility of this magnitude to an individual real estate developer is highly unusual and suggests the loan was predicated on an extremely optimistic projection of REEC’s future earnings—a projection that ultimately failed to materialize.
• Donald Jaffe: A $6.1 million loan from this private financier, who had also been a lender to Miller’s father, represented another massive, long-standing liability.¹ This debt was particularly contentious, having already resulted in a lawsuit filed by Jaffe against Miller in 2019 for non-payment, indicating that this financial strain was not a recent development but a chronic issue.⁴

2.3 Consumer and Short-Term Obligations

The final layer of debt reveals the severity of the cash-flow crisis, where even routine personal and business expenses could no longer be met through normal income.

This forced Miller to turn to the most expensive forms of credit available.

• American Express: An outstanding balance of over $300,000 demonstrated that even revolving credit lines were maxed out.¹
• Funding Club: A debt of $266,000 to this Brooklyn-based company, identified as a cash advance lender, is particularly revealing.¹ Cash advance loans are typically very high-interest, short-term instruments used by businesses or individuals in dire need of immediate liquidity, often when all other credit options have been exhausted.
• Unpaid Rent: The family’s financial collapse had a direct impact on their living situation. After selling their $9 million Tribeca apartment, they moved into a luxury rental on the Upper East Side with a monthly rent of $47,000, which later increased to $49,000.¹ Their landlord, Mak Acquisitions, filed a lawsuit against Candice Miller for
  $194,881 in unpaid rent for the months of April through July 2024.¹ This default on a primary living expense shows that the financial structure had completely broken down.

Section 3: Analysis of Assets: Illusion, Reality, and Corporate Distress

An examination of Brandon Miller’s assets reveals that his wealth was largely an illusion, constructed upon a foundation of fatally over-leveraged personal property and a portfolio of speculative, debt-ridden corporate projects.

The engine of his financial life, Real Estate Equities Corporation (REEC), was not a source of stable profit but a vortex of cash-consuming developments that were failing systemically.

The collapse of his corporate ambitions was the direct cause of his personal financial ruin.

3.1 Personal Property: The Hamptons Mansion and Other Holdings

The tangible assets associated with the Miller name were symbols of wealth that masked their true, debt-encumbered nature.

• Water Mill, NY Estate: The 8,674-square-foot mansion at 25 Cobb Isle Road was the crown jewel of the Millers’ social media presence.¹ Purchased for $3.2 million in 2011 and subsequently developed, it was listed for sale at $15.5 million shortly after his death.¹⁰ This valuation, however, was superficial. The property was a debt trap, collateralizing nearly $12 million in mortgages.¹² It ultimately sold in a distressed transaction for
  $12.8 million, a price reportedly pushed through by a lender who “wanted out”.¹⁶ After accounting for the mortgages and transaction costs, the net equity realized from this signature asset was minimal at best.
• Tribeca Apartment: In 2021, the family sold their apartment at 137 Franklin Street for $9 million.¹ This should have been a significant liquidity event that could have been used to deleverage and stabilize their finances. Instead, the proceeds appear to have been entirely consumed by the failing business and the maintenance of their high-cost lifestyle. The evidence for this is their subsequent move into an expensive rental and the continued, rapid accumulation of new, more desperate forms of debt.¹

3.2 Real Estate Equities Corporation (REEC): A Legacy in Collapse

The family business was the ultimate source of Brandon Miller’s financial downfall.

What was presented as a thriving development firm was, in fact, a collection of high-risk, speculative projects financed by massive loans that the underlying assets could not support.

3.2.1 Corporate History and Profile

REEC was founded in 1978 by Brandon’s father, Michael Miller, a shopping mall developer.⁵

Brandon joined the firm in 2004 after graduating from Brown University and eventually took the helm as managing partner.⁵

The company’s website and marketing materials boasted an impressive track record, claiming to have developed over 20 million square feet of real estate nationwide with a portfolio valued in excess of $250 million.⁵

However, a more objective, third-party analysis from early 2023 by the real estate data firm PincusCo painted a far more leveraged and precarious picture.

It estimated REEC’s New York City portfolio consisted of just 10 properties with a market value of around $281 million, but saddled with an enormous $178.5 million in debt.²⁶

This high leverage ratio exposed the company to significant risk if its development projects failed to deliver on their projected returns.

3.2.2 A Portfolio Under Water: Analysis of Key REEC Projects

A project-by-project review of REEC’s major New York City developments reveals a pattern of defaults, foreclosures, bankruptcies, and stalled construction.

