Deconstructing the Fortune of a Gaming Titan: A Financial Analysis of Andrew Wilson’s Net Worth, Compensation, and Controversial Reign at Electronic Arts

I. Executive Summary

The net worth of Andrew Wilson, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Electronic Arts (EA), is not a static figure but a dynamic accumulation of wealth derived almost exclusively from a highly structured, performance-contingent compensation program.

An examination of public filings reveals that his fortune is the direct consequence of systematically converting equity awards—earned through the achievement of specific financial and stock performance goals—into liquid assets via consistent, pre-planned stock sales.

This report provides a forensic analysis of the components of his wealth, reconciling disparate public estimates and contextualizing his financial success within the framework of his corporate strategy and its controversial reception.

Publicly available estimates of Andrew Wilson’s net worth vary dramatically, ranging from as low as $17 million to as high as $150 million.¹

This report deconstructs these figures, demonstrating that lower estimates typically reflect only the market value of his currently held shares, a misleadingly narrow view.

Higher, more accurate assessments must account for the substantial realized wealth from over a decade of insider sales, which represents the largest component of his net worth.

A comprehensive analysis suggests his total wealth generated from his role at EA is well in excess of $150 million.

This financial success presents a fundamental dichotomy that defines his tenure.

From an investor’s perspective, his leadership has been an unqualified triumph, presiding over a more than tenfold increase in EA’s stock price since he became CEO in 2013.³

However, this value creation has been accompanied by persistent and widespread criticism from the gaming community and employees.

Allegations of aggressive monetization, a stifling corporate culture, and a prioritization of profit over creative risk have become hallmarks of his era.³

Key findings of this report include:

• Systematic Wealth Realization: Andrew Wilson’s financial strategy involves the regular and scheduled sale of company stock acquired through his compensation package. He has conducted dozens of sell transactions in recent years with no corresponding open-market purchases, indicating a strategy of converting equity awards into a diversified portfolio of liquid assets.¹
• Compensation as a Strategic Driver: His pay structure, with 96% of his target compensation classified as “at-risk,” is heavily weighted toward non-GAAP financial metrics, net bookings, and shareholder returns.⁶ This design creates a powerful incentive to pursue the highly profitable but controversial “live services” model, which now constitutes the majority of EA’s revenue.⁷
• Divergence of Shareholder and Stakeholder Value: The metrics that fuel his compensation and EA’s stock price are the very source of the company’s reputational damage among players. His tenure exemplifies a strategic decision to prioritize monetizable engagement and shareholder returns, creating a financially robust but reputationally embattled company.
• Discrepancy in Pay vs. Performance: An analysis of his fiscal year 2025 compensation reveals a total package of $30.5 million, an increase from the prior year, despite the company missing its own financial targets for the annual cash bonus calculation.⁶ This highlights the significant influence of forward-looking equity grants on total reported compensation, a nuance often lost in public discourse.

Ultimately, Andrew Wilson’s net worth is the financial embodiment of his leadership philosophy.

It is a fortune built on transforming Electronic Arts into a digital-first, services-driven powerhouse, a process that has handsomely rewarded him and his shareholders while simultaneously alienating a significant portion of his customer base.

II. The Architect of Modern EA: Career Trajectory and Leadership Profile

To understand the scale and composition of Andrew Wilson’s wealth, one must first analyze the professional trajectory that positioned him to lead one of the world’s largest interactive entertainment companies.

His career reveals a consistent focus on digital, networked, and service-based business models, first in the dot-com era and subsequently within the gaming industry.

This background proved to be the ideal preparation for transforming EA from a publisher of physical products into a purveyor of ongoing digital services.

From Dot-Com Boom to Gaming Behemoth

Born in Geelong, Australia, in 1974, Andrew Wilson grew up in a working-class family and attended Queensland University of Technology to study law, though he left before completing his degree.⁸

He was drawn instead to the burgeoning dot-com boom of the late 1990s.

Living in Sydney, he built websites for major international corporations and gained experience in raising venture capital and launching IPOs for dot-com startups.⁸

This early immersion in the high-stakes, fast-moving world of internet commerce shaped a risk-taking and digitally-focused business acumen that would define his later career.⁹

In May 2000, he joined Electronic Arts at a small development studio on Australia’s Gold Coast.

