Table of Contents
For years, a single, nagging question plagued my work as a financial and cultural analyst: what does a celebrity’s net worth figure actually mean? I’d see the numbers splashed across headlines—$50 million here, $100 million there—and they always felt hollow.
These figures, presented as definitive scores, are often just “gross estimates”.1
They are an “imperfect science,” a blend of public records, known salaries, and a healthy dose of “guesstimation”.2
They tell you a number, but they don’t tell you the story.
They don’t capture the strategy, the trade-offs, the risks mitigated, or the sheer resilience required to build and protect wealth in one of the world’s most volatile industries.
This disconnect was my professional pain point; it felt like reporting the final score of a championship game without ever describing how a single point was scored.
My breakthrough, the epiphany that would reshape my entire approach to analyzing creative careers, arrived from an unexpected source: a deep-dive analysis of Anna Paquin.
On the surface, the number seemed straightforward: as of 2024, Anna Paquin’s net worth is estimated at $14 million.3
But the more I dug, the more that simple figure felt profoundly insufficient.
Here was an actress who defied the odds at every turn.
She won an Academy Award at age 11, a feat that makes her the second-youngest winner in Oscar history.4
She seamlessly transitioned from that prodigious childhood into a core role in a generation-defining superhero franchise,
X-Men.4
She then headlined
True Blood, a seven-season HBO cultural phenomenon that made her a global television star.3
An Oscar, a Marvel franchise, a hit HBO series.
By any conventional measure, this is a career trifecta.
Yet, her net worth, while substantial, wasn’t in the nine-figure stratosphere of some of her blockbuster peers.6
And that’s when it hit me.
This wasn’t a story of falling short.
This was a story of a different strategy altogether.
I wasn’t looking at a simple balance sheet of assets and liabilities; I was looking at a brilliantly constructed, actively managed, and deeply resilient investment portfolio.
The Paquin case forced me to throw out the old, flat model of celebrity wealth and build a new one—a framework that could finally tell the whole story.
The Paradigm Shift: Deconstructing Net Worth from a Balance Sheet to a Portfolio
To truly understand the architecture of a career like Anna Paquin’s, we must stop thinking in terms of a static net worth figure and start thinking like a portfolio manager.
A career in Hollywood isn’t a savings account where paychecks accumulate; it’s a dynamic portfolio of diverse assets, each with a different risk profile, yield, and strategic purpose.
This “Portfolio Model” allows us to analyze career decisions not as isolated events, but as calculated allocations of capital—time, talent, and money—designed to generate different kinds of returns over a long-term horizon.
This framework moves the conversation from the simplistic “How much is she worth?” to the far more insightful “How has she strategically built, diversified, and protected her value over three decades?” It accounts for the fact that net worth is a dynamic number, constantly shifting with market conditions, asset performance, and liabilities.9
The Paquin Portfolio can be broken down into five core asset classes:
- The Anchor Asset: This is the portfolio’s bedrock—a low-risk, high-yield investment that generates consistent, substantial cash flow over a long period, much like an annuity. It provides the financial stability necessary to fund the rest of the portfolio’s strategy.
- Blue-Chip Holdings: These are foundational, high-capitalization assets acquired early on. They are the equivalent of blue-chip stocks—investments in globally recognized, commercially successful ventures that provide significant capital and build immense brand equity.
- The Venture Capital Wing: This is the high-risk, high-reward arm of the portfolio. It involves investing in projects—like independent films or producing ventures—that may offer lower initial financial returns but have the potential for massive long-term payoff in artistic credibility, industry influence, and creative control.
- Tangible Assets: These are the physical, non-liquid holdings that represent a significant store of value, most notably real estate. Their performance provides a real-world case study in value creation, market volatility, and the difference between paper wealth and cash.
- The Intangible Moat: This refers to the non-financial strategies and brand attributes that protect the entire portfolio. It is the active risk management—reputation, professionalism, brand integrity—that defends against the market shocks and reputational crises that can wipe out value overnight.
By examining Anna Paquin’s career through this lens, her $14 million net worth is no longer just a number.
It becomes the logical outcome of a masterclass in building durable, resilient, and self-directed Hollywood wealth.
The Anchor Asset: The ‘True Blood’ Annuity
Every sound investment portfolio needs an anchor, an asset that provides stability and predictable cash flow, insulating the owner from market volatility.
For Anna Paquin, that anchor was unequivocally her starring role as Sookie Stackhouse in the HBO vampire drama True Blood.