These were not stable, income-producing assets; they were capital-intensive ventures that were hemorrhaging cash.

• St. Mark’s Place & 3rd Avenue: In a highly ambitious move, REEC acquired the 99-year leasehold for this prominent East Village corner in 2017 to develop a large office building.²² The project was fraught with problems. It faced a pre-foreclosure action from lender Madison Capital Realty in 2021 and suffered extensive delays. Most critically, as the building neared completion, it was described as being built “entirely on spec,” meaning REEC had not secured a single tenant for its office or retail space in a post-pandemic Manhattan market flooded with vacant offices. The firm had reportedly fallen behind on its loan payments to the primary construction lender, Parkview Financial.²²
• Chelsea/High Line (118 10th Avenue): This project ended in unambiguous failure. An entity controlled by Miller, Highline 118 LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in July 2024, just days after his death.²⁸ Miller had reacquired the stalled project from a partnership for a nominal $1 in late 2023, a move that appears to have been a complex and desperate attempt to restructure its finances, as the equity was immediately pledged to another lender.²⁹
• Harlem (313 West 125th Street): This asset was lost entirely. In January 2023, the property was taken by the lender, East West Bank, in a $14.6 million foreclosure.²⁷ Court records from 2021 show that REEC and its partner had already informed the bank that the owners were “unwilling… to put more money into the property,” a clear admission of the project’s failure and a sign of the deep financial trouble that was already well underway.²⁷
• Nolita (156-166 Bowery): REEC entered into a $50 million ground lease for this assemblage in 2020, securing a $60.5 million loan for a mixed-use development.²² This project also collapsed. The property owner, Kinsmen, ultimately terminated the ground lease and sued REEC, alleging multiple defaults.²²

The consistent failure across REEC’s portfolio demonstrates a systemic breakdown of its business model.

The following table summarizes the distressed state of these key projects, providing concrete evidence of the corporate collapse.

Table 2: Status of Key REEC Development Projects (as of Q1 2025)

Project Location	Project Type	Key Financiers/Partners	Status/Outcome	Source(s)
St. Mark’s Place & 3rd Ave	Office Development	Parkview Financial, Madison Capital Realty	Stalled construction, loan defaults, pre-foreclosure action, built “entirely on spec” with no tenants.	22
Chelsea (118 10th Ave)	Office Development	DIA Family Holdings, GDS Development, Klovern	Chapter 11 Bankruptcy filed July 2024. Property later sold to Toll Brothers post-mortem.	28
Harlem (313 W 125th St)	Commercial	East West Bank, Mavik Capital Management	Lost in a $14.6 million foreclosure in January 2023.	27
Nolita (156-166 Bowery)	Mixed-Use Development	Raven Capital Management, Kinsmen Property Group	Ground lease terminated by owner due to multiple defaults by REEC.	22
East Harlem (2226 3rd Ave)	Mixed-Use	Related Companies, Nightingale Properties	Secured a $40 million construction loan amid a complex sale transaction.	26

Section 4: The Web of Litigation: Accelerants of Financial Failure

The numerous lawsuits filed against Brandon Miller, his companies, and ultimately his estate were not merely symptoms of his financial problems; they were active accelerants that intensified the pressure and hastened his collapse.

These legal battles drained capital, damaged his reputation with lenders, and exposed a history of contentious business practices.

The litigation, particularly the lawsuit brought by financier Donald Jaffe, provides a crucial window into a pattern of high-risk behavior and disputed liability that may have begun years earlier.

4.1 The Donald Jaffe Lawsuit: A Case of Alleged Forgery and Disputed Liability

The most revealing legal battle was the 2019 lawsuit filed by Donald Jaffe over a $6.1 million unpaid loan.⁴

This case is pivotal because it alleges a history of familial financial misconduct.

Miller’s primary defense was an explosive one: he claimed he was not responsible for the debt because his signature on the original loan documents had been forged by an assistant at the direction of his own father, Michael Miller.¹⁹

The assistant, Christine Frangipane, also allegedly notarized the forged documents.¹⁹

This defense, however, was ultimately rejected by the court.

