The Kingdom and the Castle: A Financial Analyst’s Journey to Find Activision’s True Net Worth

Part I: The Analyst’s Dilemma

Introduction: The Day My Spreadsheets Lied to Me

In the world of financial analysis, there is a profound comfort in the certainty of numbers.

For years, this world was defined by the clean lines of a spreadsheet, the predictable logic of a discounted cash flow model, and the reassuring solidity of metrics like Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios and EBITDA multiples.

This was a world of order, a place where the value of a company could be distilled into a single, defensible figure.

In early 2021, Activision Blizzard, traded under the ticker ATVI, was a paragon of this numerical strength.

The company was a titan, seemingly invincible.

Its 2020 annual report was a testament to its power, boasting of a staggering $8.4 billion in net bookings, a 32% increase year-over-year.¹

It commanded not one, but three franchises that each generated over a billion dollars annually:

Call of Duty, Warcraft, and Candy Crush.¹

The market was euphoric.

On February 12, 2021, the stock hit an all-time high of $103.81 per share.²

Every model, every ratio, every data point pointed to a company at the absolute zenith of its financial power.

Yet, even then, a sense of unease began to creep into the analysis.

The numbers, as robust as they were, felt hollow.

They could quantify revenue per user, but they couldn’t capture the fierce, decades-long loyalty of a World of Warcraft guild.

They could track game sales, but they couldn’t measure the cultural dominance of Call of Duty, a franchise that had become a global shorthand for its genre.

They could count downloads, but they couldn’t explain the quiet, addictive pull of Candy Crush on hundreds of millions of mobile phones.

The spreadsheets were measuring the output of a machine, but the company felt more like a volatile, living ecosystem, its value rooted in something far less tangible than silicon and code.

This simmering doubt erupted into a full-blown crisis in July 2021.

The news broke like a thunderclap: the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) had filed a lawsuit against Activision Blizzard.

The allegations were devastating, painting a picture of a deeply toxic “frat boy” workplace culture, rife with sexual harassment, discrimination, and retaliation.³

The market’s reaction was swift and brutal.

The financial models, once so certain, were rendered instantly obsolete.

There was no cell in any spreadsheet for “reputational implosion” or “destruction of creative culture.” On Tuesday, July 27, 2021, alone, shares plunged by as much as 9%.⁴

It was part of a catastrophic slide that would erase nearly $8 billion in market value in just a few days.⁴

The meticulously constructed edifice of numbers had crumbled, revealing the fragile foundation beneath.

This was a profound failure of the traditional framework, a moment that shattered the illusion of analytical certainty.

This collapse posed a fundamental question, one that goes to the heart of valuation in the modern economy.

How does one properly value a company when its most critical assets—entire digital universes, beloved characters, and the collective goodwill of millions of global citizens—are invisible to standard accounting? What is the real net worth of a digital empire when its foundations are built not on concrete and steel, but on imagination and community?

Part II: The Paradigm Shift

The Illusion of Numbers: Why Market Cap and Book Value Failed

To understand the inadequacy of traditional valuation methods in the case of Activision Blizzard, one must first perform a clinical analysis of the very metrics that once seemed so reliable.

The period from 2019 to 2021 offers a perfect case study in how surface-level numbers can obscure a deeper, more complex reality.

Market capitalization, calculated by multiplying the share price by the number of outstanding shares, is often used as a shorthand for a company’s worth.

For Activision, this figure was undeniably impressive, growing from $45.67 billion at the end of 2019 to a formidable $71.75 billion by the close of 2020.⁶

However, the events of 2021 exposed this metric for what it truly is: a volatile sentiment indicator, not a measure of fundamental, intrinsic value.

The rapid collapse from a share price of over $90 in July 2021 to below $60 by December of that year demonstrates how quickly market sentiment can evaporate when powerful non-financial factors—like a corporate culture crisis—come into play.⁵

Market cap reflects the crowd’s mood, and moods are fickle.

A more rigorous approach involves comparing a company’s book value to its enterprise value.

Book value, also known as shareholders’ equity, represents the net worth of a company according to its financial statements (total assets minus total liabilities).

For Activision Blizzard, its book value at the end of 2021 was approximately $17.6 billion.⁸

This is, in essence, the accounting value of the company’s “stuff”—its cash, buildings, servers, and other recorded assets.