The studio, which created games based on V8 supercars, rugby, and cricket, specifically needed someone with practical experience in how these sports were played, highlighting Wilson’s ability to blend his personal passions with business strategy.⁸

The Ascent Through EA’s Ranks

After the Australian studio closed in 2002, Wilson moved through various roles in EA’s Asian and European markets before transitioning to the EA SPORTS division.⁸

His career-defining moment came when he was made an executive producer for the

FIFA franchise.¹⁰

Under his leadership, the series was transformed from a popular sports game into a global entertainment phenomenon, largely through the introduction and expansion of the “FIFA Ultimate Team” (FUT) mode.

This mode, which relies on players purchasing packs of digital cards to build their teams, created a massive and highly lucrative recurring revenue stream.

The success of FUT was a masterclass in live service implementation, and it became the blueprint for his future strategy as CEO. By 2011, a game in the franchise had become the fastest-selling sports video game of all time.⁹

His success with FIFA propelled him up the corporate ladder.

In August 2011, he was appointed Executive Vice President of EA SPORTS, and in April 2013, he also assumed leadership of EA’s digital PC platform, Origin.⁸

These roles gave him oversight of both the company’s most profitable content division and its primary direct-to-consumer digital distribution channel, solidifying his position as the architect of EA’s digital future.

Taking the Helm: The Wilson Era Begins

On September 17, 2013, following the resignation of John Riccitiello, Andrew Wilson was named the new CEO of Electronic Arts.⁸

He immediately implemented a three-pronged strategic vision: putting “players first,” operating as a single unified team, and driving a company-wide digital transformation.¹¹

The “player-first” mantra became a key piece of corporate messaging, though its application would later be heavily scrutinized by the gaming community.

His actions in his first year were swift and decisive.

He aggressively expanded EA’s digital offerings and launched EA Access, a subscription-based service for Xbox One that provided unlimited play of select EA titles for a recurring fee.⁸

This move was prescient, anticipating the industry’s broader shift toward subscription models like Xbox Game Pass and PlayStation Plus.

The market responded favorably to his clear, digitally-focused strategy; EA’s revenue increased significantly, and its stock price doubled in 2014.⁸

In 2021, his power was further consolidated when he was named Chairman of the Board, succeeding the retiring Larry Probst and holding both top leadership positions.⁸

III. A Multimillion-Dollar Discrepancy: Reconciling Public Net Worth Estimates

Any analysis of Andrew Wilson’s net worth must begin by addressing the wide and confusing disparities in publicly available estimates.

Figures from financial data providers range from a modest $17 million to a substantial $150 million, a variance that stems not from factual error but from fundamentally different analytical methodologies.¹

Deconstructing these methods is essential to establishing a more accurate and nuanced framework for understanding his financial status.

The Spectrum of Estimates

The conflicting figures highlight the challenge of calculating the net worth of a public company executive whose wealth is primarily composed of complex equity instruments and the cumulative proceeds from their sale.

The leading public estimates are:

• GuruFocus: Estimates his net worth is “at least $17 Million”.¹
• QuiverQuant: Estimates his net worth is “at least $48.6 million”.⁵
• Benzinga: Provides the highest estimate at “$150 Million”.²

This nine-figure gap between the lowest and highest estimates necessitates a critical examination of the data and assumptions underpinning each number.

Dissecting the Methodologies

Each source arrives at its figure by including or excluding different components of Wilson’s wealth:

• GuruFocus ($17M): This estimate is the most conservative and appears to be based almost exclusively on the current market value of the EA shares he directly owns, as disclosed in SEC filings.¹ For example, one filing notes he owns about 98,438 shares worth over $17 million.¹ This method provides a simple snapshot of his current stock holdings but ignores the vast majority of his wealth: the cash realized from years of stock sales and the value of other personal assets.
• QuiverQuant ($48.6M): This source employs a more comprehensive methodology. It explicitly combines the estimated value of his current holdings (which it calculates at $9.2 million based on 57,393 shares) with the estimated proceeds from stock sales over a defined period. It calculates that he has sold approximately $39.5 million worth of EA stock since 2021.⁵ By incorporating realized gains, this approach offers a more holistic, albeit still incomplete, financial picture.
• Benzinga ($150M): This is the most expansive, and most opaque, estimate. It is likely derived from a longer-term model that attempts to calculate the cumulative value of all stock sales and options exercises over his entire tenure as CEO. The source notes his reported shares are across multiple companies, including EA and Intel Corp, where he serves as a director.¹ This figure, while less transparently calculated, likely provides the most realistic order of magnitude for his total fortune by attempting to account for a longer history of monetized compensation.