Running for seven seasons from 2008 to 2014, this was not merely a job; it was a financial and cultural annuity that became the engine of her entire portfolio.3
The core of this asset was its powerful financial yield.
For her work on the series, Paquin reportedly earned a salary of $275,000 per episode.10
Over the course of the show’s 80-episode run 4, this single role generated a pre-tax income stream of approximately
$22 million from salary alone.
This consistent, multi-million-dollar annual income for the better part of a decade provided a level of financial security that few actors ever achieve.
It was this cash-flow engine that significantly boosted her net worth and solidified her position as a leading, and highly compensated, actress in television.3
But the returns from this anchor asset went far beyond the direct deposits.
The role yielded immense intangible capital.
Her performance, which deftly balanced strength and vulnerability, earned her a Golden Globe Award for Best Actress in a Drama Series in 2009 and numerous other nominations, cementing her critical acclaim.3
The show itself was a cultural juggernaut, a critical and commercial success that kept her at the forefront of the global entertainment conversation for seven years.3
This sustained relevance is a form of brand equity—a valuable asset that paid dividends by making her a bankable and sought-after talent for years to come.
Perhaps the most crucial function of the True Blood annuity, however, was its role as an enabler of strategic risk.
The immense financial stability it provided fundamentally altered the calculus of her career choices.
With a guaranteed, high-level income stream, the pressure to take on roles purely for the paycheck was drastically reduced.
This is a luxury few performers have.
It freed her to allocate her most valuable asset—her time—to projects that built a different, and arguably more durable, kind of equity: artistic credibility and creative control.
In essence, the financial capital generated by her anchor asset directly funded her ability to invest in her “Venture Capital” wing.
This is perfectly captured by an observation from a Reddit user familiar with her career, who noted that she “cashed in with True Blood…
and now she has the freedom to work when she wants to on the projects she wants to”.13
That freedom is the ultimate return on investment from an anchor asset, allowing an artist to transition from being an actress-for-hire to a creative force shaping her own destiny.
Blue-Chip Holdings: The ‘X-Men’ Franchise Foundation
If True Blood was the long-term annuity, the X-Men franchise was Paquin’s blue-chip stock.
Acquired early in her adult career, her role as the iconic mutant Rogue was a foundational investment in a high-capitalization, globally recognized asset.
Unlike the steady, multi-year payout of a TV series, this was an investment that provided a massive injection of brand equity and significant capital, forming the bedrock upon which much of her later portfolio was built.
Paquin first appeared as Rogue in X-Men in 2000, reprising the role in X2 (2003), X-Men: The Last Stand (2006), and returning for a cameo in X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014).4
While her specific salary for each film is not public, the financial context of the franchise speaks volumes.
This was not a small independent project; it was a commercially dominant, multi-billion-dollar enterprise.14
Her co-star Hugh Jackman, the franchise’s centerpiece, is estimated to have earned around $100 million in total for his portrayal of Wolverine.7
The venerable Patrick Stewart saw his salary for playing Professor X climb to a reported $14 million for a single film,
Star Trek: Nemesis, demonstrating the kind of paydays available to key players in major franchises.8
While Paquin’s earnings would have been on a different scale, her integral role in films that consistently grossed hundreds of millions worldwide provided a significant financial foundation early in her adult career.
One unconfirmed report even suggests a salary of $3.7 million for just two weeks of work on one film, hinting at the lucrative nature of her participation in such a high-profile series.16
The adjusted worldwide box office for
X-Men: Days of Future Past alone topped $1 billion, illustrating the sheer scale of this blue-chip asset.17
The strategic value of this holding was just as significant as its financial return.
The role of Rogue provided the perfect bridge for Paquin’s career, allowing her to navigate the notoriously treacherous transition from respected child actor to mainstream adult star.5
It is a leap that has ended many promising careers, but by embedding herself in a beloved Marvel property, Paquin achieved it seamlessly.
She gained global, multi-generational name recognition, establishing a “blue-chip” brand that holds its value across decades and markets.
This early investment in a blue-chip franchise also served as a critical form of brand diversification, a strategic move that would pay enormous dividends later in her career.
An actor’s brand is one of their most vital assets, and being known for a single iconic role, however successful, can become a gilded cage.
By the time True Blood ended in 2014, Paquin had already been established in the public consciousness for 14 years as the mutant Rogue.
This created a powerful dual identity.
She was not just Sookie Stackhouse, the telepathic waitress from Bon Temps; she was also a foundational member of the X-Men.