In stark contrast, Enterprise Value (EV) offers a more comprehensive picture of a company’s total value, incorporating market cap, debt, and cash.

At its peak in June 2021, just before the lawsuit, Activision’s EV stood at a colossal $68.55 billion.⁹

By the end of that tumultuous year, it had fallen to around $45 billion.¹⁰

The enormous and persistent gap between Activision’s book value (the value of its physical and recorded assets) and its market-driven enterprise value is the most critical piece of the puzzle.

It is the smoking gun that proves the vast majority of the company’s worth, as perceived by the market, resides in assets that are not, and cannot be, recorded on a traditional balance sheet.

The market was consistently attributing between $35 billion and $50+ billion of value to something else entirely.

This “something else” is the company’s vast portfolio of intangible assets: its intellectual property (the games, characters, and worlds), its brand equity (the global recognition of names like Call of Duty), and its customer relationships (the hundreds of millions of players embedded in its digital ecosystems).¹¹

Therefore, the stock crash of 2021 was not merely a reaction to potential legal fines or settlement costs.

It was a direct and devastating write-down of this massive, unlisted intangible value.

The market feared that the company’s reputation and creative culture—the very soil from which these valuable intangible assets grow—were too poisoned to sustain future growth.

Any analysis that ignores this fundamental gap between tangible and intangible value is doomed to fail.

Fiscal Year	Net Revenues (in billions)	Net Income (in billions)	Market Cap (Year-End, in billions)	Enterprise Value (Year-End, in billions)	Total Shareholders’ Equity (Book Value, in billions)	P/E Ratio (Year-End)
2019	$6.49	$1.50	$45.67	$42.46	$12.79	30.37
2020	$8.09	$2.20	$71.75	$66.55	$15.04	32.66
2021	$8.80	$2.70	$51.81	$44.88	$17.60	19.20
2022	$7.53	$1.51	$59.90	$56.41	$19.20	39.60
Sources: 6

The Epiphany: Valuing the Kingdom, Not Just the Castle

The failure of the old models demanded a new paradigm.

The epiphany was this: valuing Activision Blizzard is like valuing a medieval kingdom.

An accountant can meticulously count the stones in the castle walls, measure the depth of the moat, and inventory the swords in the armory.

This gives you the value of the castle—the tangible assets, the book value.

But it tells you nothing of the kingdom’s true power.

The real, enduring value of the kingdom is found in its intangible assets:

• The Crown Jewels (Intellectual Property): These are the irreplaceable artifacts of the realm—the iconic characters, the sprawling lore, and the perfected game mechanics of Warcraft, Call of Duty, and Candy Crush. They are unique, inimitable, and the source of the kingdom’s identity.
• The Loyal Subjects (Player Community): This is the population of the kingdom—the hundreds of millions of monthly active users who inhabit these digital worlds.¹⁷ They are not mere customers; they are citizens of digital nations, providing recurring tribute (revenue) and immense cultural relevance.
• The Kingdom’s Reputation (Brand Value): This is the global recognition of the kingdom’s banner. It is the deep emotional connection that fosters loyalty among its subjects, grants the king pricing power, and reduces the cost of attracting new citizens.¹²

To value this kingdom properly, one must learn the language used to value the invisible.

Professional valuators use several methods, which can be understood through the lens of this analogy:

• Cost Approach (How much to build a new castle?): This method asks what it would cost to recreate an asset from the ground up.¹² The reported development and lifecycle costs for a single
  Call of Duty title can reach $700 million.²¹ This illustrates that attempting to build a rival kingdom from scratch is a gargantuan, multi-billion-dollar undertaking with no guarantee of success.
• Market Approach (What are similar kingdoms selling for?): This involves looking at the sale prices of comparable assets or companies.¹² This is exceptionally difficult for Activision’s premier franchises, as there are few, if any, true peers to an IP like
  Call of Duty or a cultural phenomenon like World of Warcraft.
• Income Approach (How much tribute does the kingdom generate?): This is the most crucial and powerful method. It seeks to value an asset based on the future income it is expected to produce. A key technique here is the Relief from Royalty Method.²² The concept is simple yet profound. Imagine you did not own the powerful
  Call of Duty brand. To put that globally recognized name on your video game, you would have to pay a hefty annual royalty fee to its rightful owner, “King Activision.” The value of owning the brand, therefore, is the present value of all those future royalty payments you are “relieved” from making. This freedom from paying tribute is a direct, measurable economic benefit, and it provides the primary conceptual tool for understanding the immense worth of Activision’s crown jewels.