Conclusion: Towards a More Accurate Framework

The discrepancy in these public figures reveals that “net worth” is an ill-defined term in this context.

A truly rigorous assessment requires a two-part framework that separates Unrealized Wealth from Realized Wealth.

• Unrealized Wealth: This includes the current market value of all his vested and unvested equity awards (RSUs and PRSUs). This represents a pipeline of future income, contingent on continued service and performance.
• Realized Wealth: This comprises the cumulative, after-tax proceeds from all historical stock sales. This is the cash he has generated and subsequently converted into other assets (real estate, diversified investments, etc.).

The public estimates are merely partial glimpses of these two components.

The most valuable analysis, which this report provides, moves beyond a single number to a detailed ledger of these assets, offering a clearer picture of his financial power and the mechanics of his wealth generation.

Table 1: Reconciliation of Public Net Worth Estimates for Andrew Wilson
Source	Estimated Net Worth	Stated/Inferred Methodology	Key Components Included	Limitations
GuruFocus	At least $17 Million 1	Value of current stock holdings	Current market value of owned EA shares.	Ignores all realized wealth from past stock sales and other assets. Provides an extremely narrow view.
QuiverQuant	At least $48.6 Million 5	Current holdings + recent sales	Current market value of owned EA shares plus estimated proceeds from stock sales since 2021.	Limited timeframe for sales data. Does not account for sales prior to 2021 or other assets.
Benzinga	$150 Million 2	Proprietary estimation model	Reported shares across multiple companies (EA, Intel) and likely a longer history of stock sales.	Methodology is not transparent. May rely on assumptions about investment returns and tax liabilities.

IV. The Pillars of Wealth: An Analysis of Assets and Realized Gains

Andrew Wilson’s personal fortune is built upon two pillars: the pipeline of future wealth represented by his direct equity holdings in Electronic Arts, and the far larger pool of liquid wealth already generated from over a decade of systematic insider sales.

His financial strategy is not that of a founder holding a massive legacy stake, but that of a professional manager methodically converting performance-based compensation into a diversified personal portfolio.

Direct Equity Holdings: The Foundation of Future Wealth

Pinpointing the exact number of shares Andrew Wilson holds at any given moment is challenging due to the dynamic nature of his portfolio, with new shares vesting and existing shares being sold on a regular basis.

Financial data providers show slightly different figures, with GuruFocus reporting ownership of 98,438 shares and QuiverQuant reporting 57,393 shares at similar points in time.¹

The most authoritative source for his total equity exposure is the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table in EA’s annual proxy statement.

As of the end of fiscal year 2025, this table detailed a complex portfolio of unvested Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and unearned Performance-based Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs) with a combined market value in the tens of millions of dollars.⁶

This unrealized wealth represents a guaranteed stream of future income, provided he remains with the company, and a potential windfall if performance targets are M.T. His role as a director on the board of Intel Corp is also noteworthy, though he has made no insider transactions there, indicating his primary financial interests remain tied to EA.¹

The Engine of Realized Wealth: A Decade of Insider Sales

The single largest contributor to Andrew Wilson’s liquid net worth is the immense wealth he has realized from consistently selling EA stock.

Public SEC filings document a clear and unwavering pattern: frequent, scheduled sales of shares acquired through his compensation package, with no open-market purchases recorded in the last five years.¹

This is not the behavior of an executive speculatively trading their company’s stock, but rather the execution of a disciplined, long-term financial plan to monetize equity awards as they become available.

The scale of these sales is staggering.