This diversification gave her a much broader brand footprint, preventing the typecasting that can follow the conclusion of a long-running, character-defining television show.
It endowed her career with greater resilience and a wider range of perceived casting opportunities, from intimate dramas to large-scale productions.
Table 1: Anna Paquin’s Portfolio Snapshot – Key Earnings & Assets
| Asset Class | Asset Description | Estimated Financial Value / Context | Source(s) |
| Anchor Asset | True Blood (HBO Series, 2008-2014) | Estimated Total Salary: ~$22 million ($275,000/episode for 80 episodes) | 4 |
| Blue-Chip Holding | X-Men Franchise (2000-2014) | Salary not public; key role in a multi-billion dollar global franchise. | 14 |
| Tangible Asset | Venice, CA Home (with Stephen Moyer) | Purchase: ~$2M. Peak Listing: $14M. Current Listing: $7M. | 18 |
| Venture Capital | Paquin Films / Producing Credits | Value is in creative control, artistic equity, and potential future returns. | 4 |
The Venture Capital Wing: Producing, Indies, and Building Artistic Credibility
With a portfolio anchored by a stable annuity and fortified by blue-chip holdings, a savvy investor can afford to allocate capital to higher-risk ventures.
In Anna Paquin’s career, this “Venture Capital” wing is represented by her deliberate and consistent investment in projects focused on long-term artistic credibility and creative control, often over short-term financial gain.
This demonstrates her evolution from an actress-for-hire to a genuine creative force.
The most concrete manifestation of this strategy is her work as a producer.
Alongside her brother, Andrew, she formed Paquin Films, a production company designed to develop and produce projects.21
This was not a vanity endeavor.
Paquin has served as a hands-on producer or executive producer on a slate of her own projects, including the films
Blue State, Free Ride, and The Parting Glass, and the television series Bellevue and Flack.4
In interviews, she candidly describes herself as a “gigantic control freak” in a productive sense, someone who cares deeply about the details and knows how to get things done on a set without shouting.22
This is the language of an entrepreneur, not just an actress.
By taking on the producer role, she invests her time and reputation to gain a stake in the final product and a say in the stories being told.
Alongside her producing work, Paquin has consistently allocated her on-screen time to “art-house” investments.
These are roles in critically acclaimed but often less commercial films, chosen for their artistic merit rather than their box-office potential.
Her small but powerful role as Peggy Sheeran, the silently judging daughter in Martin Scorsese’s masterpiece The Irishman, is a prime example.3
Sharing the screen with legends like Robert De Niro, Al Pacino, and Joe Pesci under the direction of Scorsese is an investment that pays incalculable dividends in artistic capital.
Other key investments in this vein include her work in Kenneth Lonergan’s famously troubled but brilliant
Margaret, the indie darling The Squid and the Whale, and the intimate drama Tell It to the Bees.4
In discussing a film like
The Parting Glass, Paquin herself articulated the VC mindset: “You don’t do it for the finance, and glory…
You do it because of the love of the art — because of stories that you passionately want to tell”.28
This entire “Venture Capital” strategy represents a deliberate reinvestment of the capital—both financial and reputational—earned from her more commercial successes.
The logic is clear and mirrors that of a classic VC fund.
The immense financial flexibility gained from the “Blue-Chip” X-Men films and the “Anchor” asset of True Blood is not simply hoarded or spent on a lavish lifestyle.
Instead, it is strategically re-allocated into these passion projects.
Working with a director like Scorsese on The Irishman generates a massive infusion of artistic credibility, an intangible asset that enhances her brand and makes her more attractive to other elite creators.
This, in turn, opens doors to a different caliber of future projects, creating a virtuous cycle of quality and relevance.
It is the classic VC trade-off: forgoing a guaranteed, immediate return (the paycheck from a more formulaic studio film) for a stake in something with potentially explosive future value.
In this context, that value is not just financial, but is measured in sustained artistic relevance, industry respect, and the power to continue shaping her own career decades after her debut.
It is a strategy built not for a single big score, but for a lifetime of meaningful work.
The Tangible Asset Ledger: A Deep Dive into the Venice Real Estate Play
While much of an actor’s portfolio is tied up in intangible assets like brand equity and future earning potential, tangible assets like real estate offer a concrete and illuminating window into their wealth strategy.