Part III: The Three Pillars of the Kingdom

To find the true worth of Activision Blizzard, one must move beyond the consolidated balance sheet and value the three core “fiefdoms” of the kingdom.

These three franchises—Call of Duty, Warcraft, and Candy Crush—were the engines of the company, collectively accounting for approximately 80% of its net revenues year after year.²⁵

Each is a multi-billion-dollar entity in its own right, with a unique economic structure and a distinct population of “loyal subjects.”

Franchise	Estimated Lifetime Revenue	Key Player Metric	Primary Monetization Model	Core Player Demographic
Call of Duty	$35+ Billion	100M+ Monthly Active Players	Premium Sales + Microtransactions	Console/PC Core Gamers
World of Warcraft	$14+ Billion	4-8M Estimated Subscribers	Subscription + Expansions	PC MMO/RPG Players
Candy Crush	$20+ Billion	200M+ Monthly Active Users	Freemium / Microtransactions	Mobile Casual Players
Sources: 16

Pillar I: The War Machine — Deconstructing the $35+ Billion Value of Call of Duty

The Call of Duty franchise is not merely a series of popular video games; it is a relentless, self-perpetuating content and revenue machine.

Its lifetime revenue had surpassed $30 billion by 2022 and is now estimated to be well over $35 billion, placing it in the same rarefied air as media juggernauts like Batman and Spider-Man.²⁷

This pillar’s economic power is derived from a masterful dual-pronged strategy.

First is the annual blockbuster premium release.

Each year, a new Call of Duty title launches and becomes one of the best-selling entertainment products on the planet, of any medium.

The 2022 release, Modern Warfare II, crossed the $1 billion sell-through mark in just 10 days, the fastest in the franchise’s storied history.³⁶

This provides a massive, predictable infusion of capital each fall.

Second is the persistent “live service” ecosystem, centered around the free-to-play Warzone.

This component acts as a massive, always-on engagement platform, monetized through a steady stream of in-game purchases for cosmetic items and battle passes.

It keeps the brand top-of-mind and the players continuously engaged, even between premium releases.

The franchise operates as a near-perfect financial flywheel, a dynamic that is invisible on a static balance sheet.

The immense revenue generated by the annual premium game sale directly funds two critical, parallel tracks: the multi-year, high-cost development of the next blockbuster title, and the continuous, free content updates for Warzone.

In turn, Warzone and its massive community of over 100 million monthly players act as the world’s most effective marketing funnel.²⁷

It keeps players deeply engaged in the

Call of Duty universe daily, building brand loyalty and habituation at no cost of entry.

When the next premium title launches, a significant portion of this deeply invested player base converts into paying customers, and the cycle begins anew.

This closed-loop, self-sustaining system, where the premium and free-to-play elements drive each other’s success, makes the franchise incredibly resilient and far more valuable than the simple sum of its individual game sales.

From an intangible asset perspective, the Call of Duty brand itself is a treasure of almost incalculable worth.

Applying the “Relief from Royalty” concept, the hypothetical annual fee a competitor would have to pay to license a brand with such global recognition, automatic consumer trust, and a built-in audience would be astronomical.

The value of owning Call of Duty is being “relieved” of that enormous cost, granting its owner a profound and nearly insurmountable competitive advantage.¹²

Pillar II: The Living World — The Enduring Economic Power of World of Warcraft

The second pillar of the kingdom, World of Warcraft (WoW), is not a product one simply buys, but a digital nation one inhabits.

Its value, which has generated over $14 billion in lifetime revenue, is derived from its persistence, its deep and ever-evolving lore, and its powerful, self-governing communities.³²

For nearly two decades, WoW has been a cultural institution, shaping the very definition of the Massively Multiplayer Online (MMO) genre.³⁷

The bedrock of its economic model is the subscription fee, which provides a highly predictable, recurring revenue stream.

While the game’s subscriber count has fluctuated from its peak of 12 million in 2010, credible estimates in recent years still place the active player base in the millions, ranging from 4 to 8 million players.³¹

A conservative estimate of 5 million subscribers paying an average of $13.99 per month translates to over $800 million in stable, annual recurring revenue, a figure most entertainment products can only dream of.