The judge ruled that Jaffe, as the lender, was entitled to rely on “facially valid” notarized documents and had no obligation to conduct due diligence to protect Brandon from potential forgery by his own family and staff.¹⁹

The court’s decision was further bolstered by two key facts: Brandon Miller had continued to employ the assistant he accused of forgery, and he had made partial payments on the disputed loan and even negotiated a lower interest rate after his father’s death.¹⁹

These actions were interpreted as an acknowledgment of the debt, fatally undermining his claim of ignorance.

This case is significant for what it suggests about the business culture Miller inherited and perpetuated.

It points to a history of operating in the opaque world of private, off-market financing, governed by personal relationships and, allegedly, a casual approach to legal formalities.

This background provides essential context for his later, even larger, forays into high-risk, unsecured borrowing.

4.2 Creditor Actions and Posthumous Claims

As REEC’s speculative projects faltered and cash flow dried up, the legal challenges mounted, extending to the most basic financial obligations.

The lawsuits filed against his widow immediately after his death illustrate how quickly the entire financial structure disintegrated.

• Titan Capital: The bridge lender sued Candice Miller for missed payments on the mortgages secured by the Hamptons home, demonstrating that the estate was in immediate default on its primary secured debts.¹⁰
• Mak Acquisitions: The landlord of their Upper East Side apartment sued Candice Miller for $194,881 in unpaid rent.¹ This action shows that by the spring of 2024, the Millers were unable to meet even their fundamental household expenses. Candice Miller’s defense was that she had not personally signed the lease agreement.¹²

4.3 Corporate Insolvency Proceedings

The legal troubles at the corporate level were the root cause of the personal financial crisis.

The failure of REEC’s projects manifested in a series of formal insolvency actions that signaled the end of the company as a viable enterprise.

• The Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing for the Highline 118 LLC entity, which held the Chelsea development site, was the most prominent corporate legal failure, occurring just over a week after Miller’s death.²⁸
• This was preceded by the $14.6 million foreclosure on the Harlem property in 2023 ²⁷ and the
  pre-foreclosure action initiated by a lender against the troubled St. Mark’s Place development in 2021.²² Together, these legal events represent the complete and systemic collapse of REEC’s development pipeline.

Section 5: The Aftermath: Unwinding a Devastated Estate

The events following Brandon Miller’s death laid bare the stark reality of his financial situation.

The process of unwinding his estate was not about distributing wealth but about managing a catastrophic insolvency, liquidating assets for far less than their perceived value, and using a life insurance payout as a partial bailout for a fraction of his many creditors.

5.1 Liquidation and Insurance

The liquidation of Miller’s primary personal asset confirmed its limited net value, while a life insurance policy became the estate’s most significant source of liquid funds.

• Sale of the Hamptons Home: The Water Mill mansion, once listed for $15.5 million, was sold in a distressed sale in December 2024 for $12.8 million.¹⁶ With nearly $12 million in mortgages attached to it, the net proceeds after closing costs and fees would have been minimal, offering little relief to the estate’s massive unsecured debt burden. The new owner purchased the home fully furnished and promptly arranged for an auction of its contents, a move Candice Miller stated she was not involved with.¹⁶
• Life Insurance Payout: A critical element in the aftermath was the existence of life insurance policies totaling approximately $15 million, which were reportedly mentioned in the suicide note Miller left behind.³ This payout became the single largest asset of the estate. However, it was not a windfall for his family. Instead, it was immediately targeted by creditors. Reports indicate that Candice Miller agreed to use a portion of these funds to pay around
  $4 million to settle one unpaid loan lawsuit.¹² This demonstrates that the insurance served as a recovery mechanism for some lenders, with the remainder of the funds likely allocated to legal fees and settling other high-priority claims.

5.2 The Dissolution of the REEC Portfolio

Creditors and partners moved swiftly to seize control of and liquidate REEC’s distressed assets in the wake of Miller’s death.

The portfolio was quickly dismantled.

• The bankrupt Chelsea development site at 118 10th Avenue was placed under contract to be sold to a major developer, Toll Brothers, for $53 million, with the proceeds designated to satisfy the claims against that specific project’s bankrupt entity.³¹
• The loan on another of REEC’s last major projects, a life sciences building in Harlem, was sold by the lender, Related, to Raven Capital, effectively transferring control of the debt and the underlying asset to a new party.³¹ This rapid unwinding of the corporate portfolio marked the definitive end of Real Estate Equities Corporation as an active developer under Miller’s vision.

5.3 The Financial Position of the Heir

Candice Miller was left to navigate the immense financial and legal fallout.