For Anna Paquin and her husband, fellow actor Stephen Moyer, their home in Venice, California, serves as a powerful microcosm of the entire “Paquin Portfolio” itself: a high-quality, unique asset whose paper value is subject to significant market volatility and the whims of public perception.
The couple didn’t just buy a house; they embarked on a significant value-add investment.
After acquiring the property in 2009-2010 for a price reported between $1.23 million and $2.2 million, they commissioned a seven-year architectural project.19
They enlisted the renowned environmental architect David Hertz, known for his sustainable design, to transform what was originally a humble beach cottage and a vacant lot into a modern, 7,100-square-foot masterpiece.20
The resulting home is a bespoke creation, featuring unique and historically significant materials like reclaimed Alaskan yellow cedar and, most notably, wood sourced from the original cedar benches of the Hollywood Bowl from 1919.19
With a guesthouse, pool, Zen garden, and fitness room, the property is a one-of-a-kind luxury compound.18
The journey of this asset on the real estate market tells a fascinating story about the gap between intrinsic value and market price.
Having invested years of time and significant capital into its creation, Paquin and Moyer initially listed the home in 2020 with an ambitious asking price of $14 million.18
This figure represented their peak valuation of the asset—the sum of its land, construction, unique materials, and architectural prestige.
However, the market had other ideas.
The property lingered, and in January 2024, the price was dramatically slashed to $8 million.
By July 2024, it was reduced again to $7 million.18
In the interim, it was also offered on the high-end rental market for as much as $35,000 per month.19
Table 2: The Venice Property Valuation Timeline
| Date | Event | Price / Value | Source(s) |
| 2010 | Purchase | ~$1.23M – $2.2M | 19 |
| 2020 | Initial Listing | $14,000,000 | 18 |
| Jan. 2024 | Price Reduction 1 | $8,000,000 | 18 |
| July 2024 | Price Reduction 2 | $7,000,000 | 18 |
This tangible asset’s journey serves as a perfect allegory for Paquin’s entire career portfolio.
Just as she has invested decades into building a unique, high-quality career, she and Moyer invested years into creating a bespoke, high-value home.
The initial $14 million asking price can be seen as the “intrinsic value” of the asset—what they believe it is worth based on its quality and inputs.
The market’s response, however, forcing the valuation down by half, demonstrates that the “market price”—what someone is willing to pay at a given moment—can be dramatically different.
This directly mirrors the public analysis of her net worth.
Her portfolio of work possesses immense intrinsic value—an Oscar, a Golden Globe, multiple iconic roles, and a reputation for excellence.
Yet its “market price,” the estimated $14 million net worth figure, can seem lower than expected when compared to peers who pursued different, perhaps more commercially focused, strategies.
The Venice house is a tangible, physical lesson in the often-painful gap between perceived value and liquid cash value, a dynamic that defines the financial lives of even the most successful artists.
Risk Management & The Intangible Moat: The Value of a Scandal-Free Brand
In the world of high-stakes portfolio management, generating returns is only half the battle.
Protecting those returns from catastrophic risk is equally, if not more, important.
The most valuable assets in Anna Paquin’s portfolio are the ones that don’t appear on any balance sheet: her formidable “intangible moat.” This is not a passive quality but an active, long-term risk management strategy, built on professionalism and integrity, that has protected her entire portfolio from the risks that have destroyed countless others.
The first and most critical pillar of this moat was her successful navigation of child stardom.
The path from child actor to stable, successful adult is one of the most perilous in any industry, littered with cautionary tales.32
Paquin is a prime example of a seamless and healthy transition, having avoided any of the public scandals or personal crises that so often accompany early fame.13
She has credited this stability to a grounded, unconventional upbringing where her parents prioritized her education and well-being over the glitz of Hollywood.
She noted in an interview that if she “was a complete monster to be around, my parents wouldn’t have let me continue to work”.36
This early foundation of normalcy and discipline was a form of risk mitigation that has paid dividends for her entire adult life.
The second pillar is her unwavering professionalism.
In an industry built on relationships and reputation, Paquin is known as a consummate professional.
She has worked with the same core team of agents and managers since she was a child, a sign of loyalty and stability.22
She prides herself on being a collaborative “team player” who understands that filmmaking is a group effort, a perspective she gained from growing up on sets and befriending the crew.22
This reputation is a priceless asset, ensuring her continued employability and making her a desirable partner for any production.
The third pillar is her authentic and principled public persona.
Her activism is not a calculated PR move but a reflection of her genuine beliefs.