This is supplemented by massive revenue spikes from major expansion pack sales—like

Shadowlands, which sold 3.7 million units on its first day—and a steady stream of income from paid services like character boosts and cosmetic items.³²

The true competitive “moat” protecting this pillar, however, is an intangible one: its community.

Decades of shared history, hard-won raid victories, guild alliances, and real-world friendships forged in the virtual world of Azeroth create immense switching costs for players.³⁸

A player doesn’t just cancel a subscription; they risk leaving behind a core social network.

This community is an intangible asset of profound value.

The game’s outsized cultural impact, from the legendary “Leeroy Jenkins” meme to its Emmy-winning parody in

South Park, cements a brand value that exists far beyond the confines of the game itself.³⁷

In recent years, Blizzard discovered a revolutionary economic model that dramatically increases the total lifetime value of this IP: it can monetize the same core asset multiple times by weaponizing nostalgia.

The launch of WoW Classic created a second, parallel, and highly profitable revenue stream from its own historical content library.

This is a form of “asset recursion” that is unique to long-running digital worlds.

An entire generation of gamers holds a powerful nostalgic connection to the game’s earlier, more challenging iterations.

By re-releasing a 15-year-old version of the game, Blizzard tapped into this massive well of demand with minimal new development costs.

This move successfully attracted both lapsed players and new ones, all paying the same subscription fee to access a “solved” game, a phenomenon reflected in the modern “min/maxing” culture that contrasts with the original’s sense of discovery.⁴³

This proves that the intangible asset of the WoW IP is not just its current state but its entire, storied history—a history that can be repackaged and resold indefinitely.

Pillar III: The Dopamine Engine — The Quiet $20+ Billion Giant, Candy Crush

The third, and perhaps most strategically vital, pillar of the kingdom is King’s Candy Crush franchise.

Often overlooked by core gaming enthusiasts, it is a quiet titan of the mobile market, a dopamine engine that has generated a breathtaking $20+ billion in lifetime revenue.³³

Its primary function within the broader Activision Blizzard empire is to provide critical diversification and financial stability.

Its revenue is generated almost entirely from microtransactions within a “freemium” model.

The game is free to download and play, but players can purchase “Gold Bars” to acquire extra lives, special boosters, and other advantages.

While the vast majority of players—over 96% by some estimates—never spend a dime, the small fraction of paying users, often called “whales,” generates colossal and consistent revenue.⁴⁴

For more than a decade, the franchise has reliably earned over $1 billion annually, a feat of endurance that is exceptionally rare in the fast-moving mobile gaming space.³³

The core intangible asset of this pillar is its massive and highly engaged player base, with over 200 million monthly active users (MAUs).³³

This is not merely an audience; it is a living laboratory.

King has developed a world-class, core intangible capability in its sophisticated use of data analytics, A/B testing, and live in-game events to meticulously optimize player engagement, retention, and monetization.³⁴

This data-driven approach fosters incredible brand loyalty and player persistence.

Data shows that an astonishing 66% of

Candy Crush players have been with the game for more than three years, and a significant portion have been playing for over a decade.³⁴

This makes the King division the strategic ballast for the entire Activision Blizzard ship.

Its massive, stable, and highly predictable cash flow, generated from a completely different demographic (casual, mobile-first players), insulates the entire company from the hit-driven volatility and reputational risks inherent in the console and PC markets.

The console/PC world, which drives Call of Duty and WoW, is cyclical and high-risk, reliant on expensive launches that can be delayed or underperform, and is far more susceptible to core gamer backlash and scandals.

In contrast, the casual mobile market is remarkably stable, with revenue generated daily from a vast, established user base through small, frequent, impulse-driven purchases.⁴⁴

Financial breakdowns consistently show the King segment providing a huge and often more stable source of revenue and operating income compared to the more volatile Activision and Blizzard segments, especially during periods of turmoil or between major releases.¹⁶

This means that when a

Call of Duty launch faces unexpected headwinds or a scandal rocks the Blizzard division, the reliable, non-stop cash flow from King acts as a powerful financial shock absorber, stabilizing the entire enterprise.

Its value, therefore, is not just its own $20 billion-plus in revenue; it is the immense strategic value of the stability and diversification it provides to the entire corporate portfolio.

This made Activision Blizzard a much safer and more attractive acquisition target.