Despite the life insurance payout, she remained responsible for managing her late husband’s financial chaos, which included over $20 million in unresolved debts after accounting for the sale of the Hamptons home and the partial settlements.¹²

In a stark departure from her former life, she shut down her “Mama & Tata” blog, deleted her social media, and relocated with her two daughters from New York to Miami.¹

Her new living situation underscores her reliance on her social network for support.

She reportedly resides in a

$10 million Miami Beach condominium that is on loan to her from friends, the family of designer Diane von Furstenberg.¹

This arrangement, while providing stability for her children, highlights the complete evaporation of the family’s own financial resources.

Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale in High-Stakes Real Estate and Finance

The forensic analysis of Brandon Miller’s financial affairs leads to an unequivocal conclusion: at the time of his death, his net worth was not merely zero but was profoundly negative, with liabilities exceeding assets by an estimated $34 million.

The image of the successful real estate mogul, meticulously curated for public consumption, was a mirage funded by a precarious and ultimately unsustainable mountain of debt.

His financial collapse was not the result of a single market downturn or one failed project, but rather a systemic failure rooted in a fatal combination of strategic missteps and immense personal pressure.

The key drivers of this collapse can be summarized as follows:

1. Extreme Leverage: Miller’s strategy relied on using massive amounts of debt to finance speculative, long-term development projects. When these projects stalled or failed, the debt service became impossible to manage.
2. Asset-Liability Mismatch: He funded a high-cost, cash-intensive lifestyle and serviced immediate debt payments with the promise of uncertain, future-dated profits from his speculative real estate ventures. This created a severe liquidity crisis when project timelines were delayed and returns failed to materialize.
3. Fatal Market Miscalculation: REEC’s heavy investment in speculative Manhattan office and commercial developments was predicated on a robust post-pandemic recovery that did not occur at the scale or speed required. The firm was left with nearly completed, tenant-less buildings in a market with record-high vacancy rates.
4. The Perception-Reality Gap: This case serves as a quintessential 21st-century cautionary tale. The pressure to maintain a public-facing image of extravagant success, amplified daily on social media, likely created a feedback loop. This persona may have been necessary to attract investors and lenders, but maintaining it required a level of spending that forced him into ever-riskier cycles of borrowing, digging a deeper financial hole from which escape became impossible.

Ultimately, the story of Brandon Miller is a stark illustration of the dangers of extreme leverage, the fragility of wealth built on debt, and the profound, often tragic, disconnect between social media perception and financial reality.