When she came out as bisexual in 2010, it was as part of a public service announcement for the “Give a Damn” campaign, an advocacy group dedicated to LGBT equality.4
Her philanthropic support extends to numerous other causes, including the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and the Elton John AIDS Foundation.4
This builds a brand grounded in integrity, which resonates deeply with modern audiences and makes her a more attractive and, crucially, less risky partner for studios and brands.
This “Intangible Moat” is not merely a collection of positive personality traits; it is a financial strategy with a quantifiable, albeit indirect, positive impact on her net worth.
A single major scandal can instantly evaporate an actor’s brand equity, leading to lost roles, dropped endorsements, and a catastrophic decline in earning potential.
The financial cost of such a risk event is immense.
By actively cultivating a reputation for stability, professionalism, and integrity over three decades, Paquin has minimized her exposure to this specific, high-impact risk.
The “cost” of this strategy is a less sensational, less headline-grabbing public profile.
The “return” on this investment is a remarkably stable and durable career.
Therefore, every dollar in her $14 million net worth is arguably more secure and less volatile than the wealth of a more controversial peer.
The absence of negative events is, in itself, a significant financial positive.
The low-risk profile of the Paquin brand is a core component of her portfolio’s overall health and resilience.
Conclusion: The Final Valuation – A Blueprint for Longevity in Hollywood
When viewed through the portfolio management framework, Anna Paquin’s estimated $14 million net worth 3 transforms from a simple, static number into the logical outcome of a sophisticated, multi-decade career strategy.
It is not an accident, nor is it the result of a linear accumulation of paychecks.
It is the calculated result of a brilliantly managed and diversified portfolio that has consistently prioritized resilience, artistic integrity, and creative control alongside financial gain.
The true meaning of this valuation becomes crystal clear when placed in its proper context: a comparison with her peers from her most significant projects.
Table 3: Comparative Net Worth – True Blood & X-Men Ensembles
| Actor | Key Franchise(s) | Estimated Net Worth | Source(s) |
| Anna Paquin | True Blood, X-Men | $14 million | 3 |
| Stephen Moyer | True Blood | $10 million | 39 |
| Alexander Skarsgård | True Blood | $14 million | 42 |
| Ryan Kwanten | True Blood | $6 million | 44 |
| Sam Trammell | True Blood | $4 million | 46 |
| — | — | — | — |
| Hugh Jackman | X-Men | $100 million – $180 million | 6 |
| Patrick Stewart | X-Men, Star Trek | $75 million | 8 |
| Halle Berry | X-Men | $90 million | 48 |
| Ian McKellen | X-Men, Lord of the Rings | $60 million | 51 |
| Famke Janssen | X-Men | $20 million | 52 |
This table illuminates the entire thesis.
Within the True Blood ensemble, Paquin’s net worth is at the top, on par with her co-lead Alexander Skarsgård and ahead of her husband Stephen Moyer, reflecting her central role in that “Anchor Asset.”
The comparison to her X-Men co-stars, however, is where the strategic divergence becomes apparent.
Her net worth is a fraction of that of the franchise centerpieces like Hugh Jackman and Patrick Stewart, or established A-listers like Halle Berry.
This disparity is not a marker of failure but a clear illustration of different portfolio strategies.
Jackman, Stewart, and Berry maximized their returns in a single, massive asset class, becoming the financial focal points of their respective franchises.
Their portfolios were heavily weighted toward generating peak valuation from blockbuster roles.
Anna Paquin chose a different path.
She built a more balanced and diversified portfolio.
She balanced her “Blue-Chip” blockbuster holdings with a stable television “Annuity,” and then used the capital from both to invest in a “Venture Capital” wing of riskier, high-credibility artistic ventures.
Her portfolio is built for longevity and control, not just for achieving the highest possible peak valuation.
It is a portfolio designed to weather industry storms, to avoid the pitfalls of typecasting, and to grant her the freedom to pursue work that is personally and artistically fulfilling.
The Paquin Portfolio, therefore, serves as a powerful and compelling blueprint for achieving sustainable success in the modern entertainment industry.
It proves that true, lasting value is built not by relentlessly chasing the highest number, but by strategically diversifying assets, actively managing risk, and investing in the one thing that can never be fully captured on a balance sheet: a credible, resilient, and authentic personal brand.