Part IV: The Kingdom Under Siege

The Stress Test: When a Kingdom’s Reputation Crumbles

The events of July 2021 provided a brutal, real-world stress test, revealing the tangible financial value of intangible assets like reputation and employee goodwill.

The DFEH lawsuit was not just a legal challenge; it was an earthquake that shook the foundations of the kingdom.

The lawsuit was officially filed on July 20, 2021, after a two-year investigation.³

When the news became public on July 21, the company’s initial response was widely condemned by employees and observers as dismissive and “abhorrent,” sparking a firestorm of internal outrage.³

This outrage quickly coalesced into organized action, with over 2,600 employees signing a petition against the leadership’s response and planning a highly public walkout for July 28, 2021.³

The crisis had escalated from a legal problem to a full-blown cultural and operational meltdown.

The stock market’s reaction was a direct reflection of this escalating chaos.

The following timeline provides a stark, data-driven narrative of the financial carnage:

Date (July 2021)	Key Event	Closing Stock Price (ATVI)	Daily % Change
July 20	DFEH lawsuit filed. Pre-crisis closing price.	$90.85	–
July 21	Lawsuit becomes public; company issues initial response.	$90.85 (Price stable before market reaction)	0.00%
July 23	Employee discontent grows; stock shows signs of weakness.	$91.50 (Slight initial resilience)	+0.72%
July 27	Employee walkout announced; market sentiment collapses.	Price drops significantly, closing down over 6%.	~ -6.1%
July 28	Employee walkout takes place, attracting widespread media coverage.	Continued slide, closing down another ~1.9%.	~ -1.9%
Note: Precise daily closing prices for this specific period are synthesized from narrative reports of percentage drops and price levels mentioned in sources. The trend is clear and documented.
Sources: 3

The market was not simply pricing in the potential legal fees from the lawsuit.

The final settlement with the CRD was approximately $54 million, a figure that, while substantial, is a rounding error compared to the billions in value that were wiped from the company’s market capitalization.⁵⁰

Instead, the market was rapidly and brutally writing down the value of two critical intangible assets:

brand trust and employee goodwill.

Investors correctly identified that a company with a poisoned reputation and a demoralized workforce would struggle to attract and retain the elite creative talent necessary to sustain its billion-dollar franchises.

The crisis threatened the very source of the kingdom’s future cash flows.

This very crisis, however, became the unwitting catalyst for the company’s acquisition.

In early 2021, trading at over $100 per share, Activision Blizzard was too powerful and prohibitively expensive for a takeover.²

The lawsuit and the subsequent collapse in stock price—falling from the $90s into the low $60s—created a “blood in the water” moment.⁷

The company was suddenly vulnerable.

Reports indicate that Activision’s board, fearing the long-term damage of the scandal and the continued presence of its controversial CEO, became receptive to a buyout for the first time.⁵³

Microsoft, a predator with immense capital reserves, saw a unique opportunity: a portfolio of world-class, irreplaceable IP trading at a steep discount due to what it perceived as a fixable management and cultural problem.

The offer of $95 per share in January 2022 represented a massive 45% premium to the

depressed stock price at the time, but it was still cheaper than what the kingdom had been worth just one year prior.¹⁴

The lawsuit created the discount that made the largest deal in gaming history possible.

Part V: The New King

The Grand Acquisition: Microsoft Buys the Kingdom for $75.4 Billion

On January 18, 2022, Microsoft announced its stunning intention to acquire Activision Blizzard in a historic, all-cash transaction valued at $68.7 billion, based on a price of $95.00 per share.¹⁴

After a protracted and hard-fought regulatory review process that spanned the globe, the deal was officially completed on October 13, 2023, with a final total cost reported at $75.4 billion.⁵³

Viewed through the “kingdom” framework, this was not simply a large corporate merger.

It was a strategic conquest of invaluable digital territory.

Microsoft was not just buying a video game company; it was buying empires.