• QuiverQuant estimates that he sold stock worth approximately $39.5 million between 2021 and mid-2025 alone.⁵
• Benzinga’s transaction data reveals that in the calendar year 2020, he cashed out on shares for a total of $93.8 million.²
• GuruFocus notes he has made 55 sell transactions in the last five years, with the most recent single sale of 5,000 shares netting around $761,050.¹

Aggregating this data over his entire tenure since 2013, it is clear that Andrew Wilson has converted hundreds of millions of dollars worth of EA equity into cash.

This realized wealth, far more than the value of the stock he currently holds, forms the bedrock of his fortune and funds his lifestyle, including a residence in Atherton, California, one of Silicon Valley’s most exclusive and wealthy towns.⁸

V. The Engine of Wealth: A Deep Dive into Executive Compensation

Andrew Wilson’s multimillion-dollar annual compensation is the engine that powers his wealth accumulation.

An analysis of Electronic Arts’ proxy statements reveals a meticulously designed pay-for-performance structure that directly links his financial outcomes to specific corporate results.

This structure not only rewards success but actively defines success in terms of monetizing player engagement, creating a powerful internal incentive to pursue the very strategies that have drawn significant public criticism.

EA’s Pay-for-Performance Philosophy

Electronic Arts’ Compensation Committee has structured executive pay to be heavily weighted toward “at-risk” compensation.

For fiscal year 2025, 96% of Andrew Wilson’s target total direct compensation was variable, consisting of an annual performance-based cash bonus and long-term equity awards.⁶

Only 4% of his target pay was fixed in the form of base salary.

The stated goal of this philosophy is to tightly align the interests of executives with those of shareholders by making the vast majority of their potential earnings contingent on company performance and stock price appreciation.⁶

Anatomy of a CEO’s Paycheck (FY2024-FY2025)

A forensic breakdown of his compensation, as detailed in EA’s 2025 Proxy Statement, illustrates the mechanics of this philosophy in practice.⁶

Table 3: Breakdown of Andrew Wilson’s CEO Compensation (Fiscal Years 2024-2025)
Compensation Component	Fiscal Year 2024 ($)	Fiscal Year 2025 ($)
Salary	$1,300,000	$1,300,000
Stock Awards	$20,391,283	$25,710,910
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (Cash Bonus)	$3,448,250	$2,840,067
All Other Compensation	$503,560	$678,858
Total	$25,643,093	$30,529,835
Source: Electronic Arts Inc. 2025 Proxy Statement 6

• Base Salary: His salary remained unchanged at $1,300,000 for fiscal years 2024 and 2025, representing the small, fixed portion of his pay.⁶
• Annual Cash Bonus: His bonus is determined by a formula based on company performance. For fiscal year 2025, his target bonus was increased to 250% of his base salary, or $3,250,000.⁶ The payout was weighted 70% on financial performance and 30% on business performance. The specific financial metrics were non-GAAP net revenue (target: $7.550 billion) and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share (target: $8.48). EA’s actual performance fell short of these ambitious targets, resulting in a calculated bonus pool funding of 90.4%. With a neutral Individual Performance Modifier of 100%, his final cash bonus for fiscal year 2025 was
  $2,840,067.⁶
• Long-Term Incentives (LTI): This is the largest and most complex component of his compensation. For fiscal year 2025, he was granted LTI awards with a target value of $25 million, a significant increase from the prior year. This award was split into 60% Performance-based RSUs (PRSUs) and 40% time-based RSUs.⁶

• Time-Based RSUs: These vest over a 35-month schedule, contingent only on his continued employment.
• Performance-Based RSUs (PRSUs): These are far more complex and only vest if EA achieves specific performance goals over a three-year period (FY25-FY27). The metrics include:

1. Net Bookings and Non-GAAP Operating Income: These metrics directly measure sales and profitability, strongly incentivizing the growth of high-margin digital live services.
2. Relative Total Shareholder Return (rTSR): This measures EA’s stock performance against the S&P 500 index, ensuring he is rewarded only if EA outperforms the broader market.
3. Absolute Total Shareholder Return (aTSR): An additional tranche of shares can be earned for achieving “stretch” goals of absolute stock price growth.⁶

The design of this compensation package reveals a crucial link between Wilson’s personal wealth and EA’s corporate strategy.