Works cited
- eli5 How do they calculate celebrity net worth? : r/explainlikeimfive – Reddit, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/tykofo/eli5_how_do_they_calculate_celebrity_net_worth/
- How Is Net Worth Calculated? Net Worth Methodology, Explained, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://marketrealist.com/p/how-is-net-worth-calculated/
- Anna Pacquin Net Worth 2024: What Is The “True Blood” Star Worth? – HotNewHipHop, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/784428-anna-paquin-net-worth
- Anna Paquin – Wikipedia, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Paquin
- Anna Paquin | Booking Agent | Talent Roster – MN2S, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://mn2s.com/booking-agency/talent-roster/anna-paquin/
- Who are the 9 richest Marvel stars in 2024? Net worths, ranked …, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/entertainment/article/3253235/who-are-9-richest-marvel-stars-2024-net-worths-ranked-scarlett-johansson-bradley-cooper-chris
- Hugh Jackman’s Net Worth in 2025 Proves It Pays to Be The Greatest Showman – Parade, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://parade.com/celebrities/hugh-jackman-net-worth
- Patrick Stewart Net Worth (2025) From Star Trek, Picard, X-Men, American Dad – Parade, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://parade.com/celebrities/patrick-stewart-net-worth
- Ever googled a celebrity’s net worth? Here’s what it means and how to, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://etedge-insights.com/featured-insights/ever-googled-a-celebritys-net-worth-heres-what-it-actually-means-and-how-to-calculate-yours/
- The Big Bang Theory cast get paid HOW much?, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/entertainment/news/a28490/big-bang-highest-paid-tv-stars/
- The ‘Oscar bump’: Does an Academy Awards win boost actors’ earnings? | London Evening Standard, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.standard.co.uk/business/the-oscar-bump-does-an-academy-awards-win-boost-actors-earnings-a3191516.html
- The Richest Co-Stars of ‘True Blood,’ Ranked in Net Worth From …, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.justjared.com/2023/03/07/the-richest-members-of-true-blood-ranked-in-net-worth-from-lowest-to-highest/
- What ever happened to Anna Paquin? : r/movies – Reddit, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/139nwar/what_ever_happened_to_anna_paquin/
- Anna Paquin – Biography – HELLO! magazine, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.hellomagazine.com/profiles/20091008142/anna-paquin/
- Hugh Jackman’s Net Worth (& How Much He Made From Playing Wolverine) – Screen Rant, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://screenrant.com/hugh-jackman-net-worth-how-much-wolverine/
- Actor/Actress who were highly billed, yet had a small role in the movie – Reddit, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/fn2msd/actoractress_who_were_highly_billed_yet_had_a/
- Anna Paquin Movies | Ultimate Movie Rankings, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.ultimatemovierankings.com/anna-paquin-movies/
- ‘True Blood’ Star Anna Paquin Slices the Price Again on Her L.A. …, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.realtor.com/news/celebrity-real-estate/anna-paquin-cuts-price-again-on-her-venice-home-now-asking-7m/
- ‘True Blood’ Actress Anna Paquin Slashes the Price on Her Rustic Venice, CA, Home to $8M – SFGATE, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.sfgate.com/realestate/article/true-blood-actress-anna-paquin-slashes-the-18637083.php
- Anna Paquin and Stephen Moyer’s L.A. Home for Sale for $8 Million – People Magazine, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://people.com/anna-paquin-los-angeles-home-for-sale-8557199
- Anna Paquin – Wikiwand, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Anna_Paquin
- HFPA in Conversation: Anna Paquin is a Team Player – Golden Globes, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://goldenglobes.com/articles/hfpa-conversation-anna-paquin-team-player/
- CO-PRODUCTION GUIDE – TMCnet, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2006/09/11/1878123.htm
- Anna Paquin Film Credits – Movie Insider, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.movieinsider.com/p1658/anna-paquin
- Anna Paquin: ‘I am absolutely a control freak. It’s in my DNA’ | Life and style | The Guardian, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/aug/24/this-much-i-know-anna-paquin-xmen-the-piano-true-blood