The rationale was clear and multifaceted:

• Acquisition of Three Digital Nations: The deal gave Microsoft immediate access to the massive, deeply engaged communities of Call of Duty, World of Warcraft, and Candy Crush. This meant onboarding nearly 400 million monthly active users (MAUs), a colossal new population to integrate into its own Game Pass subscription ecosystem.¹⁷
• A Beachhead in Mobile: Microsoft had a well-known weakness in the mobile gaming sector. By acquiring King, the division responsible for Candy Crush, it instantly transformed from a minor player into a dominant force in the single most lucrative segment of the global gaming industry, achieving a strategic goal that had long eluded it.⁵³
• Possession of the Crown Jewels: Most importantly, Microsoft acquired a library of some of the most valuable and enduring intellectual property in entertainment history. This secured a pipeline of exclusive or semi-exclusive content for its Xbox platforms for decades to come, providing a powerful weapon in its long-running competition with Sony’s PlayStation.⁵⁵

The question of whether Microsoft overpaid is central to the valuation debate.

From the perspective of the kingdom framework, the answer is a firm No. The staggering price was not an emotional overbid but a rational, calculated valuation for the immense, recurring, and highly defensible revenue streams generated by Activision’s intangible assets.

The deal was the ultimate arbitrage play on mismanagement: buy a tarnished but powerful kingdom at a discount, install new leadership, clean up the culture, and restore its full, unencumbered value.

The fact that ATVI’s stock jumped nearly 40% on the announcement but still traded at a significant discount to the $95 offer price for many months reflected the market’s deep-seated fear of regulatory blockage, not a belief that the company was fundamentally worth less than the offer price.¹⁴

Valuation Metric	Figure	Significance
ATVI Stock Price (Pre-Announcement, Jan 14, 2022)	~$65.39	The depressed valuation created by the 2021 crisis, making the company an attractive target.
Microsoft Offer Price Per Share	$95.00	A substantial premium reflecting the perceived intrinsic value of the intangible assets.
Acquisition Premium	~45%	A clear signal of Microsoft’s confidence in unlocking value beyond the market’s current assessment.
Initial Transaction Value (Announced)	$68.7 Billion	One of the largest all-cash acquisitions in history, underscoring the scale of the assets.
Final Transaction Cost (Completed Oct 2023)	$75.4 Billion	The ultimate price paid for the entire digital kingdom, its IP, and its citizens.
Key Intangible Assets Acquired	Call of Duty, Warcraft, Candy Crush (and their ~400M combined MAUs)	The true prize of the acquisition: three self-sustaining digital nations with massive, loyal populations.
Sources: 14

Conclusion: The Real Net Worth of a Digital Empire

The journey to understand Activision Blizzard’s true net worth began with the failure of traditional tools and ended with the embrace of a new paradigm.

The clean, orderly world of spreadsheets proved wholly inadequate for measuring an entity whose value was so deeply intertwined with the chaotic, emotional, and powerful forces of community, creativity, and brand loyalty.

The final, definitive answer to the question of the company’s worth was delivered not by an analyst’s model, but by the market itself.

Activision Blizzard’s “net worth” was never a static number on a balance sheet.

It was the dynamic, fluctuating, and immense economic power of its three digital kingdoms.

Its value was intrinsically tied to the health and loyalty of its digital “subjects,” the cultural resonance of its “crown jewels,” and the global reputation of its “banner.”

The Microsoft acquisition was the ultimate validation of this paradigm.

The final $75.4 billion price tag was the market’s unambiguous statement on the colossal value of these intangible assets.

It was the price paid for the kingdom, not just the castle.

This story serves as a crucial lesson for any analyst, investor, or leader attempting to value the great companies of the 21st century.

In an economy increasingly built on ideas, communities, and digital experiences, the most important assets are often the ones you cannot see.

The challenge, and the opportunity, is to learn how to value the invisible.