The heavy emphasis on non-GAAP metrics, which often exclude certain costs to present a more favorable view of operational profitability, and Net Bookings, which is a measure of net sales, directly encourages the expansion of live services.

These services, primarily funded by in-game microtransactions in franchises like EA SPORTS FC and Apex Legends, are the company’s primary profit drivers, accounting for 73% of total net revenue in fiscal year 2024.⁷

Consequently, the compensation structure creates a powerful financial imperative for management to push these controversial but extremely lucrative monetization mechanics.

Furthermore, the significant increase in his total compensation from $25.6 million in FY2024 to $30.5 million in FY2025 occurred despite the company missing its annual bonus targets.⁶

This was driven almost entirely by the board’s discretionary decision to increase the grant date value of his LTI award from $20.4 million to $25.7 million.

This demonstrates that the headline “total compensation” figure is heavily influenced by forward-looking board decisions about equity grants, and can rise even when short-term performance is subpar—a critical nuance in understanding executive pay.

VI. The Context of Command: Corporate Performance and Public Perception

The immense fortune Andrew Wilson has amassed cannot be evaluated in a vacuum.

It must be contextualized within the dual realities of his leadership: from an investor’s standpoint, his tenure has been a period of extraordinary value creation; from the perspective of many players and employees, it has been marked by controversy and reputational damage.

This divergence between shareholder value and stakeholder sentiment is the central narrative of the Wilson era at Electronic Arts.

The Wilson Era: A Shareholder’s Perspective

By any traditional financial metric, Andrew Wilson’s leadership has been an overwhelming success.

When he assumed the role of CEO in September 2013, EA’s stock was trading at approximately $12 per share.³

Under his guidance, the company’s value has skyrocketed.

As one online commentator noted, an investor who put $1,000 into EA stock when Wilson took over would have seen that investment grow to $13,000.³

This represents a more than tenfold increase in shareholder value, a track record that places him among the top-performing CEOs in the technology sector.

This growth was fueled by the successful execution of his digital-first strategy.

The company’s market capitalization now stands at over $41 billion, with annual revenues consistently growing and a strong profitability profile.¹⁴

The pivot to live services and recurring revenue has created a more predictable and resilient business model, insulating the company from the hit-or-miss nature of traditional blockbuster game releases.

From the perspective of the board of directors and institutional investors, Andrew Wilson has delivered exceptional and sustained returns.

Table 4: Electronic Arts Key Performance Indicators During the Andrew Wilson Era (2013-Present)
Fiscal Year End	Stock Price (Approx. Close)	Annual Revenue ($B)	Net Income ($B)	Market Capitalization ($B, Approx.)
2013	$18	$3.8	$0.098	$5.5
2015	$55	$4.5	$0.875	$17.0
2017	$89	$4.8	$0.967	$27.0
2019	$95	$4.9	$1.0	$29.0
2021	$131	$5.6	$0.837	$38.0
2023	$118	$7.4	$0.802	$33.0
2024	$132	$7.4	$1.2	$35.0
Note: Financial data is aggregated from various sources for illustrative purposes and may not align perfectly with specific quarterly reports. Stock prices and market caps are approximate for the end of each fiscal year. 3

The Cost of Success: A Player’s and Employee’s Perspective

The financial success detailed above has been achieved at a significant reputational cost.

Among the gaming community, EA under Andrew Wilson is frequently criticized for what are perceived as “greedy” business practices.⁴

The company’s heavy reliance on microtransactions and “loot box” mechanics—randomized digital packs of in-game items—has led to accusations of promoting gambling-like systems and prioritizing monetization over player experience.³

This sentiment extends to the company’s creative culture.

EA has been criticized for micromanaging its acquired development studios, forcing successful franchises into unsuitable formats, and fostering a “crunch culture” of excessive overtime that has contributed to a talent exodus.³

A former employee described Wilson’s internal communications as inauthentic and lacking empathy.³

These internal issues have been compounded by public missteps, such as layoffs, the cancellation of anticipated games, and Wilson’s personal opposition to a proposal for multi-family housing in his affluent town of Atherton.³

The strategic choices that have driven shareholder value are the very same ones that have alienated players and creative talent.