- Anna Paquin: ‘My Oscar? It’s not the highlight of my career’ | Life and style | The Guardian, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/jul/27/anna-paquin-interview-oscar-not-highlight-of-career
- Anna Paquin Films and Shows – Apple TV, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://tv.apple.com/gb/person/anna-paquin/umc.cpc.m17u8simuvisb5xybto0s4ib
- ‘True Blood’ Star Anna Paquin Talks Love of Independent Filmmaking – YouTube, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gse3W73FHvY
- Anna Paquin and Stephen Moyer list Californian retreat – Elite Agent, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://eliteagent.com/anna-paquin-and-stephen-moyer-list-californian-retreat/
- ‘True Blood’ Actress Anna Paquin Slashes the Price on Her Rustic Venice, CA, Home to $8M – Realtor.com, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.realtor.com/news/celebrity-real-estate/anna-paquin-now-asking-8m-for-her-venice-california-home/
- Anna Paquin and Stephen Moyer’s Venice Beach home is a modern architectural jewel – listed for $8 million, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.homesandgardens.com/celebrity-style/anna-paquin-stephen-moyer-house-sale
- en.wikipedia.org, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_actor#:~:text=Other%20examples%20are%20Roddy%20McDowall,which%20had%20its%20own%20successful
- From Child Stars to Adult Success: Where Are They Now? – sices, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://sicesgroup.com/from-child-stars-to-adult-success-where-are-they-now/
- 32 child stars who actually became successful actors – Woman&Home, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.womanandhome.com/life/news-entertainment/child-stars-who-became-successful-actors-as-adults/
- 11 Child Stars Whose Hollywood Success Continued into Adulthood – MovieWeb, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://movieweb.com/child-stars-hollywood-success-adult/
- Anna Paquin Cover Interview – Red magazine, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.redonline.co.uk/red-women/interviews/a504363/anna-paquin/
- Anna Paquin: “I’m Bisexual and I Give a Damn.” – GO Magazine, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://gomag.com/article/anna_paquin_im_bisexual_a/
- The Richest Co-Stars of ‘True Blood,’ Ranked in Net Worth From Lowest to Highest | Adina Porter, Alexander Skarsgard, Anna Paquin, Carrie Preston, Chris Bauer, Deborah Ann Woll, EG, evergreen, Extended, HBO, Jim Parrack, Joe Manganiello, Jurnee Smollett, Jurnee Smollett-Bell, Kristin Bauer van Straten, Lauren Bowles, Michael McMillian, Rutina Wesley, Ryan Kwanten, Sam Trammell, Slideshow, Stephen Moyer, Todd Lowe, True Blood, William Sanderson | Just Jared: Celebrity Gossip and Breaking Entertainment News, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.justjared.com/2023/03/07/the-richest-members-of-true-blood-ranked-in-net-worth-from-lowest-to-highest/17/
- The Richest ‘True Blood’ Stars, Ranked From Lowest to Highest Net Worth | Adina Porter, Alexander Skarsgard, Anna Paquin, Carrie Preston, Chris Bauer, Deborah Ann Woll, EG, evergreen, Extended, HBO, Jim Parrack, Joe Manganiello, Jurnee Smollett, Jurnee Smollett-Bell, Kristin Bauer van Straten, Lauren Bowles, Michael McMillian, Rutina Wesley, Ryan Kwanten, Sam Trammell, Slideshow, Stephen Moyer, Todd Lowe, True Blood, William Sanderson | Just Jared: Celebrity Gossip and Breaking Entertainment News, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.justjared.com/2024/01/31/the-richest-true-blood-stars-ranked-from-lowest-to-highest-net-worth/9/
- Stephen Moyer Net Worth 2024: What Is The “True Blood” Star Worth? – Pinterest, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.pinterest.com/pin/stephen-moyer-net-worth-2024-what-is-the-true-blood-star-worth–1112670651680336422/
- Stephen Moyer Net Worth 2024: What Is The “True Blood” Star Worth? – HotNewHipHop, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/785485-stephen-moyer-net-worth
- Alexander Skarsgård – News, Photos, Videos, Movies or Albums – Yahoo UK, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://uk.yahoo.com/topics/alexander-skarsg%C3%A5rd/