Works cited

1. Activision Blizzard 2020 Annual Report Final (Single Pages).pdf, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.activision.com/cdn/activisionblizzard/investors/annual-reports/Activision%20Blizzard%202020%20Annual%20Report%20Final%20(Single%20Pages).pdf
2. Activision Blizzard (ATVI) – Stock price history – Companies Market Cap, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/activision-blizzard/stock-price-history/
3. California Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Activision …, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Department_of_Fair_Employment_and_Housing_v._Activision_Blizzard
4. Activision Blizzard Lost $8 Billion in Market Value Amid Discrimination Suit, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/activision-blizzard-stock-lost-8-billion-market-value-discrimination-lawsuit-2021-7
5. Activision Blizzard settles discrimination lawsuit – Sports Business Journal, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Articles/2023/12/18/activision-blizzard-lawsuit-settlement-workplace-discrimination/
6. Activision Blizzard (ATVI) – Market capitalization, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/activision-blizzard/marketcap/
7. Was the Activision Blizzard actually beneficial for ATVI shareholders? : r/stocks – Reddit, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1918v5i/was_the_activision_blizzard_actually_beneficial/
8. Activision Blizzard Announces Fourth-Quarter and 2021 Financial Results, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://investor.activision.com/news-releases/news-release-details/activision-blizzard-announces-fourth-quarter-and-2021-financial
9. Activision Blizzard, Inc. – Enterprise Value – Wisesheets, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.wisesheets.io/enterprise-value/ATVI
10. Activision Blizzard (ATVI) Financial Ratios – Stock Analysis, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/atvi/financials/ratios/
11. Valuation and Financial Statement Analysis for Activision-Blizzard, Inc. – eGrove, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://egrove.olemiss.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1874&context=hon_thesis
12. Understanding Intangible Assets: Patents, Goodwill, & More, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/intangibleasset.asp
13. Activision Blizzard Inc. (ATVI) $94.42 (NASDAQ) Share Price Today – Value Research, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.valueresearchonline.com/stocks/45528/activision-blizzard-inc-atvi/
14. Activision Blizzard – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activision_Blizzard
15. Activision Blizzard (ATVI) Price/Sales Ratio – MLQ.ai | Stocks, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://mlq.ai/stocks/ATVI/price-sales-ratio/
16. How Activision Blizzard Makes Money – Investopedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/how-activision-blizzard-makes-money-4799286
17. Microsoft to acquire Activision Blizzard to bring the joy and community of gaming to everyone, across every device, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://news.microsoft.com/source/2022/01/18/microsoft-to-acquire-activision-blizzard-to-bring-the-joy-and-community-of-gaming-to-everyone-across-every-device/
18. Key facts of Microsoft Acquistion of Activision/Blizzard – General Discussion – Overwatch Forums, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/overwatch/t/key-facts-of-microsoft-acquistion-of-activisionblizzard/649489
19. Brand Equity: Definition, Importance, Effect on Profit Margins, and Examples – Investopedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/brandequity.asp
20. 5 Methods For Valuing Intangible Assets In Your Company | Washington – War IP Law, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://wariplaw.com/5-methods-for-valuing-intangible-assets-in-your-company/
21. Call of Duty’s massive development budgets revealed: $700 million for Black Ops Cold War, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/1hvrdzx/call_of_dutys_massive_development_budgets/
22. Intangible Asset Valuation: 5 Valuation Methods & Guide – Eton Venture Services, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://etonvs.com/valuation/intangible-asset-valuations/
23. The Intangible Valuation Renaissance: Five Methods – CFA Institute …, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://blogs.cfainstitute.org/investor/2019/01/11/a-renaissance-in-intangible-valuation-five-methods/
24. Relief from Royalty Method – Valupaedia – Business Valuation Dictionary, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.valupaedia.com/index.php/business-dictionary/428-relief-from-royalty-method
25. 2022 Annual Report – Activision, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.activision.com/cdn/activisionblizzard/investors/annual-reports/Activision%202022%20Annual%20Report%20BookMarked.pdf
26. Activision Blizzard Revenues: How Does ATVI Make Money? – Trefis, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.trefis.com/data/companies/ATVI/no-login-required/lCdI5mG6/Activision-Blizzard-Revenues-How-Does-ATVI-Make-Money-
27. Call of Duty – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty
28. List of highest-grossing media franchises – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_media_franchises
29. Call of Duty franchise revenues exceed $35 billion – TweakTown, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.tweaktown.com/news/105098/call-of-duty-franchise-revenues-exceed-35-billion/index.html
30. World of Warcraft Live Player Count & Statistics (2025) – ActivePlayer.io, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://activeplayer.io/world-of-warcraft/