The focus on a few key live service franchises, while profitable, has led to a portfolio that many feel is less diverse and creatively daring.

The financial incentives embedded in Wilson’s compensation package directly reward the maximization of these controversial but profitable strategies, creating a feedback loop where financial success and reputational damage are inextricably linked.

VII. Concluding Analysis and Forward Outlook

The financial profile of Andrew Wilson is a case study in modern executive wealth creation within the technology sector.

His net worth, conservatively estimated to be well in excess of $150 million, is not the result of a single event but the product of a decade-long, systematic process.

This process is fueled by three interconnected factors: a corporate strategy laser-focused on digital live services; a compensation structure that lavishly incentivizes the financial success of that strategy; and the disciplined, regular conversion of the resulting equity awards into liquid wealth through pre-planned stock sales.

The analysis of his compensation reveals a structure expertly crafted to drive specific business outcomes.

The emphasis on metrics like non-GAAP operating income and net bookings has propelled EA’s transformation into a highly profitable digital services company.

However, this same structure has incentivized business practices—most notably aggressive in-game monetization—that have made Electronic Arts one of the most controversial companies in the entertainment industry.

Wilson’s legacy is therefore a complex duality: he is simultaneously the architect of immense shareholder value and the steward of a brand that has suffered significant reputational harm among its core customers.

His personal fortune stands as the ultimate symbol of this strategic choice to prioritize monetizable engagement above other stakeholder interests.

Looking forward, the sustainability of this model faces new challenges.

The interactive entertainment industry is on the cusp of another technological shift, with generative AI poised to radically alter development processes.¹⁵

Wilson himself has noted that AI could make EA’s development 30% more efficient and provide a multi-billion dollar growth opportunity.¹⁵

How EA navigates this transition—whether AI is used to foster greater creativity and player value or primarily as a tool for cost-cutting and more efficient monetization—will be a defining test of Wilson’s leadership.

The long-term health of Electronic Arts may depend on its ability to find a new equilibrium, one where the generation of shareholder value does not come at the expense of the trust and goodwill of the players and creators who form the foundation of its business.

The evolution of Andrew Wilson’s compensation and EA’s corporate strategy in this new era will determine his ultimate legacy as a titan of the gaming world.

Works cited

1. Andrew Wilson Net Worth (2025) – GuruFocus, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.gurufocus.com/insider/2110/andrew-wilson
2. Andrew Wilson Net Worth – Insider Trades and Bio as of Aug 7, 2025 – Benzinga, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/0001545193/andrew-wilson
3. EA CEO Andrew Wilson got a pay rise last year, while the company’s developers earned less on average : r/gaming – Reddit, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/1llxjip/ea_ceo_andrew_wilson_got_a_pay_rise_last_year/
4. Analyzing Evil: Andrew Wilson From Electronic Arts – YouTube, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7olb_wEVfg
5. Andrew Wilson Net Worth (2025) – Quiver Quantitative, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.quiverquant.com/insiders/1545193/Andrew-Wilson
6. Proxy Statement and Notice of Annual Meeting, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://s204.q4cdn.com/701424631/files/doc_financials/2025/ar/Electronic-Arts-2025-Proxy.pdf
7. ea-20240331 – SEC.gov, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/712515/000071251524000023/ea-20240331.htm
8. Andrew Wilson (businessman) – Wikipedia, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Wilson_(businessman)
9. Electronic Arts: Andrew Wilson – ScholarWorks@BGSU, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=mclp
10. Electronic Arts Executives – Official EA Site, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.ea.com/executives
11. Andrew Wilson Speaking Fee & Booking Agent Contact – Technology Speakers, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.technologyspeakers.com/speaker/andrew-wilson
12. Electronic Arts – Wikipedia, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Arts
13. Electronic Arts Annual Report 2024 Form 10-K (NASDAQ:EA) – StockLight, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://stocklight.com/stocks/us/nasdaq-ea/electronic-arts/annual-reports/nasdaq-ea-2024-10K-24973383.pdf
14. Electronic Arts | EA Stock Price, Company Overview & News – Forbes, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/companies/electronic-arts/
15. Andrew Wilson | VGC, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.videogameschronicle.com/people/andrew-wilson/