- The Richest Co-Stars of ‘True Blood,’ Ranked in Net Worth From Lowest to Highest | Adina Porter, Alexander Skarsgard, Anna Paquin, Carrie Preston, Chris Bauer, Deborah Ann Woll, EG, evergreen, Extended, HBO, Jim Parrack, Joe Manganiello, Jurnee Smollett, Jurnee Smollett-Bell, Kristin Bauer van Straten, Lauren Bowles, Michael McMillian, Rutina Wesley, Ryan Kwanten, Sam Trammell, Slideshow, Stephen Moyer, Todd Lowe, True Blood, William Sanderson | Just Jared: Celebrity Gossip and Breaking Entertainment News, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.justjared.com/2023/03/07/the-richest-members-of-true-blood-ranked-in-net-worth-from-lowest-to-highest/18/
- The Richest Co-Stars of ‘True Blood,’ Ranked in Net Worth From Lowest to Highest | Adina Porter, Alexander Skarsgard, Anna Paquin, Carrie Preston, Chris Bauer, Deborah Ann Woll, EG, evergreen, Extended, HBO, Jim Parrack, Joe Manganiello, Jurnee Smollett, Jurnee Smollett-Bell, Kristin Bauer van Straten, Lauren Bowles, Michael McMillian, Rutina Wesley, Ryan Kwanten, Sam Trammell, Slideshow, Stephen Moyer, Todd Lowe, True Blood, William Sanderson | Just Jared: Celebrity Gossip and Breaking Entertainment News, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.justjared.com/2023/03/07/the-richest-members-of-true-blood-ranked-in-net-worth-from-lowest-to-highest/15/
- The Richest ‘True Blood’ Stars, Ranked From Lowest to Highest Net Worth | Adina Porter, Alexander Skarsgard, Anna Paquin, Carrie Preston, Chris Bauer, Deborah Ann Woll, EG, evergreen, Extended, HBO, Jim Parrack, Joe Manganiello, Jurnee Smollett, Jurnee Smollett-Bell, Kristin Bauer van Straten, Lauren Bowles, Michael McMillian, Rutina Wesley, Ryan Kwanten, Sam Trammell, Slideshow, Stephen Moyer, Todd Lowe, True Blood, William Sanderson | Just Jared: Celebrity Gossip and Breaking Entertainment News, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.justjared.com/2024/01/31/the-richest-true-blood-stars-ranked-from-lowest-to-highest-net-worth/8/
- The Richest ‘True Blood’ Stars, Ranked From Lowest to Highest Net Worth | Adina Porter, Alexander Skarsgard, Anna Paquin, Carrie Preston, Chris Bauer, Deborah Ann Woll, EG, evergreen, Extended, HBO, Jim Parrack, Joe Manganiello, Jurnee Smollett, Jurnee Smollett-Bell, Kristin Bauer van Straten, Lauren Bowles, Michael McMillian, Rutina Wesley, Ryan Kwanten, Sam Trammell, Slideshow, Stephen Moyer, Todd Lowe, True Blood, William Sanderson | Just Jared: Celebrity Gossip and Breaking Entertainment News, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.justjared.com/2024/01/31/the-richest-true-blood-stars-ranked-from-lowest-to-highest-net-worth/7/
- The Richest Co-Stars of ‘True Blood,’ Ranked in Net Worth From Lowest to Highest | Adina Porter, Alexander Skarsgard, Anna Paquin, Carrie Preston, Chris Bauer, Deborah Ann Woll, EG, evergreen, Extended, HBO, Jim Parrack, Joe Manganiello, Jurnee Smollett, Jurnee Smollett-Bell, Kristin Bauer van Straten, Lauren Bowles, Michael McMillian, Rutina Wesley, Ryan Kwanten, Sam Trammell, Slideshow, Stephen Moyer, Todd Lowe, True Blood, William Sanderson | Just Jared: Celebrity Gossip and Breaking Entertainment News, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.justjared.com/2023/03/07/the-richest-members-of-true-blood-ranked-in-net-worth-from-lowest-to-highest/12/
- Halle Berry Is Having a Ball With Her Monster Net Worth – Parade, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://parade.com/celebrities/halle-berry-net-worth
- Halle Berry’s net worth revealed, plus monthly child support payments to exes Gabriel Aubry and Olivier Martinez – HELLO! magazine, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.hellomagazine.com/celebrities/501013/halle-berry-net-worth-revealed-plus-monthly-child-support-payments/
- What Is Halle Berry’s Net Worth? Here’s How the ‘Bruised’ Actress Earned Her Fortune, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.purewow.com/entertainment/halle-berry-net-worth
- 13 richest The Lord of The Rings and The Hobbit cast members – net worths, ranked: from Orlando Bloom and Sherlock stars Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman, to Cate Blanchett and Elijah Wood | South China Morning Post, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/celebrity/article/3190892/13-richest-lord-rings-and-hobbit-cast-members-net-worths
- Famke Janssen Plastic Surgery: Learn Only The Facts – Vera Clinic, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.veraclinic.net/famke-janssen-plastic-surgery/
- Top 12 richest Bond villain actors stars ranked by net worth : r/JamesBond – Reddit, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/JamesBond/comments/1it82tf/top_12_richest_bond_villain_actors_stars_ranked/