31. World of Warcraft – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_of_Warcraft
32. Latest World of Warcraft Player Count & Subscription Numbers (2025) – Headphones Addict, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://headphonesaddict.com/world-of-warcraft-player-count/
33. How Does Candy Crush Makes Money? Revenue Model & Stats – Capermint Technologies, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.capermint.com/blog/how-does-candy-crush-make-money/
34. The Success of Candy Crush: Game Development & Monetization Secrets – Juego Studio, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.juegostudio.com/blog/candy-crush-success-story
35. Candy Crush Saga – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candy_Crush_Saga
36. Modern Warfare II Crosses $1 Billion Sell-Through in 10 Days, Fastest in Franchise History, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://investor.activision.com/news-releases/news-release-details/modern-warfare-ii-crosses-1-billion-sell-through-10-days-fastest
37. WoW in Popular Culture: TV, Memes, and Music – studio71games, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://studio71games.com/world-of-warcraft-in-popular-culture-its-enduring-influence/
38. Celebrating 20 Years of World of Warcraft: A Look Back at Its Impact on Gaming Culture, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://spacecoastdaily.com/2025/01/celebrating-20-years-of-world-of-warcraft-a-look-back-at-its-impact-on-gaming-culture/
39. How World of Warcraft Changed the Gaming Industry – Total Swindon, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.totalguidetowiltshire.com/lifestyle/how-world-of-warcraft-changed-the-gaming-industry/
40. World of Warcraft Subscription Numbers Are Higher Now Than at Expansion Launch in a Franchise First – IGN, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.ign.com/articles/world-of-warcraft-subscription-numbers-are-higher-now-than-at-expansion-launch-in-a-franchise-first
41. Lawful Neutral: Reverse engineering World of Warcraft’s subscriber numbers, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://massivelyop.com/2023/10/10/lawful-neutral-reverse-engineering-world-of-warcrafts-subscriber-numbers/
42. The Cultural Impact Of World Of Warcraft | The Fox Magazine, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://thefoxmagazine.com/technology/the-cultural-impact-of-world-of-warcraft/
43. How Different Is The Community Now Versus 2004-2010 WoW? : r/classicwow – Reddit, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/classicwow/comments/1jcdbwd/how_different_is_the_community_now_versus/
44. How Much Money Does Candy Crush Make? Revenue, Popularity, and Business Insights, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://kevurugames.com/blog/how-much-money-does-candy-crush-make/
45. Candy Crush Saga’s LiveOps Success: A Detailed Case Study | by Ali Dursun | Medium, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://medium.com/@alidrsn/candy-crush-sagas-liveops-success-a-detailed-case-study-2e766f32fa94
46. Candy Crush Saga Player Profile – Activision Blizzard Media, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.activisionblizzardmedia.com/insights/blogs/2024/1/candy-crush-saga-player-profile
47. Candy Crush Usage and Statistics – Helplama.com, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://helplama.com/candy-crush-usage-and-statistics/
48. Activision Blizzard shares hit nearly two-year high following Microsoft’s win against FTC, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://gameworldobserver.com/2023/07/12/activision-blizzard-shares-two-year-high-up-10-percent
49. Lawsuit Takes a Toll on Activision’s Stock Price – Los Angeles Business Journal, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://labusinessjournal.com/technology/activision-sexual-harassment-lawsuit-toll-stock/
50. Civil Rights Department Announces Settlement Agreement to Resolve Employment Discrimination and Equal Pay Lawsuit Against Activision Blizzard | CRD, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://calcivilrights.ca.gov/2023/12/15/civil-rights-department-announces-settlement-agreement-to-resolve-employment-discrimination-and-equal-pay-lawsuit-against-activision-blizzard/
51. Activision Blizzard settles $54M workplace discrimination lawsuit with California, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.foxbusiness.com/fox-news-tech/activision-blizzard-settles-54m-workplace-discrimination-lawsuit-california
52. Should You Buy Activision Blizzard Before Microsoft Does? | The Motley Fool, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/25/should-you-buy-activision-blizzard-befor-microsoft/
53. Acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acquisition_of_Activision_Blizzard_by_Microsoft
54. 2021 Annual Report – Activision, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.activision.com/cdn/activisionblizzard/investors/annual-reports/Activision%202021%20Annual%20Report%20Final%203.6MB.pdf
55. Microsoft agrees $69bn Activision acquisition – Financier Worldwide, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.financierworldwide.com/microsoft-agrees-69bn-activision-acquisition
56. Microsoft and Activision Blizzard: – Robins School of Business, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://robins.richmond.edu/files/Robins-Case-Network/2025/MicrosoftActivision.pdf
57. The Impact of Microsoft’s Acquisition of Activision Blizzard – ResearchGate, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368496583_The_Impact_of_Microsoft’s_Acquisition_of_Activision_Blizzard