Works cited

1. Socialite Candice Miller Shares Glimpse Into Miami Life After Husband’s Suicide, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.realtor.com/news/trends/candice-miller-brandon-suicide-miami-home/
2. Details Revealed of Real Estate Mogul Brandon Miller’s Sudden Death as His Wife Speaks Out: ‘Devastated’ – People.com, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://people.com/cause-of-death-revealed-for-brandon-miller-mama-and-tata-husband-8692873
3. What happened to Candice Miller? The ‘Mama & Tata’ Hamptons influencer | FOX 5 New York, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.fox5ny.com/news/candice-brandon-miller-hamptons-suicide-mama-tata
4. US millionaire Brandon Miller dies $34 million in debt, with only $8K in bank, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/new-updates/us-millionaire-brandon-miller-dies-34-million-in-debt-with-only-8k-in-bank/articleshow/112951149.cms
5. Who was Brandon Miller? How was real estate mogul related to Candice Miller of Mama + Tata? Details here – The Economic Times, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/who-was-brandon-miller-how-was-real-estate-mogul-related-to-candice-miller-of-mama-tata-details-here/articleshow/111611957.cms
6. Brandon Miller | LoopNet, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.loopnet.ca/commercial-real-estate-brokers/profile/brandon-miller/5jy2b3mb
7. Forbes Best-In-State Next-Gen Wealth Advisors 2025 List, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/lists/best-in-state-next-gen-advisors/
8. Brandon Miller | Newmark, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.nmrk.com/people/brandon-miller-houston
9. Brandon Miller | LoopNet, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.loopnet.com/commercial-real-estate-brokers/profile/brandon-miller/5jy2b3mb
10. Influencer Candice Miller Lists $15M Hamptons Estate Where Financier Husband Brandon Took His Own Life – MySA, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.mysanantonio.com/realestate/article/influencer-candice-miller-lists-15m-hamptons-19656348.php
11. Late Real Estate Mogul Brandon Miller Died With Just $8000 in the Bank—and $34 Million in Debt – Realtor.com, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.realtor.com/news/real-estate-news/brandon-miller-death-debt-fortune/
12. Mama & Tata Influencer Candice Miller Saddled with Husband’s $33.6 Million Debt After His Death by Suicide: Report – People.com, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://people.com/candice-miller-stuck-with-husband-brandon-33-million-dollar-debt-after-death-by-suicide-report-8767238
13. US Millionaire, Who Died By Suicide, Owed $34 Million With $8000 In Bank – NDTV, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/this-new-york-based-real-estate-mogul-died-with-34-million-in-debt-had-just-8-000-in-bank-6458440
14. Socialite Candice Miller Sued for $195K in Unpaid Rent on New York Apartment 2 Months After Husband Brandon’s Suicide – Realtor.com, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.realtor.com/news/trends/brandon-miller-candice-sued-unpaid-rent/
15. Brandon Miller: From Real Estate Millionaire to $34 Million Debt, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.noradarealestate.com/blog/real-estate-millionaire-who-lost-it-all-with-a-debt-of-34-million/
16. Candice Miller Sells Debt-Ridden Hamptons Mansion for $12.8 Million – Realtor.com, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.realtor.com/news/trends/candice-miller-brandon-hamptons-house-sold/
17. Influencer Candice Miller struggles with $33.6M debt after husband, real estate mogul, takes his own life – The Economic Times, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/influencer-candice-miller-struggles-with-33-6m-debt-after-husband-real-estate-mogul-takes-his-own-life/articleshow/116732306.cms
18. US real estate mogul Brandon Miller, who died by suicide, owed $34mn in debt with just … – Hindustan Times, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/us-real-estate-mogul-brandon-miller-who-died-by-suicide-owed-34mn-in-debt-with-just-8-000-in-his-bank-101725107070943.html
19. Donald Jaffe, Inc. v REEC 137 Franklin St. LLC :: 2022 :: New York …, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/other-courts/2022/2022-ny-slip-op-30301-u.html
20. www.realtor.com, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.realtor.com/news/trends/candice-miller-brandon-hamptons-house-sold/#:~:text=Influencer%20Candice%20Miller%20has%20reportedly,the%20asking%20price%20of%20%2415%2C495%2C000.
21. Candice & Brandon Miller Tribeca apartment : r/NYCinfluencersnark – Reddit, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NYCinfluencersnark/comments/1e1o5gp/candice_brandon_miller_tribeca_apartment/
22. Death of developer sheds light on status of new office building on St. Mark’s Place and 3rd Avenue; ‘The project is entirely on spec’ – EV Grieve, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://evgrieve.com/2024/07/death-of-developer-sheds-light-on.html
23. Brandon Miller, Real Estate Mogul and Husband of Mama & Tata Influencer Candice Miller, Dead at 43: Reports – People.com, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://people.com/brandon-miller-real-estate-mogul-husband-mama-and-tata-influencer-dead-8675023
24. Real Estate Equities, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://reequities.com/
25. Contact – 196 Orchard, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://196orchard.com/contact/
26. Real Estate Equities Corporation – PincusCo, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.pincusco.com/company/real-estate-equities-corporation/
27. REEC was partner with Mavik on Harlem properties lost in $14.6M foreclosure, Mark Tress is buyer – PincusCo, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.pincusco.com/reec-was-partner-with-mavik-on-harlem-properties-lost-in-14-6m-foreclosure-mark-tress-is-buyer/
28. Highline 118 LLC – crezly.com, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.crezly.com/real-estate-news/highline-118-llc/
29. Bankruptcy filed for Chelsea dev site affiliated with late developer Brandon Miller – PincusCo, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.pincusco.com/bankruptcy-filed-for-chelsea-dev-site-affiliated-with-late-developer-brandon-miller/
30. Mark Seigel – PincusCo, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.pincusco.com/person/mark-seigel/
31. Real Estate Equities Corporation – The Real Deal, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://therealdeal.com/company/real-estate-equities-corporation/
32. Lender Entitled to Rely on “Facially Valid” Notarization – Silber Law Firm, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.thesilberlawfirm.com/lender-entitled-to-rely-on-facially-valid-notarization/
33. Hundreds of Items Auctioned Off from Former Home of Mama & Tata Influencer Candice Miler After Late Husband’s Death – People.com, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://people.com/items-auctioned-from-former-home-of-influencer-candice-miler-8769243